Application of Global Burden of Animal Diseases methods at country level: experiences of the Ethiopia case study.

IF 1.9 4区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
W T Jemberu, G Chaters, W Asfaw, G B Asteraye, K Amenu, B Huntington, T J D Knight-Jones, J Rushton
{"title":"Application of Global Burden of Animal Diseases methods at country level: experiences of the Ethiopia case study.","authors":"W T Jemberu, G Chaters, W Asfaw, G B Asteraye, K Amenu, B Huntington, T J D Knight-Jones, J Rushton","doi":"10.20506/rst.43.3524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Animals play a central role in human livelihoods and welfare. Animal diseases have a great impact on the benefits humans derive from animals and can also pose a risk to human health. Better control of animal diseases generates wider societal benefits, including reducing the climate and ecological impacts of livestock and improving animal welfare. To better understand the scale of investment justified for the control and prevention of animal disease, the wide-ranging impacts of disease on animal production and health must be measured. The Global Burden of Animal Diseases (GBADs) programme is quantifying animal disease burden from the local to global levels. The GBADs programme includes country case studies for national- and local-level analysis. Ethiopia is the first case study country in which GBADs methods have been applied. GBADs'Ethiopia case study consists of three activity areas: i) stakeholder engagement; ii) livestock disease burden estimation, including data collection, analytics, evidence generation and communication; and iii) capacity building in animal health economics. At the start of the case study, various stakeholder communication platforms were used to familiarise stakeholders with GBADs and engage their support in various ways, including data access, and, through this engagement, to ensure the programme tools and outputs were relevant and useful to their needs. Existing data were retrieved from multiple sources and used to estimate disease burden. This process involved multiple steps, including estimation of biomass and economic value, the Animal Health Loss Envelope (farm-level disease burden), wider economic impacts and attribution of the disease burden to different levels of causes. This was carried out for major livestock species (cattle, sheep, goats and poultry) in Ethiopia. Capacity building on animal health economics was carried out for GBADs end users to increase competence in utilising animal health economic evidence, including GBADs outputs. This article documents experiences of the implementation of these activities in the GBADs Ethiopia case study.</p>","PeriodicalId":49596,"journal":{"name":"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.43.3524","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Animals play a central role in human livelihoods and welfare. Animal diseases have a great impact on the benefits humans derive from animals and can also pose a risk to human health. Better control of animal diseases generates wider societal benefits, including reducing the climate and ecological impacts of livestock and improving animal welfare. To better understand the scale of investment justified for the control and prevention of animal disease, the wide-ranging impacts of disease on animal production and health must be measured. The Global Burden of Animal Diseases (GBADs) programme is quantifying animal disease burden from the local to global levels. The GBADs programme includes country case studies for national- and local-level analysis. Ethiopia is the first case study country in which GBADs methods have been applied. GBADs'Ethiopia case study consists of three activity areas: i) stakeholder engagement; ii) livestock disease burden estimation, including data collection, analytics, evidence generation and communication; and iii) capacity building in animal health economics. At the start of the case study, various stakeholder communication platforms were used to familiarise stakeholders with GBADs and engage their support in various ways, including data access, and, through this engagement, to ensure the programme tools and outputs were relevant and useful to their needs. Existing data were retrieved from multiple sources and used to estimate disease burden. This process involved multiple steps, including estimation of biomass and economic value, the Animal Health Loss Envelope (farm-level disease burden), wider economic impacts and attribution of the disease burden to different levels of causes. This was carried out for major livestock species (cattle, sheep, goats and poultry) in Ethiopia. Capacity building on animal health economics was carried out for GBADs end users to increase competence in utilising animal health economic evidence, including GBADs outputs. This article documents experiences of the implementation of these activities in the GBADs Ethiopia case study.

在国家层面应用全球动物疾病负担方法:埃塞俄比亚案例研究的经验。
动物在人类的生计和福利中发挥着核心作用。动物疾病会严重影响人类从动物身上获得的利益,也会对人类健康构成威胁。更好地控制动物疾病可产生更广泛的社会效益,包括减少牲畜对气候和生态的影响以及改善动物福利。为了更好地了解控制和预防动物疾病的投资规模,必须衡量疾病对动物生产和健康的广泛影响。全球动物疾病负担(GBADs)计划正在从地方到全球层面量化动物疾病负担。GBADs 计划包括国家案例研究,用于国家和地方层面的分析。埃塞俄比亚是第一个采用 GBADs 方法进行案例研究的国家。GBADs 埃塞俄比亚案例研究包括三个活动领域:i) 利益相关者参与;ii) 牲畜疾病负担估算,包括数据收集、分析、证据生成和交流;iii) 动物健康经济学能力建设。在案例研究开始时,利用各种利益相关者交流平台让利益相关者熟悉全球生物多样性与农业发展项目,并以各种方式争取他们的支持,包括数据访问,通过这种参与,确保计划工具和产出与他们的需求相关且有用。从多个来源检索现有数据,并用于估算疾病负担。这一过程涉及多个步骤,包括估算生物量和经济价值、动物健康损失包络(农场一级的疾病负担)、更广泛的经济影响以及将疾病负担归因于不同程度的原因。这项工作针对埃塞俄比亚的主要牲畜物种(牛、绵羊、山羊和家禽)开展。为 GBADs 的最终用户开展了动物健康经济学方面的能力建设,以提高利用动物健康经济学证据(包括 GBADs 的产出)的能力。本文记录了在埃塞俄比亚 GBADs 案例研究中开展这些活动的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scientific and Technical Review is a periodical publication containing scientific information that is updated constantly. The Review plays a significant role in fulfilling some of the priority functions of the OIE. This peer-reviewed journal contains in-depth studies devoted to current scientific and technical developments in animal health and veterinary public health worldwide, food safety and animal welfare. The Review benefits from the advice of an Advisory Editorial Board and a Scientific and Technical Committee composed of top scientists from across the globe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信