Barriers in providing quality end-of-life care as perceived by nurses working in critical care units: an integrative review.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Yousef Saleh Rubbai, Mei Chan Chong, Li Yoong Tang, Khatijah Lim Abdullah, Walid Theib Mohammad, Samira Mohajer, Mohammad Namazinia
{"title":"Barriers in providing quality end-of-life care as perceived by nurses working in critical care units: an integrative review.","authors":"Yousef Saleh Rubbai, Mei Chan Chong, Li Yoong Tang, Khatijah Lim Abdullah, Walid Theib Mohammad, Samira Mohajer, Mohammad Namazinia","doi":"10.1186/s12904-024-01543-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite increasing interest in quality end-of-life care (EOLC), critically ill patients often receive suboptimal care. Critical care nurses play a crucial role in EOLC, but face numerous barriers that hinder their ability to provide compassionate and effective care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An integrative literature review was conducted to investigate barriers impacting the quality of end-of-life care. This review process involved searching database like MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, EBSCO, and ScienceDirect up to November 2023. Search strategies focused on keywords related to barriers in end-of-life care and critical care nurses from October 30th to November 10th, 2023. The inclusion criteria specified full-text English articles published between 2010 and 2023 that addressed barriers perceived by critical care nurses. This integrative review employs an integrated thematic analysis approach, which combines elements of deductive and inductive analysis, to explore the identified barriers, with coding and theme development overseen by the primary and secondary authors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 103 articles published, 11 articles were included in the review. There were eight cross-sectional descriptive studies and three qualitative studies, which demonstrated barriers affecting end-of-life care quality. Quality appraisal using the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool was completed by two authors confirmed the high credibility of the selected studies, indicating the presence of high-quality evidence across the reviewed articles. Thematic analysis led to the three main themes (1) barriers related to patients and their families, (2) barriers related to nurses and their demographic characteristics, and (3) barriers related to health care environment and institutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review highlights barriers influencing the quality of end of life care perceived by critical care nurses and the gaps that need attention to improve the quality of care provided for patients in their final stages and their fsmilies within the context of critical care. This review also notes the need for additional research to investigate the uncover patterns and insights that have not been fully explored in the existing literature to enhance understanding of these barriers. This can help to inform future research, care provision, and policy-making. Specifically, this review examines how these barriers interact, their cumulative impact on care quality, and potential strategies to overcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363454/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01543-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite increasing interest in quality end-of-life care (EOLC), critically ill patients often receive suboptimal care. Critical care nurses play a crucial role in EOLC, but face numerous barriers that hinder their ability to provide compassionate and effective care.

Methods: An integrative literature review was conducted to investigate barriers impacting the quality of end-of-life care. This review process involved searching database like MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, EBSCO, and ScienceDirect up to November 2023. Search strategies focused on keywords related to barriers in end-of-life care and critical care nurses from October 30th to November 10th, 2023. The inclusion criteria specified full-text English articles published between 2010 and 2023 that addressed barriers perceived by critical care nurses. This integrative review employs an integrated thematic analysis approach, which combines elements of deductive and inductive analysis, to explore the identified barriers, with coding and theme development overseen by the primary and secondary authors.

Results: Out of 103 articles published, 11 articles were included in the review. There were eight cross-sectional descriptive studies and three qualitative studies, which demonstrated barriers affecting end-of-life care quality. Quality appraisal using the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool was completed by two authors confirmed the high credibility of the selected studies, indicating the presence of high-quality evidence across the reviewed articles. Thematic analysis led to the three main themes (1) barriers related to patients and their families, (2) barriers related to nurses and their demographic characteristics, and (3) barriers related to health care environment and institutions.

Conclusion: This review highlights barriers influencing the quality of end of life care perceived by critical care nurses and the gaps that need attention to improve the quality of care provided for patients in their final stages and their fsmilies within the context of critical care. This review also notes the need for additional research to investigate the uncover patterns and insights that have not been fully explored in the existing literature to enhance understanding of these barriers. This can help to inform future research, care provision, and policy-making. Specifically, this review examines how these barriers interact, their cumulative impact on care quality, and potential strategies to overcome.

重症监护病房护士认为在提供优质临终关怀服务方面存在的障碍:综合综述。
背景:尽管人们越来越关注高质量的临终关怀(EOLC),但危重病人往往得不到最佳的护理。重症监护护士在临终关怀中发挥着至关重要的作用,但却面临着许多障碍,这些障碍阻碍了她们提供富有同情心和有效护理的能力:方法:为调查影响临终关怀质量的障碍,我们进行了综合文献综述。综述过程包括检索 MEDLINE、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、CINAHL、EBSCO 和 ScienceDirect 等数据库,检索时间截至 2023 年 11 月。搜索策略主要集中在与临终关怀和重症监护护士障碍相关的关键词上,搜索时间从 10 月 30 日至 2023 年 11 月 10 日。纳入标准为 2010 年至 2023 年间发表的涉及危重症护理护士感知障碍的全文英文文章。本综合综述采用了综合主题分析方法,结合了演绎和归纳分析的元素,以探讨所发现的障碍,并由主要作者和次要作者监督编码和主题发展:在已发表的 103 篇文章中,有 11 篇文章被纳入综述。结果:在已发表的 103 篇文章中,有 11 篇文章被纳入综述,其中有 8 篇横断面描述性研究和 3 篇定性研究,这些研究都证明了影响临终关怀质量的障碍。两位作者使用 "混合方法评估工具"(Mixed Method Appraisal Tool)完成了质量评估,确认了所选研究的高度可信性,表明所综述文章中存在高质量的证据。专题分析得出了三大主题:(1)与患者及其家属有关的障碍;(2)与护士及其人口特征有关的障碍;以及(3)与医疗环境和机构有关的障碍:本综述强调了影响危重症护理护士感知的生命末期护理质量的障碍,以及需要关注的差距,以提高在危重症护理背景下为处于生命末期的患者及其家属提供的护理质量。本综述还指出,有必要开展更多的研究,调查现有文献中尚未充分探讨的揭示模式和见解,以加深对这些障碍的理解。这将有助于为未来的研究、护理提供和政策制定提供信息。具体而言,本综述探讨了这些障碍如何相互作用,它们对护理质量的累积影响,以及克服这些障碍的潜在策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信