Physiotherapy educators' perceptions of physiotherapists' competencies and continuing education in the practice of musculoskeletal physiotherapy direct access.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Roine Minna, Jäppinen Anna-Maija, Karvonen Eira, Munukka Matti, Vuoskoski Pirjo
{"title":"Physiotherapy educators' perceptions of physiotherapists' competencies and continuing education in the practice of musculoskeletal physiotherapy direct access.","authors":"Roine Minna, Jäppinen Anna-Maija, Karvonen Eira, Munukka Matti, Vuoskoski Pirjo","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2024.2394512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of direct access (DA) physiotherapy practice in Finland is the treatment of musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions by physiotherapists who have completed continuing DA education. It is difficult to pinpoint the competencies of DA physiotherapists as their roles and scope of practice varies.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The present study aimed to explore the competencies and education of DA physiotherapists through the perceptions of DA educators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected through individual semi-structured interviews of eleven Finnish physiotherapy educators who described their perceptions of DA physiotherapists' competencies and their continuing DA education. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim and then examined using a reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two main themes were formulated on the basis of the data, conveying the educators' perceptions. The first theme, Interaction as grounds for meaningful clinical reasoning, had two subthemes: Meaningful encounter and Rationally and safely locating the core of the client's problem. The second theme, Continuing professional development in an expert role, had four subthemes: Continuous learning, Self-reflection, Deep understanding and Taking responsibility for one's own expertise.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study revealed how DA educators perceive the competencies of DA physiotherapists. The findings highlight the perceived significance of the physiotherapists' interaction with the client as a ground for meaningful clinical reasoning, and their responsibility for their own continuing professional self-development.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2394512","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of direct access (DA) physiotherapy practice in Finland is the treatment of musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions by physiotherapists who have completed continuing DA education. It is difficult to pinpoint the competencies of DA physiotherapists as their roles and scope of practice varies.

Purpose: The present study aimed to explore the competencies and education of DA physiotherapists through the perceptions of DA educators.

Methods: Data were collected through individual semi-structured interviews of eleven Finnish physiotherapy educators who described their perceptions of DA physiotherapists' competencies and their continuing DA education. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim and then examined using a reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Two main themes were formulated on the basis of the data, conveying the educators' perceptions. The first theme, Interaction as grounds for meaningful clinical reasoning, had two subthemes: Meaningful encounter and Rationally and safely locating the core of the client's problem. The second theme, Continuing professional development in an expert role, had four subthemes: Continuous learning, Self-reflection, Deep understanding and Taking responsibility for one's own expertise.

Conclusion: The present study revealed how DA educators perceive the competencies of DA physiotherapists. The findings highlight the perceived significance of the physiotherapists' interaction with the client as a ground for meaningful clinical reasoning, and their responsibility for their own continuing professional self-development.

物理治疗教育者对物理治疗师在肌肉骨骼物理治疗直通车实践中的能力和继续教育的看法。
简介:在芬兰,直接获取(DA)物理治疗实践的目的是由完成DA继续教育的物理治疗师治疗肌肉骨骼(MSK)疾病。由于直达物理治疗师的角色和执业范围各不相同,因此很难确定他们的能力。目的:本研究旨在通过直达物理治疗师教育者的看法来探讨直达物理治疗师的能力和教育:方法:通过对 11 名芬兰物理治疗教育者进行个人半结构式访谈收集数据,这些教育者描述了他们对伤残人士物理治疗师的能力及其持续伤残人士教育的看法。访谈被逐字记录和转录,然后使用反思性主题分析法进行研究:结果:根据数据形成了两大主题,表达了教育者的看法。第一个主题 "互动是有意义的临床推理的基础 "有两个次主题:有意义的接触和合理安全地找到客户问题的核心。第二个主题 "专家角色的持续专业发展 "有四个次主题:结论:本研究揭示了伤残津贴教育者如何看待伤残津贴物理治疗师的能力。研究结果强调了物理治疗师与客户的互动作为有意义的临床推理的基础所具有的重要意义,以及他们对自己的持续专业自我发展所承担的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信