Clinician Experiences of and Responses to the Challenges of Working with Patients in the Australian Compensation Setting.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Alison Sim, Amy G McNeilage, Trudy Rebbeck, Claire E Ashton-James
{"title":"Clinician Experiences of and Responses to the Challenges of Working with Patients in the Australian Compensation Setting.","authors":"Alison Sim, Amy G McNeilage, Trudy Rebbeck, Claire E Ashton-James","doi":"10.1007/s10926-024-10232-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Previous research indicates that the compensation process is stressful for people with a compensable injury, contributing to poorer recovery. However, little is known about the challenges faced by clinicians who work in this setting. This study aims to qualitatively explore the experiences of clinicians delivering care to patients with compensable injuries in Australia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 experienced clinicians providing care to compensable patients in Australia. The interviews were transcribed, and data were analysed using reflective thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants described their work as challenging due to factors such as high patient distress, poor clinical outcomes, and high administrative load. However, they responded to these challenges in varying ways. While some reported feelings of vicarious injustice, emotional exhaustion, and self-doubt, others derived a sense of meaning, purpose, and mastery from these challenges. Clinician responses to the challenge of working with people with a compensation claim were associated with access to mentoring, continuous education and training, and a supportive workplace culture.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinicians reported both positive and negative responses to the challenges of working with people with a compensable injury. Coping strategies that were associated with more positive reactions included seeking further education, mentoring, peer support. Prioritising these support systems is important for clinician wellbeing and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-024-10232-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Previous research indicates that the compensation process is stressful for people with a compensable injury, contributing to poorer recovery. However, little is known about the challenges faced by clinicians who work in this setting. This study aims to qualitatively explore the experiences of clinicians delivering care to patients with compensable injuries in Australia.

Materials and methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 experienced clinicians providing care to compensable patients in Australia. The interviews were transcribed, and data were analysed using reflective thematic analysis.

Results: Participants described their work as challenging due to factors such as high patient distress, poor clinical outcomes, and high administrative load. However, they responded to these challenges in varying ways. While some reported feelings of vicarious injustice, emotional exhaustion, and self-doubt, others derived a sense of meaning, purpose, and mastery from these challenges. Clinician responses to the challenge of working with people with a compensation claim were associated with access to mentoring, continuous education and training, and a supportive workplace culture.

Conclusion: Clinicians reported both positive and negative responses to the challenges of working with people with a compensable injury. Coping strategies that were associated with more positive reactions included seeking further education, mentoring, peer support. Prioritising these support systems is important for clinician wellbeing and patient outcomes.

临床医生在澳大利亚赔偿环境中与患者共事的经历和应对挑战的方法。
目的:以往的研究表明,赔偿过程会给可赔偿伤害的患者带来压力,从而导致其恢复较差。然而,人们对在这种情况下工作的临床医生所面临的挑战知之甚少。本研究旨在定性探讨澳大利亚临床医生为可赔偿伤害患者提供护理的经验:对澳大利亚 26 名为可赔偿患者提供医疗服务的资深临床医生进行了半结构化访谈。对访谈内容进行了誊写,并采用反思性主题分析法对数据进行了分析:结果:由于病人痛苦大、临床效果差和行政负担重等因素,参与者认为他们的工作具有挑战性。然而,他们以不同的方式应对这些挑战。一些人报告说,他们感到了替代性不公正、情感疲惫和自我怀疑,而另一些人则从这些挑战中获得了意义感、目的感和主人翁感。临床医生应对与索赔者合作的挑战的方式与获得指导、持续教育和培训以及支持性的工作场所文化有关:结论:临床医生对与可获赔工伤人员共事时所面临的挑战既有积极的应对措施,也有消极的应对措施。与积极反应相关的应对策略包括寻求进修、指导和同伴支持。优先考虑这些支持系统对于临床医生的健康和患者的治疗效果非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on the rehabilitation, reintegration, and prevention of disability in workers. The journal offers investigations involving original data collection and research synthesis (i.e., scoping reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses). Papers derive from a broad array of fields including rehabilitation medicine, physical and occupational therapy, health psychology and psychiatry, orthopedics, oncology, occupational and insurance medicine, neurology, social work, ergonomics, biomedical engineering, health economics, rehabilitation engineering, business administration and management, and law.  A single interdisciplinary source for information on work disability rehabilitation, the Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation helps to advance the scientific understanding, management, and prevention of work disability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信