A novel functional index, aortic-valve-coefficient, for assessing aortic-stenosis in patients undergoing TAVR: A prospective-pilot study.

IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Shreyash M Manegaonkar, Rishi Sukhija, Mohamed A Effat, Marepalli Rao, Rupak K Banerjee
{"title":"A novel functional index, aortic-valve-coefficient, for assessing aortic-stenosis in patients undergoing TAVR: A prospective-pilot study.","authors":"Shreyash M Manegaonkar, Rishi Sukhija, Mohamed A Effat, Marepalli Rao, Rupak K Banerjee","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluating the severity of aortic stenosis (AS) can be challenging, particularly in patients with low-gradient (LG, Δp < 40 mmHg) AS.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to improve the accuracy of assessing severity of AS using a novel functional index- Aortic Valve Coefficient (AVC). The AVC is defined as ratio of mean transvalvular pressure-drop (Δp) to the proximal dynamic pressure (1/2 × blood density × V<sub>LVOT</sub><sup>2</sup>; V<sub>LVOT</sub>: left ventricular outflow tract peak velocity).</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>AVC, developed from fundamental fluid dynamic principles, is a better index for accessing AS severity as it incorporates square of V<sub>LVOT</sub> and downstream pressure recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This pilot prospective study enrolled 47 patients undergoing TAVR for AS. Using cardiac-catheterization-measured Δp and echocardiography-Doppler-derived V<sub>LVOT</sub>, AVC was evaluated. Pre- and post-TAVR pressure-velocity measurements were obtained, resulting in a dataset with 78 data points, including 32 data points specifically linked to LG AS. Linear regression analysis was performed to correlate AVC with Δp, V<sub>LVOT</sub> and aortic-valve-area. Welch 2-sample t-test was carried out to compare the means of AVC against aortic-valve-area.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Moderate correlation (r = 0.85) was observed between AVC and aortic-valve-area indicating AVC could be a prospective index. However, correlation decreased (r = 0.75) in LG AS patients, indicating increased discordancy. Comparing AVC and aortic-valve-area in LG AS patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50 % and LVEF ≥50 %, t-test showed that AVC values are significantly different (p < 0.05) as compared to aortic-valve-area (p = 0.48).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AVC, a novel index, has the potential to improve assessment of AS severity and clinical decision making for treating patients with AS.</p><p><strong>Condensed abstract: </strong>Complex hemodynamics, such as paradoxical \"low-flow low-gradient (LG)\" Aortic stenosis (AS) can be difficult to diagnose. Currently, mean transvalvular pressure-drop and flow-derived aortic-valve-area assess AS severity. Aortic valve coefficient (AVC) is a novel index which combines both pressure-drop and flow measurements to assess the severity of AS. A total of 47 patients (72 data points) were studied undergoing TAVR. In LG AS patients, t-test comparing left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50 % and LVEF ≥50 % showed that AVC are significantly different (p < 0.05) as compared to aortic-valve-area (p = 0.48). Therefore, AVC could be a better index.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2024.08.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evaluating the severity of aortic stenosis (AS) can be challenging, particularly in patients with low-gradient (LG, Δp < 40 mmHg) AS.

Objective: This study aims to improve the accuracy of assessing severity of AS using a novel functional index- Aortic Valve Coefficient (AVC). The AVC is defined as ratio of mean transvalvular pressure-drop (Δp) to the proximal dynamic pressure (1/2 × blood density × VLVOT2; VLVOT: left ventricular outflow tract peak velocity).

Hypothesis: AVC, developed from fundamental fluid dynamic principles, is a better index for accessing AS severity as it incorporates square of VLVOT and downstream pressure recovery.

Methods: This pilot prospective study enrolled 47 patients undergoing TAVR for AS. Using cardiac-catheterization-measured Δp and echocardiography-Doppler-derived VLVOT, AVC was evaluated. Pre- and post-TAVR pressure-velocity measurements were obtained, resulting in a dataset with 78 data points, including 32 data points specifically linked to LG AS. Linear regression analysis was performed to correlate AVC with Δp, VLVOT and aortic-valve-area. Welch 2-sample t-test was carried out to compare the means of AVC against aortic-valve-area.

Results: Moderate correlation (r = 0.85) was observed between AVC and aortic-valve-area indicating AVC could be a prospective index. However, correlation decreased (r = 0.75) in LG AS patients, indicating increased discordancy. Comparing AVC and aortic-valve-area in LG AS patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50 % and LVEF ≥50 %, t-test showed that AVC values are significantly different (p < 0.05) as compared to aortic-valve-area (p = 0.48).

Conclusion: AVC, a novel index, has the potential to improve assessment of AS severity and clinical decision making for treating patients with AS.

Condensed abstract: Complex hemodynamics, such as paradoxical "low-flow low-gradient (LG)" Aortic stenosis (AS) can be difficult to diagnose. Currently, mean transvalvular pressure-drop and flow-derived aortic-valve-area assess AS severity. Aortic valve coefficient (AVC) is a novel index which combines both pressure-drop and flow measurements to assess the severity of AS. A total of 47 patients (72 data points) were studied undergoing TAVR. In LG AS patients, t-test comparing left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50 % and LVEF ≥50 % showed that AVC are significantly different (p < 0.05) as compared to aortic-valve-area (p = 0.48). Therefore, AVC could be a better index.

用于评估接受 TAVR 患者主动脉瓣狭窄的新型功能指数--主动脉瓣系数:一项前瞻性试点研究。
背景:评估主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)的严重程度具有挑战性,尤其是在低梯度(LG,Δp)患者中:本研究旨在使用一种新型功能性指标--主动脉瓣系数(AVC)来提高评估主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的准确性。AVC 的定义是平均跨瓣压降(Δp)与近端动态压力(1/2 × 血液密度 × VLVOT2;VLVOT:左室流出道峰值速度)之比:假设:根据流体动力学基本原理开发的AVC是评估强直性脊柱炎严重程度的更好指标,因为它包含了VLVOT的平方和下游压力恢复:这项试验性前瞻性研究招募了 47 名因 AS 而接受 TAVR 的患者。方法:这项试验性前瞻性研究共纳入了 47 名因 AS 而接受 TAVR 的患者,使用心脏导管测量的 Δp 和超声心动图-多普勒衍生的 VLVOT 对 AVC 进行了评估。TAVR前和TAVR后的压力-速度测量结果产生了一个包含78个数据点的数据集,其中包括32个与LG AS特别相关的数据点。进行了线性回归分析,将 AVC 与 Δp、VLVOT 和主动脉瓣面积相关联。对 AVC 与主动脉瓣面积的平均值进行了韦尔奇 2 样本 t 检验:结果:AVC 与主动脉瓣面积之间存在适度的相关性(r = 0.85),表明 AVC 可以作为一种前瞻性指标。然而,LG AS 患者的相关性降低(r = 0.75),表明不一致性增加。比较左心室射血分数(LVEF)的 LG AS 患者的 AVC 和主动脉瓣面积 结论:AVC作为一项新指标,有可能改善对AS严重程度的评估和治疗AS患者的临床决策。主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)很难诊断。目前,平均跨瓣压降和血流衍生的主动脉瓣面积可评估主动脉瓣狭窄的严重程度。主动脉瓣系数(AVC)是一种新型指数,它结合了压降和血流测量来评估主动脉瓣狭窄的严重程度。共对 47 名接受 TAVR 的患者(72 个数据点)进行了研究。在LG AS患者中,比较左心室射血分数(LVEF)的t检验结果为:LVEF(左心室射血分数)高于AVC(左心室射血分数)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
687
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine (CRM) is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to revascularization therapies in cardiovascular medicine. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine publishes articles related to preclinical work and molecular interventions, including angiogenesis, cell therapy, pharmacological interventions, restenosis management, and prevention, including experiments conducted in human subjects, in laboratory animals, and in vitro. Specific areas of interest include percutaneous angioplasty in coronary and peripheral arteries, intervention in structural heart disease, cardiovascular surgery, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信