Fractionation dose optimization facilities the implementation of transmission proton FLASH-RT.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Yiling Zeng, Qi Zhang, Bo Pang, Muyu Liu, Yu Chang, Ye Wang, Hong Quan, Zhiyong Yang
{"title":"Fractionation dose optimization facilities the implementation of transmission proton FLASH-RT.","authors":"Yiling Zeng, Qi Zhang, Bo Pang, Muyu Liu, Yu Chang, Ye Wang, Hong Quan, Zhiyong Yang","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/ad75e3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>The beam switching time and fractional dose influence the FLASH effect. A single-beam-per-fraction (SBPF) scheme using uniform fractional dose (UFD) has been proposed for FLASH- radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) to eliminate the beam switching time. Based on SBPF schemes, a fractionation dose optimization algorithm is proposed to optimize non-UFD plans to maximize the fractionation effect and dose-dependent FLASH effect.<i>Approach.</i>The UFD plan, containing five 236 MeV transmission proton beams, was optimized for 11 patients with peripheral lung cancer, with each beam delivering a uniform dose of 11 Gy to the target. Meanwhile, the non-UFD plan was optimized using fractionation dose optimization. To compare the two plans, the equivalent dose to 2 Gy (EQD2) for the target and normal tissues was calculated with an<i>α</i>/<i>β</i>ratio of 10 and 3, respectively. Both UFD and non-UFD plans ensured that the target received an EQD2 of 96.3 Gy. To investigate the overall improvement in normal tissue sparing with the non-UFD plan, the FLASH-enhanced EQD2 was calculated.<i>Main results.</i>The fractional doses in non-UFD plans ranged between 5.0 Gy and 24.2 Gy. No significant differences were found in EQD2<sub>2%</sub>and EQD2<sub>98%</sub>of targets between UFD and non-UFD plans. However, the<i>D</i><sub>95%</sub>of the target in non-UFD plans was significantly reduced by 15.1%. The sparing effect in non-UFD plans was significantly improved. The FLASH-enhanced EQD2<sub>mean</sub>in normal tissue and ipsilateral lung was significantly reduced by 3.5% and 10.4%, respectively, in non-UFD plans. The overall improvement is attributed to both the FLASH and fractionation effects.<i>Significance.</i>The fractionation dose optimization can address the limitation of multiple-beam FLASH-RT and utilize the relationship between fractional dose and FLASH effect. Consequently, the non-UFD scheme results in further improvements in normal tissue sparing compared to the UFD scheme, attributed to enhanced fractionation and FLASH effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad75e3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective.The beam switching time and fractional dose influence the FLASH effect. A single-beam-per-fraction (SBPF) scheme using uniform fractional dose (UFD) has been proposed for FLASH- radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) to eliminate the beam switching time. Based on SBPF schemes, a fractionation dose optimization algorithm is proposed to optimize non-UFD plans to maximize the fractionation effect and dose-dependent FLASH effect.Approach.The UFD plan, containing five 236 MeV transmission proton beams, was optimized for 11 patients with peripheral lung cancer, with each beam delivering a uniform dose of 11 Gy to the target. Meanwhile, the non-UFD plan was optimized using fractionation dose optimization. To compare the two plans, the equivalent dose to 2 Gy (EQD2) for the target and normal tissues was calculated with anα/βratio of 10 and 3, respectively. Both UFD and non-UFD plans ensured that the target received an EQD2 of 96.3 Gy. To investigate the overall improvement in normal tissue sparing with the non-UFD plan, the FLASH-enhanced EQD2 was calculated.Main results.The fractional doses in non-UFD plans ranged between 5.0 Gy and 24.2 Gy. No significant differences were found in EQD22%and EQD298%of targets between UFD and non-UFD plans. However, theD95%of the target in non-UFD plans was significantly reduced by 15.1%. The sparing effect in non-UFD plans was significantly improved. The FLASH-enhanced EQD2meanin normal tissue and ipsilateral lung was significantly reduced by 3.5% and 10.4%, respectively, in non-UFD plans. The overall improvement is attributed to both the FLASH and fractionation effects.Significance.The fractionation dose optimization can address the limitation of multiple-beam FLASH-RT and utilize the relationship between fractional dose and FLASH effect. Consequently, the non-UFD scheme results in further improvements in normal tissue sparing compared to the UFD scheme, attributed to enhanced fractionation and FLASH effects.

实施透射质子 FLASH-RT 的分馏剂量优化设施。
目的:光束切换时间和分数剂量会影响 FLASH 效果。针对 FLASH-RT 提出了一种使用均匀分数剂量(UFD)的单束每分数(SBPF)方案,以消除束切换时间。在 SBPF 方案的基础上,提出了一种分馏剂量优化算法,用于优化非均匀分馏剂量(non-UFD)计划,以最大限度地提高分馏效果和剂量相关的 FLASH 效果:为11名周围型肺癌患者优化了包含5束236MeV透射质子束的UFD计划,每束质子束向靶点提供11Gy的均匀剂量。与此同时,还采用了分次剂量优化法对非 UFD 方案进行了优化。为了比较这两种方案,计算了靶组织和正常组织的2 Gy当量剂量(EQD2),α/β比值分别为10和3。UFD 和非 UFD 计划都确保了靶组织获得 96.3 Gy 的 EQD2。为了研究非 UFD 方案在疏通正常组织方面的整体改善情况,计算了 FLASH 增强 EQD2:非 UFD 计划的部分剂量介于 5.0 Gy 和 24.2 Gy 之间。在 UFD 和非 UFD 计划中,目标的 EQD22% 和 EQD298% 没有发现明显差异。但是,非超常脱发计划的目标 D95% 显著降低了 15.1%。非 UFD 计划的疏导效果明显改善。在非 UFD 计划中,正常组织和同侧肺的 FLASH 增强 EQD2 平均值分别显著降低了 3.5% 和 10.4%。总体改善归因于 FLASH 和分馏效应:分馏剂量优化可以解决多束 FLASH-RT 的局限性,并利用分馏剂量与 FLASH 效应之间的关系。因此,与 UFD 方案相比,非 UFD 方案由于增强了分馏和 FLASH 效应,进一步改善了对正常组织的保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics in medicine and biology
Physics in medicine and biology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
409
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信