NANO-LM: An updated scorecard for the clinical assessment of patients with leptomeningeal metastases.

IF 16.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Emilie Le Rhun, Lakshmi Nayak, Mary Jane Lim-Fat, Roberta Rudà, Elena Pentsova, Peter Forsyth, Barbara J O'Brien, Matthias Preusser, Priya Kumthekar, Dieta Brandsma, Michael Weller
{"title":"NANO-LM: An updated scorecard for the clinical assessment of patients with leptomeningeal metastases.","authors":"Emilie Le Rhun, Lakshmi Nayak, Mary Jane Lim-Fat, Roberta Rudà, Elena Pentsova, Peter Forsyth, Barbara J O'Brien, Matthias Preusser, Priya Kumthekar, Dieta Brandsma, Michael Weller","doi":"10.1093/neuonc/noae171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are no validated tools for the clinical neurological assessment of patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LM). However, clinical examination during the course of the disease guides medical management and is part of response assessment in clinical trials. Because neuroimaging may not always be obtained owing to rapid clinical deterioration, clinical neurological assessment of LM is essential, and standardization Is important to minimize rater disagreement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The RANO-LM group launched a 2-steps process, aiming at improving and standardizing the clinical assessment of patients with LM. We report here on the first step: the establishment of a consensus scorecard. The task force had 9 virtual meetings to define general recommendations on neurological assessment and selected domains of interest that should be tested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen domains of neurological symptoms and signs were selected: level of consciousness, cognition, nausea and vomiting, vision, eye movement, facial strength, hearing, swallowing, speech, limb strength, limb ataxia, walking, bladder bowel functions. For each item, a clear instruction on how to perform the assessment is provided with scoring criteria between 0 and 2. The general clinical status of the patient and use of steroids, pain medications, and anti-emetics should be documented. Neurological sequelae from previous brain metastases or cancer treatment should be rated at the baseline evaluation; it should be specified when symptoms or signs may be related to a condition other than LM.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A revised NANO-LM consensus scorecard for clinical assessment has been established. An international prospective validation study of the proposal is currently ongoing (NCT06417710).</p>","PeriodicalId":19377,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae171","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are no validated tools for the clinical neurological assessment of patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LM). However, clinical examination during the course of the disease guides medical management and is part of response assessment in clinical trials. Because neuroimaging may not always be obtained owing to rapid clinical deterioration, clinical neurological assessment of LM is essential, and standardization Is important to minimize rater disagreement.

Methods: The RANO-LM group launched a 2-steps process, aiming at improving and standardizing the clinical assessment of patients with LM. We report here on the first step: the establishment of a consensus scorecard. The task force had 9 virtual meetings to define general recommendations on neurological assessment and selected domains of interest that should be tested.

Results: Fourteen domains of neurological symptoms and signs were selected: level of consciousness, cognition, nausea and vomiting, vision, eye movement, facial strength, hearing, swallowing, speech, limb strength, limb ataxia, walking, bladder bowel functions. For each item, a clear instruction on how to perform the assessment is provided with scoring criteria between 0 and 2. The general clinical status of the patient and use of steroids, pain medications, and anti-emetics should be documented. Neurological sequelae from previous brain metastases or cancer treatment should be rated at the baseline evaluation; it should be specified when symptoms or signs may be related to a condition other than LM.

Discussion: A revised NANO-LM consensus scorecard for clinical assessment has been established. An international prospective validation study of the proposal is currently ongoing (NCT06417710).

NANO-LM:用于脑膜外转移患者临床评估的最新记分卡。
背景:目前还没有经过验证的工具可用于对脑左侧转移瘤(LM)患者进行临床神经学评估。然而,病程中的临床检查可指导医疗管理,也是临床试验中反应评估的一部分。由于临床病情迅速恶化,神经影像学检查并不总能获得,因此LM的临床神经学评估至关重要,而标准化检查对于减少评分者的意见分歧非常重要:RANO-LM小组发起了一个分两步走的过程,旨在改进和规范LM患者的临床评估。我们在此报告第一步:建立共识记分卡。该工作组召开了 9 次虚拟会议,以确定神经系统评估的一般建议,并选定应进行测试的相关领域:结果:选定了 14 个神经症状和体征领域:意识水平、认知、恶心和呕吐、视力、眼球运动、面部力量、听力、吞咽、言语、肢体力量、肢体共济失调、行走、膀胱和肠道功能。每个项目都有明确的评估说明,评分标准介于 0 和 2 之间。应记录患者的一般临床状况以及类固醇、止痛药和止吐药的使用情况。既往脑转移或癌症治疗引起的神经系统后遗症应在基线评估时进行评分;当症状或体征可能与 LM 以外的其他疾病相关时,应明确说明:经修订的 NANO-LM 临床评估共识记分卡已经建立。目前正在对该建议进行国际前瞻性验证研究(NCT06417710)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuro-oncology
Neuro-oncology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
27.20
自引率
6.30%
发文量
1434
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuro-Oncology, the official journal of the Society for Neuro-Oncology, has been published monthly since January 2010. Affiliated with the Japan Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology, it is a global leader in the field. The journal is committed to swiftly disseminating high-quality information across all areas of neuro-oncology. It features peer-reviewed articles, reviews, symposia on various topics, abstracts from annual meetings, and updates from neuro-oncology societies worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信