Phrenic neuropathy etiologies and recovery trajectories in outpatient rehabilitation and neuromuscular medicine clinics: A retrospective analysis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Muscle & Nerve Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1002/mus.28240
Nicholas Demetriou, Alexandra S Jensen, Ellen Farr, Shreyaa Khanna, John M Coleman, Senda Ajroud-Driss, Adenike A Adewuyi, Lisa F Wolfe, Colin K Franz
{"title":"Phrenic neuropathy etiologies and recovery trajectories in outpatient rehabilitation and neuromuscular medicine clinics: A retrospective analysis.","authors":"Nicholas Demetriou, Alexandra S Jensen, Ellen Farr, Shreyaa Khanna, John M Coleman, Senda Ajroud-Driss, Adenike A Adewuyi, Lisa F Wolfe, Colin K Franz","doi":"10.1002/mus.28240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/aims: </strong>Phrenic neuropathy (PhN) impairs diaphragm muscle function, causing a spectrum of breathing disability. PhN etiologies and their natural history are ill-defined. This knowledge gap hinders informed prognosis and management decisions. This study aims to help fill this knowledge gap on PhN etiologies, outcomes, and recovery patterns, especially in the context of nonsurgical clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study from two interdisciplinary clinics, physiatry and neurology based. Patients were included if PhN was identified, and other causes of hemi-diaphragm muscle dysfunction excluded. Patients were followed serially at the discretion of the neuromuscular-trained neurologist or physiatrist. Recovery was assessed using pulmonary function tests (PFTs), diaphragm muscle ultrasound (US) thickening ratio, and patient-reported outcomes in patients presenting within 2 years of PhN onset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 151 patients with PhN. The most common etiologies were idiopathic (27%), associated with cardiothoracic procedure (24%), and intensive care unit (17%). Of these patients, 117 (77%) were evaluated within 2 years of PhN onset. Of patients included in outcome analyses, 64% saw improvement on serial US, 50% on serial PFTs and 79% reported symptomatic improvement at an average of 15, 16, and 17 months, respectively.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A clear majority of PhN patients show improvement in diaphragm muscle function, but on average, improvements took 15-17 months depending on the assessment type. These insights are vital for developing tailored treatments and can guide physicians in prognosis and decision-making, especially if more invasive interventions are being considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":18968,"journal":{"name":"Muscle & Nerve","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muscle & Nerve","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.28240","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/aims: Phrenic neuropathy (PhN) impairs diaphragm muscle function, causing a spectrum of breathing disability. PhN etiologies and their natural history are ill-defined. This knowledge gap hinders informed prognosis and management decisions. This study aims to help fill this knowledge gap on PhN etiologies, outcomes, and recovery patterns, especially in the context of nonsurgical clinical practice.

Methods: This was a retrospective study from two interdisciplinary clinics, physiatry and neurology based. Patients were included if PhN was identified, and other causes of hemi-diaphragm muscle dysfunction excluded. Patients were followed serially at the discretion of the neuromuscular-trained neurologist or physiatrist. Recovery was assessed using pulmonary function tests (PFTs), diaphragm muscle ultrasound (US) thickening ratio, and patient-reported outcomes in patients presenting within 2 years of PhN onset.

Results: We identified 151 patients with PhN. The most common etiologies were idiopathic (27%), associated with cardiothoracic procedure (24%), and intensive care unit (17%). Of these patients, 117 (77%) were evaluated within 2 years of PhN onset. Of patients included in outcome analyses, 64% saw improvement on serial US, 50% on serial PFTs and 79% reported symptomatic improvement at an average of 15, 16, and 17 months, respectively.

Discussion: A clear majority of PhN patients show improvement in diaphragm muscle function, but on average, improvements took 15-17 months depending on the assessment type. These insights are vital for developing tailored treatments and can guide physicians in prognosis and decision-making, especially if more invasive interventions are being considered.

康复和神经肌肉医学门诊中的膈神经病病因和康复轨迹:回顾性分析。
导言/目的:膈神经病变(PhN)会损害膈肌功能,导致一系列呼吸障碍。膈神经病的病因及其自然史尚不明确。这一知识空白阻碍了知情预后和管理决策。本研究旨在帮助填补有关 PhN 病因、结果和恢复模式的知识空白,尤其是在非手术临床实践中:这是一项回顾性研究,来自两个跨学科诊所,分别是物理治疗诊所和神经病学诊所。如果确定患者患有膈肌功能障碍,则将其纳入研究范围,并排除其他导致半膈肌功能障碍的原因。由受过神经肌肉训练的神经科医生或物理治疗师决定对患者进行连续随访。通过肺功能测试(PFT)、膈肌超声波(US)增厚比值和患者报告结果来评估 PhN 发病 2 年内患者的恢复情况:我们发现了 151 名 PhN 患者。最常见的病因是特发性(27%)、心胸手术相关(24%)和重症监护室(17%)。在这些患者中,有 117 人(77%)在 PhN 发病两年内接受了评估。在纳入结果分析的患者中,64%的患者在连续的US检查中有所改善,50%的患者在连续的PFT检查中有所改善,79%的患者在平均15个月、16个月和17个月后报告症状有所改善:讨论:大多数 PhN 患者的膈肌功能明显改善,但根据评估类型的不同,平均需要 15-17 个月才能改善。这些见解对于开发有针对性的治疗方法至关重要,并能指导医生进行预后判断和决策,尤其是在考虑采取更具侵入性的干预措施时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Muscle & Nerve
Muscle & Nerve 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
287
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Muscle & Nerve is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions, in both health and disease, concerning studies of the muscle, the neuromuscular junction, the peripheral motor, sensory and autonomic neurons, and the central nervous system where the behavior of the peripheral nervous system is clarified. Appearing monthly, Muscle & Nerve publishes clinical studies and clinically relevant research reports in the fields of anatomy, biochemistry, cell biology, electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, toxicology, and virology. The Journal welcomes articles and reports on basic clinical electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis. We expedite some papers dealing with timely topics to keep up with the fast-moving pace of science, based on the referees'' recommendation.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信