Assessing shared psychological constructs as risk factors in comorbid PTSD-AUD combat-exposed male veterans.

IF 1.1 4区心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Military Psychology Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1080/08995605.2024.2387914

Angela J Zaur, Silviu A Bacanu, Ananda B Amstadter, Christina M Sheerin

{"title":"Assessing shared psychological constructs as risk factors in comorbid PTSD-AUD combat-exposed male veterans.","authors":"Angela J Zaur, Silviu A Bacanu, Ananda B Amstadter, Christina M Sheerin","doi":"10.1080/08995605.2024.2387914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PTSD and AUD are frequently comorbid post-trauma outcomes. Much remains unknown about shared risk factors as PTSD and AUD work tends to be conducted in isolation. We examined how self-report measures of distress tolerance (DT), experiential avoidance (EA), and drinking motives (DM) differed across diagnostic groups in white, male combat-exposed veterans (n = 77). A MANOVA indicated a significant difference in constructs by group, F (5, 210) = 4.7, p = <.001. Follow-up ANOVAs indicated DM subscales (Coping: F (3,82) = 21.3; Social: F (3,82) = 13.1; Enhancement: F (3,82) = 10.4; ps = <.001) and EA (F (3,73) = 7.8, p < .001) differed by groups but not DT. Post hoc comparisons indicated that mean scores of the comorbid and AUD-only groups were significantly higher than controls for all DM subscales (all ps < .01). EA scores were significantly higher for the comorbid as compared to control (p < .001) and PTS-only (p = .007) groups. Findings support shared psychological factors in a comorbid PTSD-AUD population.","PeriodicalId":18696,"journal":{"name":"Military Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2024.2387914","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

PTSD and AUD are frequently comorbid post-trauma outcomes. Much remains unknown about shared risk factors as PTSD and AUD work tends to be conducted in isolation. We examined how self-report measures of distress tolerance (DT), experiential avoidance (EA), and drinking motives (DM) differed across diagnostic groups in white, male combat-exposed veterans (n = 77). A MANOVA indicated a significant difference in constructs by group, F (5, 210) = 4.7, p = <.001. Follow-up ANOVAs indicated DM subscales (Coping: F (3,82) = 21.3; Social: F (3,82) = 13.1; Enhancement: F (3,82) = 10.4; ps = <.001) and EA (F (3,73) = 7.8, p < .001) differed by groups but not DT. Post hoc comparisons indicated that mean scores of the comorbid and AUD-only groups were significantly higher than controls for all DM subscales (all ps < .01). EA scores were significantly higher for the comorbid as compared to control (p < .001) and PTS-only (p = .007) groups. Findings support shared psychological factors in a comorbid PTSD-AUD population.

查看原文本刊更多论文

评估创伤后应激障碍--自闭症--战斗暴露男性退伍军人中作为风险因素的共同心理结构。

创伤后应激障碍（PTSD）和情感障碍（AUD）是创伤后的常见并发症。由于创伤后应激障碍和 AUD 的研究往往是孤立进行的，因此人们对这两种疾病的共同风险因素仍然知之甚少。我们研究了白人男性退伍军人（n = 77）在不同诊断组别中对痛苦耐受（DT）、体验性回避（EA）和饮酒动机（DM）的自我报告测量结果的差异。MANOVA 分析表明，不同组别之间的建构存在显著差异（F (5, 210) = 4.7, p = p p = .007）。研究结果支持创伤后应激障碍和自闭症并发人群的共同心理因素。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Military Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

18.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： Military Psychology is the quarterly journal of Division 19 (Society for Military Psychology) of the American Psychological Association. The journal seeks to facilitate the scientific development of military psychology by encouraging communication between researchers and practitioners. The domain of military psychology is the conduct of research or practice of psychological principles within a military environment. The journal publishes behavioral science research articles having military applications in the areas of clinical and health psychology, training and human factors, manpower and personnel, social and organizational systems, and testing and measurement.