Appropriate timing for the removal of urinary catheters in gastrointestinal surgery with epidural anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Teppei Miyakawa, Michitaka Honda, Hidetaka Kawamura, Ryuya Yamamoto, Satoshi Toshiyama, Ryutaro Mashiko, Hirohito Kakinuma, Soshi Hori, Eiichi Nakao, Yukitoshi Todate, Yoshinao Takano, Koji Kono
{"title":"Appropriate timing for the removal of urinary catheters in gastrointestinal surgery with epidural anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Teppei Miyakawa, Michitaka Honda, Hidetaka Kawamura, Ryuya Yamamoto, Satoshi Toshiyama, Ryutaro Mashiko, Hirohito Kakinuma, Soshi Hori, Eiichi Nakao, Yukitoshi Todate, Yoshinao Takano, Koji Kono","doi":"10.1007/s00423-024-03461-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate whether early urinary catheter removal is feasible during epidural anesthesia during gastrointestinal surgery in male patients at high risk for urinary retention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Male patients who underwent radical surgery for gastric or colon cancer were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized 1:1 into 2 groups: the early group, in which the urinary catheter was removed before removal of the epidural catheter on the second or third postoperative day, and the late group, in which the urinary catheter was removed after removal of the epidural catheter. The randomization adjustment factors were age (≥ 65 or < 65 years) and operative site (gastric or colon). The primary endpoint was urinary retention. The secondary endpoints were the incidence of urinary tract infection and length of postoperative hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-three patients were enrolled between March 2020 and February 2024 and assigned to the Early (n = 37) and Late (n = 36) groups. Four patients withdrew their consent after randomization. The intention-to-treat analysis showed that urinary retention occurred in 4 patients (11.1%) in the early group and 1 patient (3.0%) in the late group (P = 0.20). Urinary tract infection occurred in 1 patient (3.0%) in the late group. The median postoperative hospital stay was 9 days in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early urinary catheter removal in male patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery with epidural anesthesia could increase urinary retention within the expected acceptable range.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>UMIN000040468, Date of registration: May 21, 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03461-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate whether early urinary catheter removal is feasible during epidural anesthesia during gastrointestinal surgery in male patients at high risk for urinary retention.

Methods: Male patients who underwent radical surgery for gastric or colon cancer were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized 1:1 into 2 groups: the early group, in which the urinary catheter was removed before removal of the epidural catheter on the second or third postoperative day, and the late group, in which the urinary catheter was removed after removal of the epidural catheter. The randomization adjustment factors were age (≥ 65 or < 65 years) and operative site (gastric or colon). The primary endpoint was urinary retention. The secondary endpoints were the incidence of urinary tract infection and length of postoperative hospital stay.

Results: Seventy-three patients were enrolled between March 2020 and February 2024 and assigned to the Early (n = 37) and Late (n = 36) groups. Four patients withdrew their consent after randomization. The intention-to-treat analysis showed that urinary retention occurred in 4 patients (11.1%) in the early group and 1 patient (3.0%) in the late group (P = 0.20). Urinary tract infection occurred in 1 patient (3.0%) in the late group. The median postoperative hospital stay was 9 days in both groups.

Conclusion: Early urinary catheter removal in male patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery with epidural anesthesia could increase urinary retention within the expected acceptable range.

Trial registration number: UMIN000040468, Date of registration: May 21, 2020.

Abstract Image

硬膜外麻醉胃肠道手术中拔除导尿管的适当时机:随机对照试验。
目的:这项随机对照试验的目的是评估在胃肠道手术中进行硬膜外麻醉时,是否可以为尿潴留高风险男性患者及早拔除导尿管:这项随机对照试验招募了接受胃癌或结肠癌根治术的男性患者。患者按 1:1 随机分为两组:早期组,即在术后第二天或第三天拔除硬膜外导管前拔除导尿管;晚期组,即在拔除硬膜外导管后拔除导尿管。随机化调整因素为年龄(≥ 65 或 结果:73 名患者于 2020 年 3 月至 2024 年 2 月期间入组,并被分配到早期组(37 人)和晚期组(36 人)。四名患者在随机分组后撤回同意书。意向治疗分析显示,早期组有 4 名患者(11.1%)发生尿潴留,晚期组有 1 名患者(3.0%)发生尿潴留(P = 0.20)。晚期组有 1 名患者(3.0%)发生了尿路感染。两组患者术后住院时间的中位数均为 9 天:结论:硬膜外麻醉下接受胃肠道手术的男性患者尽早拔除导尿管可增加尿潴留,使其处于预期的可接受范围内:UMIN000040468,注册日期:2020年5月21日:注册日期:2020年5月21日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信