Current use of patient-reported outcome measures by musculoskeletal physiotherapists in Portugal.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Ruben Santos, Diogo Pires
{"title":"Current use of patient-reported outcome measures by musculoskeletal physiotherapists in Portugal.","authors":"Ruben Santos, Diogo Pires","doi":"10.3233/BMR-230208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Musculoskeletal conditions are the leading cause of disability, requiring continuous outcome measurement, including the utilization of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aims of the study were a) to characterize the use PROMs by Portuguese physiotherapists in patients with musculoskeletal conditions; b) to analyze the associated factors of their use and; c) to identify the barriers and facilitators to their implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey was carried out with musculoskeletal physiotherapists working in Portugal. Closed questions were used to describe the use of PROMs. The factors associated with the non-use of PROMs were analysed through logistic regression models (p= 0.05). Barriers and facilitators were assessed through open questions and analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and fifty-six physiotherapists answered the online survey. Most physiotherapists do not use outcome measures consistently and physical tests are often chosen (70.5%) over PROMs (17.3%). The work sector (p= 0.01; p= 0.015; p= 0.009). the workplace stimulus (p= 0.001) and the physiotherapists' knowledge about PROMs (p= 0.017) were identified as factors associated with the non-use of PROMs. Barriers and facilitators to the use of PROMs are related to physiotherapists' skills, the patients' characteristics, the workplace conditions, and the instruments' characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed the poor use of PROMs by musculoskeletal physiotherapists and identified the associated factors, barriers, and facilitators that should be considered to increase its future use by musculoskeletal physiotherapists in Portugal.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-230208","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Musculoskeletal conditions are the leading cause of disability, requiring continuous outcome measurement, including the utilization of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Objective: The aims of the study were a) to characterize the use PROMs by Portuguese physiotherapists in patients with musculoskeletal conditions; b) to analyze the associated factors of their use and; c) to identify the barriers and facilitators to their implementation.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was carried out with musculoskeletal physiotherapists working in Portugal. Closed questions were used to describe the use of PROMs. The factors associated with the non-use of PROMs were analysed through logistic regression models (p= 0.05). Barriers and facilitators were assessed through open questions and analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: One hundred and fifty-six physiotherapists answered the online survey. Most physiotherapists do not use outcome measures consistently and physical tests are often chosen (70.5%) over PROMs (17.3%). The work sector (p= 0.01; p= 0.015; p= 0.009). the workplace stimulus (p= 0.001) and the physiotherapists' knowledge about PROMs (p= 0.017) were identified as factors associated with the non-use of PROMs. Barriers and facilitators to the use of PROMs are related to physiotherapists' skills, the patients' characteristics, the workplace conditions, and the instruments' characteristics.

Conclusion: This study showed the poor use of PROMs by musculoskeletal physiotherapists and identified the associated factors, barriers, and facilitators that should be considered to increase its future use by musculoskeletal physiotherapists in Portugal.

葡萄牙肌肉骨骼理疗师目前对患者报告结果测量方法的使用情况。
背景:肌肉骨骼疾病是导致残疾的主要原因,需要进行连续的结果测量,包括利用患者报告结果测量(PROMs):肌肉骨骼疾病是导致残疾的主要原因,需要进行持续的结果测量,包括使用患者报告的结果测量(PROMs):研究目的:a) 描述葡萄牙物理治疗师对肌肉骨骼疾病患者使用 PROMs 的情况;b) 分析使用 PROMs 的相关因素;c) 确定实施 PROMs 的障碍和促进因素:方法:对在葡萄牙工作的肌肉骨骼理疗师进行了横向在线调查。采用封闭式问题来描述 PROMs 的使用情况。通过逻辑回归模型分析了不使用 PROMs 的相关因素(P= 0.05)。通过开放式问题对障碍和促进因素进行评估,并采用专题分析法进行分析:156名物理治疗师回答了在线调查。大多数物理治疗师并没有坚持使用结果测量法,通常选择物理测试(70.5%)而非 PROMs(17.3%)。工作部门(p= 0.01;p= 0.015;p= 0.009)、工作场所刺激(p= 0.001)和物理治疗师对 PROMs 的了解(p= 0.017)被认为是不使用 PROMs 的相关因素。使用 PROMs 的障碍和促进因素与物理治疗师的技能、患者特征、工作场所条件和工具特征有关:本研究表明,肌肉骨骼物理治疗师对 PROMs 的使用率较低,并确定了相关因素、障碍和促进因素,葡萄牙肌肉骨骼物理治疗师今后应考虑增加对 PROMs 的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信