Comparison of disease and risk classifications of AML before and after incorporation of NGS analysis of bone marrow samples.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
International Journal of Hematology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1007/s12185-024-03841-w
Hiroyuki Sugiura, Tatsunori Ishikawa, Taiga Kuroi, Sachiyo Okamoto, Naho Nomura, Taro Masunari, Nobuo Sezaki, Seishi Ogawa, Yasuhito Nannya, Masanori Makita
{"title":"Comparison of disease and risk classifications of AML before and after incorporation of NGS analysis of bone marrow samples.","authors":"Hiroyuki Sugiura, Tatsunori Ishikawa, Taiga Kuroi, Sachiyo Okamoto, Naho Nomura, Taro Masunari, Nobuo Sezaki, Seishi Ogawa, Yasuhito Nannya, Masanori Makita","doi":"10.1007/s12185-024-03841-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mutation profiling by next-generation sequencing (NGS) has facilitated understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and has been incorporated into the new disease classification (International Consensus Classification; ICC) and risk classification (European LeukemiaNet [ELN] 2022; ELN2022). We compared disease subtypes between the previous disease classification (4th edition of the WHO classification; WHO-4) and the ICC in 91 patients with AML diagnosed at our institution. We also compared disease risk classifications using the previous risk classification (ELN2017) and the ELN2022. Targeted sequencing of bone marrow samples was conducted at Kyoto University. We found that entities under AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities were well-established, with almost no change from the WHO-4 to the ICC. In contrast, 16.7% of cases of AML, not otherwise specified in the WHO-4 were reclassified into AML with mutated TP53, and 36.7% were reclassified into AML with myelodysplasia-related gene mutations or cytogenetic abnormalities per the ICC. Meanwhile, the ELN2017 and ELN2022 showed no difference in concordance indexes in multivariate Cox regression analysis for progression-free and overall survival. The superiority of the ELN2022 over the ELN2017 could not be confirmed in our single-center retrospective study, and further investigation including multicenter prospective studies is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":13992,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":"594-600"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-024-03841-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mutation profiling by next-generation sequencing (NGS) has facilitated understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and has been incorporated into the new disease classification (International Consensus Classification; ICC) and risk classification (European LeukemiaNet [ELN] 2022; ELN2022). We compared disease subtypes between the previous disease classification (4th edition of the WHO classification; WHO-4) and the ICC in 91 patients with AML diagnosed at our institution. We also compared disease risk classifications using the previous risk classification (ELN2017) and the ELN2022. Targeted sequencing of bone marrow samples was conducted at Kyoto University. We found that entities under AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities were well-established, with almost no change from the WHO-4 to the ICC. In contrast, 16.7% of cases of AML, not otherwise specified in the WHO-4 were reclassified into AML with mutated TP53, and 36.7% were reclassified into AML with myelodysplasia-related gene mutations or cytogenetic abnormalities per the ICC. Meanwhile, the ELN2017 and ELN2022 showed no difference in concordance indexes in multivariate Cox regression analysis for progression-free and overall survival. The superiority of the ELN2022 over the ELN2017 could not be confirmed in our single-center retrospective study, and further investigation including multicenter prospective studies is needed.

Abstract Image

骨髓样本纳入 NGS 分析前后急性髓细胞白血病的疾病和风险分类比较。
通过下一代测序(NGS)进行突变分析有助于了解急性髓性白血病(AML)的分子发病机制,并已被纳入新的疾病分类(国际共识分类;ICC)和风险分类(欧洲白血病网络 [ELN] 2022;ELN2022)。我们对在本院确诊的 91 名急性髓细胞白血病患者的疾病亚型进行了比较,并将以前的疾病分类(第四版世界卫生组织分类;WHO-4)与 ICC 进行了比较。我们还比较了以前的风险分类(ELN2017)和 ELN2022 的疾病风险分类。我们在京都大学对骨髓样本进行了靶向测序。我们发现,具有复发性基因异常的急性髓细胞性白血病的实体已经确立,从WHO-4到ICC几乎没有变化。与此相反,16.7%的WHO-4未另作规定的急性髓细胞性白血病病例被重新分类为TP53突变的急性髓细胞性白血病,36.7%的病例被重新分类为骨髓增生异常相关基因突变或细胞遗传学异常的急性髓细胞性白血病。同时,在无进展生存期和总生存期的多变量Cox回归分析中,ELN2017和ELN2022的一致性指数没有差异。我们的单中心回顾性研究无法证实ELN2022优于ELN2017,因此需要包括多中心前瞻性研究在内的进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
223
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Hematology, the official journal of the Japanese Society of Hematology, has a long history of publishing leading research in hematology. The journal comprises articles that contribute to progress in research not only in basic hematology but also in clinical hematology, aiming to cover all aspects of this field, namely, erythrocytes, leukocytes and hematopoiesis, hemostasis, thrombosis and vascular biology, hematological malignancies, transplantation, and cell therapy. The expanded [Progress in Hematology] section integrates such relevant fields as the cell biology of stem cells and cancer cells, and clinical research in inflammation, cancer, and thrombosis. Reports on results of clinical trials are also included, thus contributing to the aim of fostering communication among researchers in the growing field of modern hematology. The journal provides the best of up-to-date information on modern hematology, presenting readers with high-impact, original work focusing on pivotal issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信