Safety of adenosine for pediatric tachyarrhythmia treatment in the emergency department: a multi-hospital 10-year cross-sectional study.

IF 2 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Melanie M Randall, Tristen Burt, Scott Cruise, Michael K Mesisca, Thomas Minahan
{"title":"Safety of adenosine for pediatric tachyarrhythmia treatment in the emergency department: a multi-hospital 10-year cross-sectional study.","authors":"Melanie M Randall, Tristen Burt, Scott Cruise, Michael K Mesisca, Thomas Minahan","doi":"10.1186/s12245-024-00683-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Supraventricular tachycardia is the most common dysrhythmia in children. Initial vagal maneuvers are successful less than half of the time. Adenosine, a potent AV nodal blocker with a short half-life, is recommended as first line pharmacotherapy. Minor side effects from adenosine are common, but report of serious side effects such as sustained ventricular tachycardia, torsades de pointes, syncope or hypotension are confined to small case series or studies greater than 20 years old. We aimed to specifically identify the incidence of serious side effects of adenosine in children in the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2002 and 2022, all children less than 18 years old who received adenosine for tachyarrhythmia treatment in two emergency departments were included. The electronic record was reviewed for demographic information, patient history, treatments given, and side effects or complications were observed. Electrocardiograms before, during and after adenosine administration were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>77 patients met inclusion criteria. There were 74 patients with an initial rhythm of typical SVT. The other three patients included one with a junctional rhythm, one with atrial fibrillation, and one with an undetermined narrow complex tachycardia. 49 patients had cardiac rhythm monitoring during adenosine administration. 17 of these patients had three or more consecutive ventricular beats following adenosine, however no patients required treatment. No patients had syncope. One patient had brief hypotension after adenosine that normalized without intervention. Four patients were electrically cardioverted after adenosine, all for persistent dysrhythmias: two for persistent SVT with hypotension, one for atrial fibrillation and one for an undetermined rhythm. Twelve patients were placed on continuous antiarrhythmic medication for persistent SVT. Age, gender, prior SVT history, initial adenosine dose, and need for additional doses were not significant risk factors for a prolonged sinus pause or greater than two ventricular beats.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adenosine treatment in typical supraventricular tachycardia in pediatric patients is safe.</p>","PeriodicalId":13967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363447/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-024-00683-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Supraventricular tachycardia is the most common dysrhythmia in children. Initial vagal maneuvers are successful less than half of the time. Adenosine, a potent AV nodal blocker with a short half-life, is recommended as first line pharmacotherapy. Minor side effects from adenosine are common, but report of serious side effects such as sustained ventricular tachycardia, torsades de pointes, syncope or hypotension are confined to small case series or studies greater than 20 years old. We aimed to specifically identify the incidence of serious side effects of adenosine in children in the emergency department.

Methods: Between 2002 and 2022, all children less than 18 years old who received adenosine for tachyarrhythmia treatment in two emergency departments were included. The electronic record was reviewed for demographic information, patient history, treatments given, and side effects or complications were observed. Electrocardiograms before, during and after adenosine administration were reviewed.

Results: 77 patients met inclusion criteria. There were 74 patients with an initial rhythm of typical SVT. The other three patients included one with a junctional rhythm, one with atrial fibrillation, and one with an undetermined narrow complex tachycardia. 49 patients had cardiac rhythm monitoring during adenosine administration. 17 of these patients had three or more consecutive ventricular beats following adenosine, however no patients required treatment. No patients had syncope. One patient had brief hypotension after adenosine that normalized without intervention. Four patients were electrically cardioverted after adenosine, all for persistent dysrhythmias: two for persistent SVT with hypotension, one for atrial fibrillation and one for an undetermined rhythm. Twelve patients were placed on continuous antiarrhythmic medication for persistent SVT. Age, gender, prior SVT history, initial adenosine dose, and need for additional doses were not significant risk factors for a prolonged sinus pause or greater than two ventricular beats.

Conclusions: Adenosine treatment in typical supraventricular tachycardia in pediatric patients is safe.

在急诊科使用腺苷治疗小儿快速性心律失常的安全性:一项为期 10 年的跨医院横断面研究。
背景:室上性心动过速是儿童最常见的心律失常:室上性心动过速是儿童最常见的心律失常。最初的迷走神经操作只有不到一半的成功率。腺苷是一种半衰期较短的强效房室结阻滞剂,被推荐作为一线药物治疗。腺苷的轻微副作用很常见,但严重副作用(如持续性室性心动过速、室性心动过速、晕厥或低血压)的报告仅限于小型病例系列或 20 年以上的研究。我们旨在明确急诊科儿童使用腺苷后严重副作用的发生率:方法:我们纳入了 2002 年至 2022 年间在两个急诊科接受腺苷治疗快速性心律失常的所有 18 岁以下儿童。对电子病历中的人口统计学信息、患者病史、治疗方法、副作用或并发症进行观察。对使用腺苷之前、期间和之后的心电图进行了审查:77 名患者符合纳入标准。其中 74 名患者的初始心律为典型 SVT。另外三名患者包括一名交界性心律、一名心房颤动和一名未确定的窄复律心动过速。49 名患者在服用腺苷期间接受了心律监测。其中 17 名患者在服用腺苷后出现三次或三次以上连续心室搏动,但没有患者需要治疗。没有患者出现晕厥。一名患者在服用腺苷后出现短暂低血压,但无需干预即可恢复正常。四名患者在服用腺苷后进行了电复律,均为持续性心律失常:两名患者为伴有低血压的持续性室上性心动过速,一名患者为心房颤动,一名患者心律未定。有 12 名患者因持续性 SVT 而持续服用抗心律失常药物。年龄、性别、既往 SVT 病史、初始腺苷剂量以及是否需要追加剂量并不是导致窦性停搏时间延长或心室搏动超过两次的重要风险因素:结论:腺苷治疗儿童典型室上性心动过速是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to bring to light the various clinical advancements and research developments attained over the world and thus help the specialty forge ahead. It is directed towards physicians and medical personnel undergoing training or working within the field of Emergency Medicine. Medical students who are interested in pursuing a career in Emergency Medicine will also benefit from the journal. This is particularly useful for trainees in countries where the specialty is still in its infancy. Disciplines covered will include interesting clinical cases, the latest evidence-based practice and research developments in Emergency medicine including emergency pediatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信