Effect of collagen supplementation on knee osteoarthritis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Mario Simental-Mendía, Daniela Ortega-Mata, Carlos A Acosta-Olivo, Luis E Simental-Mendía, Víctor M Peña-Martínez, Félix Vilchez-Cavazos
{"title":"Effect of collagen supplementation on knee osteoarthritis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.","authors":"Mario Simental-Mendía, Daniela Ortega-Mata, Carlos A Acosta-Olivo, Luis E Simental-Mendía, Víctor M Peña-Martínez, Félix Vilchez-Cavazos","doi":"10.55563/clinexprheumatol/kflfr5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the clinical efficacy of collagen-based supplements on knee osteoarthritis (OA) symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Until October 2023, we conducted searches on the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that reported the effects of oral collagen-based supplements on knee OA. Quantitative data from outcomes were pooled using a random- or fixed-effects model (depending on inter-study variability) and the generic inverse variance method. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool was employed to assess the risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This systematic review incorporated information of 870 participants included from 11 RCTs, with 451 allocated to the collagen supplementation group and 419 to the placebo group. The meta-analysis revealed an overall significant improvement of both function [MD, -6.46 (95% CI -9.52, -3.40); I2=75%; p=0.00001] and pain scores [MD, -13.63 (95% CI -20.67, -6.58); I2=88%; p=0.00001], favouring collagen supplementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this meta-analysis suggest that oral collagen administration relieves OA symptoms. Our findings revealed noteworthy improvements, statistically and clinically, in both functional and pain scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":10274,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/kflfr5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the clinical efficacy of collagen-based supplements on knee osteoarthritis (OA) symptoms.

Methods: Until October 2023, we conducted searches on the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that reported the effects of oral collagen-based supplements on knee OA. Quantitative data from outcomes were pooled using a random- or fixed-effects model (depending on inter-study variability) and the generic inverse variance method. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool was employed to assess the risk of bias.

Results: This systematic review incorporated information of 870 participants included from 11 RCTs, with 451 allocated to the collagen supplementation group and 419 to the placebo group. The meta-analysis revealed an overall significant improvement of both function [MD, -6.46 (95% CI -9.52, -3.40); I2=75%; p=0.00001] and pain scores [MD, -13.63 (95% CI -20.67, -6.58); I2=88%; p=0.00001], favouring collagen supplementation.

Conclusions: The results of this meta-analysis suggest that oral collagen administration relieves OA symptoms. Our findings revealed noteworthy improvements, statistically and clinically, in both functional and pain scores.

补充胶原蛋白对膝骨关节炎的影响:随机对照试验的最新系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,评估胶原蛋白补充剂对膝关节骨性关节炎(OA)症状的临床疗效:截至 2023 年 10 月,我们在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Web of Science 和 Scopus 数据库中进行了检索,以确定报告了口服胶原蛋白补充剂对膝关节 OA 影响的随机对照试验 (RCT)。采用随机或固定效应模型(取决于研究间的差异性)和通用逆方差法对结果的定量数据进行汇总。采用 Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 工具评估偏倚风险:本系统综述纳入了 11 项研究性试验中 870 名参与者的信息,其中 451 人被分配到胶原蛋白补充剂组,419 人被分配到安慰剂组。荟萃分析表明,补充胶原蛋白可显著改善功能[MD, -6.46 (95% CI -9.52, -3.40);I2=75%;p=0.00001]和疼痛评分[MD, -13.63 (95% CI -20.67, -6.58);I2=88%;p=0.00001]:这项荟萃分析的结果表明,口服胶原蛋白可缓解 OA 症状。我们的研究结果表明,从统计学和临床角度来看,功能和疼痛评分均有显著改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
18.90%
发文量
377
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology is a bi-monthly international peer-reviewed journal which has been covering all clinical, experimental and translational aspects of musculoskeletal, arthritic and connective tissue diseases since 1983.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信