Quality and safety in prehospital airway management - retrospective analysis of 18,000 cases from an air rescue database in Germany.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Ulf Lorenzen, Hartwig Marung, Christine Eimer, Andrea Köser, Stephan Seewald, Marcus Rudolph, Florian Reifferscheid
{"title":"Quality and safety in prehospital airway management - retrospective analysis of 18,000 cases from an air rescue database in Germany.","authors":"Ulf Lorenzen, Hartwig Marung, Christine Eimer, Andrea Köser, Stephan Seewald, Marcus Rudolph, Florian Reifferscheid","doi":"10.1186/s12873-024-01075-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prehospital airway management remains crucial with regard to the quality and safety of emergency medical service (EMS) systems worldwide. In 2007, the benchmark study by Timmermann et al. hit the German EMS community hard by revealing a significant rate of undetected oesophageal intubations leading to an often-fatal outcome. Since then, much attention has been given to guideline development and training. This study evaluated the incidence and special circumstances of tube misplacement as an adverse peri-intubation event from a Helicopter Emergency Medical Services perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of a German helicopter-based EMS database from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2020. All registered patients were included in the primary analysis. The results were analysed using SPSS 27.0.1.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 227,459 emergency medical responses overall, a total of 18,087 (8.0%) involved invasive airway management. In 8141 (45.0%) of these patients, airway management devices were used by ground-based EMS staff, with an intubation rate of 96.6% (n = 7861), and alternative airways were used in 3.2% (n = 285). Overall, the rate of endotracheal intubation success was 94.7%, while adverse events in the form of tube misplacement were present in 5.3%, with a 1.2% rate of undetected oesophageal intubation. Overall tube misplacement and undetected oesophageal intubation occurred more often after intubation was carried out by paramedics (10.4% and 3.6%, respectively). In view of special circumstances, those errors occurred more often in the presence of trauma or cardiopulmonary resuscitation, with rates of 5.6% and 6.4%, respectively. Difficult airways with a Cormack 4 status were present in 2.1% (n = 213) of HEMS patients, accompanied by three or more intubation attempts in 5.2% (n = 11).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prehospital airway management success has improved significantly in recent years. However, adverse peri-intubation events such as undetected oesophageal intubation remain a persistent threat to patient safety.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was registered in the German Register for Clinical Studies (number DRKS00028068).</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":"157"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368010/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-01075-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prehospital airway management remains crucial with regard to the quality and safety of emergency medical service (EMS) systems worldwide. In 2007, the benchmark study by Timmermann et al. hit the German EMS community hard by revealing a significant rate of undetected oesophageal intubations leading to an often-fatal outcome. Since then, much attention has been given to guideline development and training. This study evaluated the incidence and special circumstances of tube misplacement as an adverse peri-intubation event from a Helicopter Emergency Medical Services perspective.

Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of a German helicopter-based EMS database from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2020. All registered patients were included in the primary analysis. The results were analysed using SPSS 27.0.1.0.

Results: Out of 227,459 emergency medical responses overall, a total of 18,087 (8.0%) involved invasive airway management. In 8141 (45.0%) of these patients, airway management devices were used by ground-based EMS staff, with an intubation rate of 96.6% (n = 7861), and alternative airways were used in 3.2% (n = 285). Overall, the rate of endotracheal intubation success was 94.7%, while adverse events in the form of tube misplacement were present in 5.3%, with a 1.2% rate of undetected oesophageal intubation. Overall tube misplacement and undetected oesophageal intubation occurred more often after intubation was carried out by paramedics (10.4% and 3.6%, respectively). In view of special circumstances, those errors occurred more often in the presence of trauma or cardiopulmonary resuscitation, with rates of 5.6% and 6.4%, respectively. Difficult airways with a Cormack 4 status were present in 2.1% (n = 213) of HEMS patients, accompanied by three or more intubation attempts in 5.2% (n = 11).

Conclusions: Prehospital airway management success has improved significantly in recent years. However, adverse peri-intubation events such as undetected oesophageal intubation remain a persistent threat to patient safety.

Trial registration: The study was registered in the German Register for Clinical Studies (number DRKS00028068).

院前气道管理的质量与安全--对德国空中救援数据库中 18,000 个病例的回顾性分析。
背景:院前气道管理对全球急救医疗服务(EMS)系统的质量和安全至关重要。2007 年,Timmermann 等人的基准研究揭示了食道插管未被发现的严重比率,导致了往往是致命的结果,这给德国急救医疗界带来了沉重打击。从那时起,指导方针的制定和培训就备受关注。本研究从直升机紧急医疗服务的角度评估了插管错位作为插管周围不良事件的发生率和特殊情况:这是一项对德国直升机急救医疗服务数据库(2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日)的回顾性分析。所有登记的患者均纳入主要分析。结果使用 SPSS 27.0.1.0 进行分析:在 227,459 次紧急医疗响应中,共有 18,087 次(8.0%)涉及侵入性气道管理。其中 8141 名患者(45.0%)的气道管理设备由地面急救人员使用,插管率为 96.6%(n = 7861),3.2% 的患者(n = 285)使用了替代气道。总体而言,气管插管成功率为 94.7%,而插管错位的不良事件占 5.3%,食道插管未被发现的比例为 1.2%。总体而言,插管错位和食道插管未被发现的情况在由医护人员插管后发生的频率更高(分别为 10.4% 和 3.6%)。鉴于特殊情况,这些错误更多地发生在有外伤或心肺复苏的情况下,发生率分别为 5.6% 和 6.4%。2.1%(213 人)的急救车患者出现了 Cormack 4 状态的困难气道,5.2%(11 人)的患者尝试了三次或三次以上的插管:结论:院前气道管理的成功率近年来有了显著提高。结论:近年来,院前气道管理的成功率已大幅提高,但未被发现的食道插管等不良插管周围事件仍对患者安全构成持续威胁:该研究已在德国临床研究注册中心注册(编号 DRKS00028068)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信