Readmissions in Sepsis Survivors: Discharge Setting Risks.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Priscilla Hartley, Jordan Pelkmans, Catherine Lott, Melinda K Higgins, Xinyue Chen, Alec Reinhardt, Yutong Zhang, Kathryn A Wood
{"title":"Readmissions in Sepsis Survivors: Discharge Setting Risks.","authors":"Priscilla Hartley, Jordan Pelkmans, Catherine Lott, Melinda K Higgins, Xinyue Chen, Alec Reinhardt, Yutong Zhang, Kathryn A Wood","doi":"10.4037/ajcc2024947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis is a complex condition with high morbidity and mortality. Prompt treatment can improve survival, but for survivors the risk of deterioration and readmission remains high. Little is known about the association between discharge setting and readmission among sepsis survivors.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine 30-day hospital readmission rates in adult sepsis survivors by the type of setting to which patients were discharged.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care database was used to identify adult sepsis survivors and evaluate 30-day readmission by discharge setting. A χ2 contingency analysis was used with each factor and presence/absence of readmission. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare readmissions across discharge settings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From our sample (N = 7107; mean age 66.5 years; 46.2% women), 23.6% (n = 1674) were readmitted within 30 days and of those readmitted, 30% were readmitted between 1 and 3 times. Discharge setting (P < .001) and age (P = .02) were significantly associated with readmission, but sex, ethnicity, and insurance type were not. High numbers of readmissions were seen in patients discharged to skilled nursing facilities (29.6%), home health care (26.9%), and home (15.0%). Similar high comorbidity burden and acuteness of illness were seen in patients discharged to these settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sepsis survivors discharged to skilled nursing facilities, home health care, and home are at high risk for 30-day readmission. The rates of readmission from home health care and home settings were alarming. Often patients are discharged to inappropriate settings, placing them at risk for residual sepsis and readmission. Future research should focus on appropriate timing of hospital discharge and transition to the most appropriate discharge setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":7607,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Critical Care","volume":"33 5","pages":"353-363"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2024947","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is a complex condition with high morbidity and mortality. Prompt treatment can improve survival, but for survivors the risk of deterioration and readmission remains high. Little is known about the association between discharge setting and readmission among sepsis survivors.

Objective: To examine 30-day hospital readmission rates in adult sepsis survivors by the type of setting to which patients were discharged.

Methods: The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care database was used to identify adult sepsis survivors and evaluate 30-day readmission by discharge setting. A χ2 contingency analysis was used with each factor and presence/absence of readmission. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare readmissions across discharge settings.

Results: From our sample (N = 7107; mean age 66.5 years; 46.2% women), 23.6% (n = 1674) were readmitted within 30 days and of those readmitted, 30% were readmitted between 1 and 3 times. Discharge setting (P < .001) and age (P = .02) were significantly associated with readmission, but sex, ethnicity, and insurance type were not. High numbers of readmissions were seen in patients discharged to skilled nursing facilities (29.6%), home health care (26.9%), and home (15.0%). Similar high comorbidity burden and acuteness of illness were seen in patients discharged to these settings.

Conclusions: Sepsis survivors discharged to skilled nursing facilities, home health care, and home are at high risk for 30-day readmission. The rates of readmission from home health care and home settings were alarming. Often patients are discharged to inappropriate settings, placing them at risk for residual sepsis and readmission. Future research should focus on appropriate timing of hospital discharge and transition to the most appropriate discharge setting.

败血症幸存者的再入院治疗:出院设置风险。
背景:败血症是一种发病率和死亡率都很高的复杂疾病。及时治疗可提高存活率,但幸存者病情恶化和再次入院的风险仍然很高。人们对败血症幸存者的出院环境与再入院之间的关系知之甚少:根据患者出院的环境类型,研究成人败血症幸存者的 30 天再入院率:方法:使用重症监护医学信息市场数据库识别成人败血症幸存者,并根据出院环境评估 30 天再入院率。采用χ2或然分析法对每个因素和是否存在再入院进行分析。Kruskal-Wallis 检验用于比较不同出院环境下的再入院情况:在我们的样本中(样本数=7107;平均年龄66.5岁;46.2%为女性),23.6%(样本数=1674)的患者在30天内再次入院,在再次入院的患者中,30%的患者再次入院1至3次。出院环境(P < .001)和年龄(P = .02)与再入院显著相关,但性别、种族和保险类型与再入院无关。出院后入住专业护理机构(29.6%)、家庭医疗护理(26.9%)和居家(15.0%)的患者再入院率较高。在这些环境中出院的患者的合并症负担和病情严重程度相似:结论:出院后入住专业护理机构、家庭医疗保健机构和家庭的败血症幸存者30天内再次入院的风险很高。家庭医疗和居家环境的再入院率令人担忧。患者出院后往往被安置在不合适的环境中,使他们面临脓毒症残留和再次入院的风险。未来的研究应重点关注适当的出院时机和过渡到最合适的出院环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The editors of the American Journal of Critical Care (AJCC) invite authors to submit original manuscripts describing investigations, advances, or observations from all specialties related to the care of critically and acutely ill patients. Papers promoting collaborative practice and research are encouraged. Manuscripts will be considered on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere and have been submitted solely to AJCC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信