Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Early Prediction of Pressure Injury Risk.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Jenny Alderden, Jace Johnny, Katie R Brooks, Andrew Wilson, Tracey L Yap, Yunchuan Lucy Zhao, Mark van der Laan, Susan Kennerly
{"title":"Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Early Prediction of Pressure Injury Risk.","authors":"Jenny Alderden, Jace Johnny, Katie R Brooks, Andrew Wilson, Tracey L Yap, Yunchuan Lucy Zhao, Mark van der Laan, Susan Kennerly","doi":"10.4037/ajcc2024856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) have a major impact on patient outcomes in intensive care units (ICUs). Effective prevention relies on early and accurate risk assessment. Traditional risk-assessment tools, such as the Braden Scale, often fail to capture ICU-specific factors, limiting their predictive accuracy. Although artificial intelligence models offer improved accuracy, their \"black box\" nature poses a barrier to clinical adoption.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop an artificial intelligence-based HAPI risk-assessment model enhanced with an explainable artificial intelligence dashboard to improve interpretability at both the global and individual patient levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An explainable artificial intelligence approach was used to analyze ICU patient data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care. Predictor variables were restricted to the first 48 hours after ICU admission. Various machine-learning algorithms were evaluated, culminating in an ensemble \"super learner\" model. The model's performance was quantified using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve through 5-fold cross-validation. An explainer dashboard was developed (using synthetic data for patient privacy), featuring interactive visualizations for in-depth model interpretation at the global and local levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final sample comprised 28 395 patients with a 4.9% incidence of HAPIs. The ensemble super learner model performed well (area under curve = 0.80). The explainer dashboard provided global and patient-level interactive visualizations of model predictions, showing each variable's influence on the risk-assessment outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The model and its dashboard provide clinicians with a transparent, interpretable artificial intelligence-based risk-assessment system for HAPIs that may enable more effective and timely preventive interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7607,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Critical Care","volume":"33 5","pages":"373-381"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2024856","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) have a major impact on patient outcomes in intensive care units (ICUs). Effective prevention relies on early and accurate risk assessment. Traditional risk-assessment tools, such as the Braden Scale, often fail to capture ICU-specific factors, limiting their predictive accuracy. Although artificial intelligence models offer improved accuracy, their "black box" nature poses a barrier to clinical adoption.

Objective: To develop an artificial intelligence-based HAPI risk-assessment model enhanced with an explainable artificial intelligence dashboard to improve interpretability at both the global and individual patient levels.

Methods: An explainable artificial intelligence approach was used to analyze ICU patient data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care. Predictor variables were restricted to the first 48 hours after ICU admission. Various machine-learning algorithms were evaluated, culminating in an ensemble "super learner" model. The model's performance was quantified using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve through 5-fold cross-validation. An explainer dashboard was developed (using synthetic data for patient privacy), featuring interactive visualizations for in-depth model interpretation at the global and local levels.

Results: The final sample comprised 28 395 patients with a 4.9% incidence of HAPIs. The ensemble super learner model performed well (area under curve = 0.80). The explainer dashboard provided global and patient-level interactive visualizations of model predictions, showing each variable's influence on the risk-assessment outcome.

Conclusion: The model and its dashboard provide clinicians with a transparent, interpretable artificial intelligence-based risk-assessment system for HAPIs that may enable more effective and timely preventive interventions.

用于早期预测压伤风险的可解释人工智能。
背景:医院获得性压力损伤(HAPIs)对重症监护病房(ICU)患者的预后有重大影响。有效的预防有赖于早期准确的风险评估。传统的风险评估工具(如布莱登量表)往往无法捕捉到重症监护室的特定因素,从而限制了其预测的准确性。虽然人工智能模型能提高准确性,但其 "黑箱 "性质阻碍了临床应用:目的:开发一种基于人工智能的 HAPI 风险评估模型,并通过可解释的人工智能仪表板来提高整体和个体患者层面的可解释性:方法:采用可解释人工智能方法分析重症监护医疗信息市场中的重症监护病房患者数据。预测变量仅限于ICU入院后的前48小时。对各种机器学习算法进行了评估,最终建立了一个集合 "超级学习者 "模型。通过 5 倍交叉验证,利用接收者操作特征曲线下的面积对模型的性能进行量化。我们还开发了一个解释性仪表板(使用合成数据以保护患者隐私),以交互式可视化为特色,在全局和局部层面对模型进行深入解释:最终样本包括 28 395 名患者,HAPI 发病率为 4.9%。集合超级学习器模型表现良好(曲线下面积 = 0.80)。解释器仪表板提供了模型预测的全局和患者级交互可视化,显示了每个变量对风险评估结果的影响:该模型及其仪表板为临床医生提供了一个透明、可解释的基于人工智能的 HAPIs 风险评估系统,可实现更有效、更及时的预防干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The editors of the American Journal of Critical Care (AJCC) invite authors to submit original manuscripts describing investigations, advances, or observations from all specialties related to the care of critically and acutely ill patients. Papers promoting collaborative practice and research are encouraged. Manuscripts will be considered on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere and have been submitted solely to AJCC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信