The Implications of a "Flat" Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Curve in Pregnancy.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Miriam Lopian, Ella Segal, Ran Neiger, Ariel Many, Lior Kashani Ligumsky
{"title":"The Implications of a \"Flat\" Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Curve in Pregnancy.","authors":"Miriam Lopian, Ella Segal, Ran Neiger, Ariel Many, Lior Kashani Ligumsky","doi":"10.1055/a-2405-1909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> This study aimed to determine whether pregnant women who have \"flat\" oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) curves in pregnancy are at increased risk of maternal or neonatal adverse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> We conducted a retrospective cohort study of the perinatal outcomes of pregnant women whose 100-g OGTT curve was \"flat,\" defined by a fasting serum glucose level below 95 mg/dL and the remaining values below 100 mg/dL. We compared their perinatal outcomes to women whose OGTT curve was \"normal.\" The primary outcomes compared were the prevalence of macrosomic and small for gestational age (SGA) neonates. Secondary outcomes included hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), prelabor anemia, thrombocytopenia, intrauterine fetal demise, placental abruption, indicated induction of labor, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, mode of delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, blood product transfusion, postpartum readmission, neonatal gender, gestational age at delivery, preterm birth, birth weight, low birth weight, umbilical artery pH < 7.1, Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes, neonatal intensive care unit admission, neonatal respiratory and infectious morbidity, and hypoglycemia. Composite adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> There were 1,060 patients in the study group and 10,591 patients in the control group. Patients with a flat OGTT were younger (28.3 vs. 29.8, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and less likely to be over 35 years old (14.1 vs. 23.4%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). They had a reduced risk of delivering a macrosomic neonate (11.4 vs. 15.1%, OR = 0.7 [0.58-0.89], <i>p</i> = 0.001) and having an unplanned cesarean delivery (7.5 vs. 10.2%, OR = 0.8 [0.58-0.96], <i>p</i> = 0.002). There was no difference in the rate of composite adverse maternal (14.0 vs. 15.4%, OR = 0.9 [0.7-1.0], <i>p</i> = 0.1) or neonatal outcome (5.3 vs. 4.5%, OR = 1.2 [0.9-1.5], <i>p</i> = 0.15). Neonates had a slightly lower mean birth weight (3,474 vs. 3,505 g, <i>p</i> = 0.04) but the rate of SGA was similar in the two groups (2.5 vs. 1.8%, OR = 1.3 [0.9-2.0], <i>p</i> = 0.08).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Pregnant women whose OGTT curve is flat have a lower risk of delivering macrosomic neonates and undergoing unplanned cesarean delivery and are not at increased risk of adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes. More research is required to evaluate the relationship between different OGTT curves and the fetal growth rate.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Patients with a \"flat\" OGTT have a reduced risk of macrosomia.. · Patients with a \"flat\" OGTT have a reduced risk of cesarean delivery.. · Patients with a \"flat\" OGTT are not at increased risk of growth restriction..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2405-1909","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective:  This study aimed to determine whether pregnant women who have "flat" oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) curves in pregnancy are at increased risk of maternal or neonatal adverse outcomes.

Study design:  We conducted a retrospective cohort study of the perinatal outcomes of pregnant women whose 100-g OGTT curve was "flat," defined by a fasting serum glucose level below 95 mg/dL and the remaining values below 100 mg/dL. We compared their perinatal outcomes to women whose OGTT curve was "normal." The primary outcomes compared were the prevalence of macrosomic and small for gestational age (SGA) neonates. Secondary outcomes included hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), prelabor anemia, thrombocytopenia, intrauterine fetal demise, placental abruption, indicated induction of labor, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, mode of delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, blood product transfusion, postpartum readmission, neonatal gender, gestational age at delivery, preterm birth, birth weight, low birth weight, umbilical artery pH < 7.1, Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes, neonatal intensive care unit admission, neonatal respiratory and infectious morbidity, and hypoglycemia. Composite adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes were also evaluated.

Results:  There were 1,060 patients in the study group and 10,591 patients in the control group. Patients with a flat OGTT were younger (28.3 vs. 29.8, p < 0.001) and less likely to be over 35 years old (14.1 vs. 23.4%, p < 0.001). They had a reduced risk of delivering a macrosomic neonate (11.4 vs. 15.1%, OR = 0.7 [0.58-0.89], p = 0.001) and having an unplanned cesarean delivery (7.5 vs. 10.2%, OR = 0.8 [0.58-0.96], p = 0.002). There was no difference in the rate of composite adverse maternal (14.0 vs. 15.4%, OR = 0.9 [0.7-1.0], p = 0.1) or neonatal outcome (5.3 vs. 4.5%, OR = 1.2 [0.9-1.5], p = 0.15). Neonates had a slightly lower mean birth weight (3,474 vs. 3,505 g, p = 0.04) but the rate of SGA was similar in the two groups (2.5 vs. 1.8%, OR = 1.3 [0.9-2.0], p = 0.08).

Conclusion:  Pregnant women whose OGTT curve is flat have a lower risk of delivering macrosomic neonates and undergoing unplanned cesarean delivery and are not at increased risk of adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes. More research is required to evaluate the relationship between different OGTT curves and the fetal growth rate.

Key points: · Patients with a "flat" OGTT have a reduced risk of macrosomia.. · Patients with a "flat" OGTT have a reduced risk of cesarean delivery.. · Patients with a "flat" OGTT are not at increased risk of growth restriction..

妊娠期口服葡萄糖耐量试验曲线 "平坦 "的影响。
目的确定口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)曲线 "平坦 "的孕妇是否会增加围产期不良结局的风险:我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,比较了 100g OGTT 曲线 "平坦"(空腹血清葡萄糖低于 95 mg/dl,其余值低于 100 mg/dl)孕妇与 OGTT 曲线 "正常 "孕妇的围产期结局。比较的主要结果是巨大儿和小于胎龄(SGA)新生儿的患病率。次要结果包括妊娠高血压疾病(HDP)、胎儿宫内夭折、胎盘早剥、引产、胎粪染色羊水(MSAF)、分娩方式、产后出血(PPH)、输血、产后再入院、脐动脉 pH 结果:研究组有 1,060 名患者,对照组有 10,591 名患者。OGTT平坦的患者分娩巨大儿的风险降低(11.4% vs. 15.1% OR 0.7 [0.58-0.89] p=0.001),意外剖宫产的风险降低(7.5% vs. 10.2% OR 0.8 [0.58-0.96] p=0.002)。产妇(14.0% vs 15.4% OR 0.9 [0.7-1.0] p=0.1)和新生儿(5.3% vs 4.5% OR 1.2 [0.9-1.5] p=0.15)的综合不良结局率没有差异。新生儿的平均出生体重略低(3474 克 vs. 3505 克,p=0.04),但两组的 SGA 发生率相似(2.5% vs. 1.8% OR 1.3[0.9-2.0] p=0.08)。结论 OGTT 曲线平坦的孕妇娩出巨大儿和接受意外剖宫产的风险较低,而且不会增加孕产妇或新生儿不良结局的风险。需要进行更多的研究来评估不同 OGTT 曲线与新生儿死亡率之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信