Assessing the accuracy of a wireless sensor system for estimating lumbar moments during manual lifting tasks considering the effects of load weight, asymmetry, and height

IF 2.5 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Iván Nail-Ulloa , Rong Huangfu , Michael Zabala , Dania Bani Hani , Nathan Pool , Howard Chen , Mark C. Schall Jr. , Richard Sesek , Sean Gallagher
{"title":"Assessing the accuracy of a wireless sensor system for estimating lumbar moments during manual lifting tasks considering the effects of load weight, asymmetry, and height","authors":"Iván Nail-Ulloa ,&nbsp;Rong Huangfu ,&nbsp;Michael Zabala ,&nbsp;Dania Bani Hani ,&nbsp;Nathan Pool ,&nbsp;Howard Chen ,&nbsp;Mark C. Schall Jr. ,&nbsp;Richard Sesek ,&nbsp;Sean Gallagher","doi":"10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study assessed the accuracy of L5/S1 moment estimates calculated with an Inertial Motion Capture (IMC) system during an asymmetrical and variable height lifting task. The effects of load weight, asymmetry, and lifting height on estimates of lumbar moment have not been comprehensively considered in studies using IMC systems. Thirty-six participants engaged in tasks involving three loads, lifting heights, and trunk rotation angles. Lumbar moments were calculated using bottom-up and top-down biomechanical models. Gold-standard Optical Motion Capture (OMC) and Force Plates (FP) were used as the reference. A randomized block partially confounded design was used to compare the root mean square errors (RMSE) between the IMC and OMC-based reference estimates. The IMC system's estimated peak moments were 12%–13% lower than those estimated using the gold standard OMC-BU inverse dynamics, while the RMSE varied between 19 and 21 Nm. A Load*Height interaction was found; a trend was identified where the RMSE values increased as both the load and height levels increased. The angle did not show a significant effect on any of the tested scenarios. A close correspondence between the IMC and OMC-based moment estimates was established, with the load being the main factor affecting the differences between systems. The IMC system shows potential for use in occupational settings to capture data on the lumbar moments of workers, which could be utilized to assess ergonomic risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50317,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814124000921","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assessed the accuracy of L5/S1 moment estimates calculated with an Inertial Motion Capture (IMC) system during an asymmetrical and variable height lifting task. The effects of load weight, asymmetry, and lifting height on estimates of lumbar moment have not been comprehensively considered in studies using IMC systems. Thirty-six participants engaged in tasks involving three loads, lifting heights, and trunk rotation angles. Lumbar moments were calculated using bottom-up and top-down biomechanical models. Gold-standard Optical Motion Capture (OMC) and Force Plates (FP) were used as the reference. A randomized block partially confounded design was used to compare the root mean square errors (RMSE) between the IMC and OMC-based reference estimates. The IMC system's estimated peak moments were 12%–13% lower than those estimated using the gold standard OMC-BU inverse dynamics, while the RMSE varied between 19 and 21 Nm. A Load*Height interaction was found; a trend was identified where the RMSE values increased as both the load and height levels increased. The angle did not show a significant effect on any of the tested scenarios. A close correspondence between the IMC and OMC-based moment estimates was established, with the load being the main factor affecting the differences between systems. The IMC system shows potential for use in occupational settings to capture data on the lumbar moments of workers, which could be utilized to assess ergonomic risk.

考虑到负载重量、不对称和身高的影响,评估用于估算人工搬运过程中腰部力矩的无线传感器系统的准确性
本研究评估了惯性运动捕捉(IMC)系统在不对称和不同高度的举重任务中计算出的 L5/S1 扭矩估计值的准确性。在使用 IMC 系统进行的研究中,尚未全面考虑载荷重量、不对称和提升高度对腰部力矩估计值的影响。36 名参与者参与了涉及三种载荷、提升高度和躯干旋转角度的任务。使用自下而上和自上而下的生物力学模型计算腰部力矩。黄金标准的光学运动捕捉(OMC)和力板(FP)被用作参考。采用随机区组部分混杂设计来比较 IMC 和基于 OMC 的参考估计值之间的均方根误差 (RMSE)。IMC 系统估算的峰值力矩比使用黄金标准 OMC-BU 反动力学估算的峰值力矩低 12%-13%,而均方根误差在 19 到 21 牛米之间。载荷*高度之间存在交互作用;随着载荷和高度的增加,均方根误差值也呈上升趋势。角度对任何测试方案都没有明显影响。基于 IMC 和 OMC 的力矩估计值之间建立了密切的对应关系,载荷是影响系统间差异的主要因素。IMC 系统显示了在职业环境中使用的潜力,可用于获取工人腰部力矩的数据,从而评估人体工程学风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
110
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions that add to our understanding of the role of humans in today systems and the interactions thereof with various system components. The journal typically covers the following areas: industrial and occupational ergonomics, design of systems, tools and equipment, human performance measurement and modeling, human productivity, humans in technologically complex systems, and safety. The focus of the articles includes basic theoretical advances, applications, case studies, new methodologies and procedures; and empirical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信