Assessing the accuracy of a wireless sensor system for estimating lumbar moments during manual lifting tasks considering the effects of load weight, asymmetry, and height
Iván Nail-Ulloa , Rong Huangfu , Michael Zabala , Dania Bani Hani , Nathan Pool , Howard Chen , Mark C. Schall Jr. , Richard Sesek , Sean Gallagher
{"title":"Assessing the accuracy of a wireless sensor system for estimating lumbar moments during manual lifting tasks considering the effects of load weight, asymmetry, and height","authors":"Iván Nail-Ulloa , Rong Huangfu , Michael Zabala , Dania Bani Hani , Nathan Pool , Howard Chen , Mark C. Schall Jr. , Richard Sesek , Sean Gallagher","doi":"10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study assessed the accuracy of L5/S1 moment estimates calculated with an Inertial Motion Capture (IMC) system during an asymmetrical and variable height lifting task. The effects of load weight, asymmetry, and lifting height on estimates of lumbar moment have not been comprehensively considered in studies using IMC systems. Thirty-six participants engaged in tasks involving three loads, lifting heights, and trunk rotation angles. Lumbar moments were calculated using bottom-up and top-down biomechanical models. Gold-standard Optical Motion Capture (OMC) and Force Plates (FP) were used as the reference. A randomized block partially confounded design was used to compare the root mean square errors (RMSE) between the IMC and OMC-based reference estimates. The IMC system's estimated peak moments were 12%–13% lower than those estimated using the gold standard OMC-BU inverse dynamics, while the RMSE varied between 19 and 21 Nm. A Load*Height interaction was found; a trend was identified where the RMSE values increased as both the load and height levels increased. The angle did not show a significant effect on any of the tested scenarios. A close correspondence between the IMC and OMC-based moment estimates was established, with the load being the main factor affecting the differences between systems. The IMC system shows potential for use in occupational settings to capture data on the lumbar moments of workers, which could be utilized to assess ergonomic risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50317,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814124000921","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study assessed the accuracy of L5/S1 moment estimates calculated with an Inertial Motion Capture (IMC) system during an asymmetrical and variable height lifting task. The effects of load weight, asymmetry, and lifting height on estimates of lumbar moment have not been comprehensively considered in studies using IMC systems. Thirty-six participants engaged in tasks involving three loads, lifting heights, and trunk rotation angles. Lumbar moments were calculated using bottom-up and top-down biomechanical models. Gold-standard Optical Motion Capture (OMC) and Force Plates (FP) were used as the reference. A randomized block partially confounded design was used to compare the root mean square errors (RMSE) between the IMC and OMC-based reference estimates. The IMC system's estimated peak moments were 12%–13% lower than those estimated using the gold standard OMC-BU inverse dynamics, while the RMSE varied between 19 and 21 Nm. A Load*Height interaction was found; a trend was identified where the RMSE values increased as both the load and height levels increased. The angle did not show a significant effect on any of the tested scenarios. A close correspondence between the IMC and OMC-based moment estimates was established, with the load being the main factor affecting the differences between systems. The IMC system shows potential for use in occupational settings to capture data on the lumbar moments of workers, which could be utilized to assess ergonomic risk.
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes original contributions that add to our understanding of the role of humans in today systems and the interactions thereof with various system components. The journal typically covers the following areas: industrial and occupational ergonomics, design of systems, tools and equipment, human performance measurement and modeling, human productivity, humans in technologically complex systems, and safety. The focus of the articles includes basic theoretical advances, applications, case studies, new methodologies and procedures; and empirical studies.