Analysis of intra-fractional positioning correction performed by cone beam computed tomography in SBRT treatments

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
P García-Acilu , J. García Ruiz-Zorrilla , O. Hernando , A. Prado , X. Chen-Zhao , A. Montero , J. Martí , D. Zucca , L. Alonso , M.A. De la Casa , E. Sánchez , R. Alonso , C. Rubio , P. Fernández-Letón
{"title":"Analysis of intra-fractional positioning correction performed by cone beam computed tomography in SBRT treatments","authors":"P García-Acilu ,&nbsp;J. García Ruiz-Zorrilla ,&nbsp;O. Hernando ,&nbsp;A. Prado ,&nbsp;X. Chen-Zhao ,&nbsp;A. Montero ,&nbsp;J. Martí ,&nbsp;D. Zucca ,&nbsp;L. Alonso ,&nbsp;M.A. De la Casa ,&nbsp;E. Sánchez ,&nbsp;R. Alonso ,&nbsp;C. Rubio ,&nbsp;P. Fernández-Letón","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study aims to evaluate the positioning correction extracted from Intra-fraction Cone Beam (IF-CBCT) images obtained during Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) treatments, and to assess whether its magnitude justifies its acquisition. In addition, the results obtained in lung, liver, and pancreas SBRTs with two deep inspiration breath-hold systems (DIBH), and for prostate with/without ultrasound (US) monitoring were compared.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>1449 treatments, performed with two linear accelerators (LINACs) were retrospectively analyzed. DIBH were performed either with a spirometry-based device or a surface-guidance system and one LINAC was equipped with US monitoring system for prostate. Significance tests were used to account for differences between units.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><em>G</em>roup systematic error (M) was approximately –0.7 mm for DIBH treatments in superior-inferior (SI) direction with no difference (p &gt; 0.7) between LINACs. Moreover, there was a SI difference of 0.5 mm for prostate treatments (p = 0.008), in favor of the US monitored one. In anterior-posterior (AP) direction, only liver treatments exhibited differences between LINACs, with the spirometer-based system being 0.8 mm inferior (p = 0.003). M&lt;0.4 mm in left–right (LR) direction was found for all locations and LINACs. The spirometer-based system resulted in lower standard deviation of systematic and random errors in most components and locations, with a greater effect observed in liver SBRTs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The corrections made with IF-CBCT during SBRT treatments were not negligible. Both DIBH systems were effective in managing respiratory movements. However, the spirometry-based system was slightly more accurate. In addition, US monitoring of the prostate appeared to be useful in reducing target shift.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179724002473","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to evaluate the positioning correction extracted from Intra-fraction Cone Beam (IF-CBCT) images obtained during Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) treatments, and to assess whether its magnitude justifies its acquisition. In addition, the results obtained in lung, liver, and pancreas SBRTs with two deep inspiration breath-hold systems (DIBH), and for prostate with/without ultrasound (US) monitoring were compared.

Methods

1449 treatments, performed with two linear accelerators (LINACs) were retrospectively analyzed. DIBH were performed either with a spirometry-based device or a surface-guidance system and one LINAC was equipped with US monitoring system for prostate. Significance tests were used to account for differences between units.

Results

Group systematic error (M) was approximately –0.7 mm for DIBH treatments in superior-inferior (SI) direction with no difference (p > 0.7) between LINACs. Moreover, there was a SI difference of 0.5 mm for prostate treatments (p = 0.008), in favor of the US monitored one. In anterior-posterior (AP) direction, only liver treatments exhibited differences between LINACs, with the spirometer-based system being 0.8 mm inferior (p = 0.003). M<0.4 mm in left–right (LR) direction was found for all locations and LINACs. The spirometer-based system resulted in lower standard deviation of systematic and random errors in most components and locations, with a greater effect observed in liver SBRTs.

Conclusions

The corrections made with IF-CBCT during SBRT treatments were not negligible. Both DIBH systems were effective in managing respiratory movements. However, the spirometry-based system was slightly more accurate. In addition, US monitoring of the prostate appeared to be useful in reducing target shift.

锥形束计算机断层扫描在 SBRT 治疗中进行的点内定位校正分析
目的 本研究旨在评估从立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)过程中获得的椎间盘内锥形束(IF-CBCT)图像中提取的定位校正,并评估其大小是否证明其采集是合理的。此外,还比较了使用两种深吸气屏气系统(DIBH)进行肺、肝和胰腺 SBRT 治疗的结果,以及使用/不使用超声波(US)监测进行前列腺治疗的结果。DIBH使用基于肺活量的设备或表面引导系统进行,其中一台LINAC配备了前列腺US监测系统。结果在上-下(SI)方向上,DIBH治疗的组系统误差(M)约为-0.7毫米,LINAC之间无差异(p >0.7)。此外,前列腺治疗的 SI 差异为 0.5 毫米(p = 0.008),而 US 监测的前列腺治疗的 SI 差异更大。在前后(AP)方向上,只有肝脏治疗显示出 LINAC 之间的差异,基于肺活量计的系统差 0.8 毫米(p = 0.003)。所有位置和 LINAC 在左右(LR)方向的误差均为 0.4 毫米。基于肺活量计的系统使大多数组件和位置的系统误差和随机误差的标准偏差更低,在肝脏 SBRT 中观察到的效果更大。两种 DIBH 系统都能有效控制呼吸运动。不过,基于肺活量测定的系统要稍微准确一些。此外,对前列腺的 US 监测似乎有助于减少目标偏移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信