Feasibility of the analytical dose calculation method for Au-198 brachytherapy

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
{"title":"Feasibility of the analytical dose calculation method for Au-198 brachytherapy","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>A dose calculation algorithm Computed Tomography (CT)-based analytical dose calculation method (CT<sub>anly</sub>), which can correct for subject inhomogeneity and size-dependent scatter doses, was applied to the <sup>198</sup>Au seed. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of the CT<sub>anly</sub> method by comparing the gold standard Monte Carlo (MC) method and the conventional TG43 method on two virtual phantoms and patient CT images simulating oral cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>As virtual phantoms, a water phantom and a heterogeneous phantom with soft tissue inserted cubic fat, lung, and bone were used. A 2-mm-thick lead plate was also inserted into the heterogeneous phantom as a dose attenuator. Virtual <sup>198</sup>Au seeds and a 2-mm-thick lead plate were placed on the patient CT images. Dose distributions obtained via the TG43 and CT<sub>anly</sub> methods were compared with those of the MC by gamma analysis with 2%/2-mm thresholds. The computation durations were also compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the water phantom, dose distributions comparable to those obtained via the MC method were obtained regardless of the algorithm. For the inhomogeneity phantom and patient case, the CT<sub>anly</sub> method showed an improvement in the gamma passing rate and dose distributions similar to those of the MC method were obtained. The computation time, which was days with the MC method, was reduced to minutes with the CT<sub>anly</sub> method.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The CT<sub>anly</sub> method is effective for <sup>198</sup>Au seed dose calculations and takes a shorter time to obtain the dose distributions than the MC method.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179724002461/pdfft?md5=1085468ddc0be672af09430479818c3a&pid=1-s2.0-S1120179724002461-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179724002461","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

A dose calculation algorithm Computed Tomography (CT)-based analytical dose calculation method (CTanly), which can correct for subject inhomogeneity and size-dependent scatter doses, was applied to the 198Au seed. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of the CTanly method by comparing the gold standard Monte Carlo (MC) method and the conventional TG43 method on two virtual phantoms and patient CT images simulating oral cancer.

Methods

As virtual phantoms, a water phantom and a heterogeneous phantom with soft tissue inserted cubic fat, lung, and bone were used. A 2-mm-thick lead plate was also inserted into the heterogeneous phantom as a dose attenuator. Virtual 198Au seeds and a 2-mm-thick lead plate were placed on the patient CT images. Dose distributions obtained via the TG43 and CTanly methods were compared with those of the MC by gamma analysis with 2%/2-mm thresholds. The computation durations were also compared.

Results

In the water phantom, dose distributions comparable to those obtained via the MC method were obtained regardless of the algorithm. For the inhomogeneity phantom and patient case, the CTanly method showed an improvement in the gamma passing rate and dose distributions similar to those of the MC method were obtained. The computation time, which was days with the MC method, was reduced to minutes with the CTanly method.

Conclusions

The CTanly method is effective for 198Au seed dose calculations and takes a shorter time to obtain the dose distributions than the MC method.

金-198 近距离放射治疗剂量分析计算方法的可行性
目的 一种剂量计算算法 基于计算机断层扫描(CT)的分析剂量计算方法(CTanly)被应用于 198Au 种子,该方法可以校正受试者的不均匀性和与尺寸相关的散射剂量。在这项研究中,我们在两个虚拟模型和模拟口腔癌的患者 CT 图像上比较了金标准蒙特卡罗(MC)方法和传统的 TG43 方法,评估了 CTanly 方法的有效性。异质模型中还插入了一块 2 毫米厚的铅板作为剂量衰减器。在患者 CT 图像上放置了虚拟 198Au 种子和 2 毫米厚的铅板。在 2%/2 毫米阈值下,通过伽马分析将 TG43 和 CTanly 方法获得的剂量分布与 MC 方法的剂量分布进行了比较。结果在水模型中,无论采用哪种算法,都能获得与 MC 方法相当的剂量分布。对于不均匀模型和患者病例,CTanly 方法提高了伽马通过率,得到的剂量分布与 MC 方法相似。结论 CTanly 方法对 198Au 种子剂量计算很有效,与 MC 方法相比,它能在更短的时间内获得剂量分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
493
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics: Medical Imaging Radiation Therapy Radiation Protection Measuring Systems and Signal Processing Education and training in Medical Physics Professional issues in Medical Physics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信