Effects of mobility, immunity and vaccination on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the Dominican Republic: a modelling study

IF 7 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
{"title":"Effects of mobility, immunity and vaccination on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the Dominican Republic: a modelling study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2024.100860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>COVID-19 dynamics are driven by a complex interplay of factors including population behaviour, new variants, vaccination and immunity from prior infections. We quantify drivers of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the Dominican Republic, an upper-middle income country of 10.8 million people. We then assess the impact of the vaccination campaign implemented in February 2021, primarily using CoronaVac, in saving lives and averting hospitalisations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We fit an age-structured, multi-variant transmission dynamic model to reported deaths, hospital bed occupancy, and seroprevalence data until December 2021, and simulate epidemic trajectories under different counterfactual scenarios.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>We estimate that vaccination averted 7210 hospital admissions (95% credible interval, CrI: 6830–7600), 2180 intensive care unit admissions (95% CrI: 2080–2280) and 766 deaths (95% CrI: 694–859) in the first 6 months of the campaign. If no vaccination had occurred, we estimate that an additional decrease of 10–20% in population mobility would have been required to maintain equivalent death and hospitalisation outcomes. We also found that early vaccination with CoronaVac was preferable to delayed vaccination using a product with higher efficacy.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>SARS-CoV-2 transmission dynamics in the Dominican Republic were driven by a substantial accumulation of immunity during the first two years of the pandemic but, despite this, vaccination was essential in enabling a return to pre-pandemic mobility levels without considerable additional morbidity and mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p><span>Medical Research Council</span>, <span>Wellcome Trust</span>, <span>Royal Society</span>, <span>US CDC</span> and Australian <span>National Health and Medical Research Council</span>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667193X2400187X/pdfft?md5=97443b4e7e5bd7d4ce03d546e8419abe&pid=1-s2.0-S2667193X2400187X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667193X2400187X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

COVID-19 dynamics are driven by a complex interplay of factors including population behaviour, new variants, vaccination and immunity from prior infections. We quantify drivers of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the Dominican Republic, an upper-middle income country of 10.8 million people. We then assess the impact of the vaccination campaign implemented in February 2021, primarily using CoronaVac, in saving lives and averting hospitalisations.

Methods

We fit an age-structured, multi-variant transmission dynamic model to reported deaths, hospital bed occupancy, and seroprevalence data until December 2021, and simulate epidemic trajectories under different counterfactual scenarios.

Findings

We estimate that vaccination averted 7210 hospital admissions (95% credible interval, CrI: 6830–7600), 2180 intensive care unit admissions (95% CrI: 2080–2280) and 766 deaths (95% CrI: 694–859) in the first 6 months of the campaign. If no vaccination had occurred, we estimate that an additional decrease of 10–20% in population mobility would have been required to maintain equivalent death and hospitalisation outcomes. We also found that early vaccination with CoronaVac was preferable to delayed vaccination using a product with higher efficacy.

Interpretation

SARS-CoV-2 transmission dynamics in the Dominican Republic were driven by a substantial accumulation of immunity during the first two years of the pandemic but, despite this, vaccination was essential in enabling a return to pre-pandemic mobility levels without considerable additional morbidity and mortality.

Funding

Medical Research Council, Wellcome Trust, Royal Society, US CDC and Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

流动性、免疫力和疫苗接种对多米尼加共和国 SARS-CoV-2 传播的影响:模拟研究
背景CoVID-19 的动态受多种因素的复杂影响,包括人口行为、新变种、疫苗接种和先前感染产生的免疫力。多米尼加共和国是一个拥有 1080 万人口的中高收入国家,我们对该国 SARS-CoV-2 传播的驱动因素进行了量化。然后,我们评估了 2021 年 2 月实施的疫苗接种活动(主要使用 CoronaVac)在挽救生命和避免住院治疗方面的影响。方法我们将 2021 年 12 月之前报告的死亡人数、医院病床占用率和血清流行率数据与年龄结构、多变体传播动态模型相匹配,并模拟了不同反事实情景下的流行轨迹。研究结果我们估计,在疫苗接种活动的前 6 个月,共避免了 7210 例入院(95% 可信区间:6830-7600)、2180 例入住重症监护室(95% 可信区间:2080-2280)和 766 例死亡(95% 可信区间:694-859)。如果不接种疫苗,我们估计人口流动性需要额外降低 10-20% 才能维持同等的死亡和住院结果。我们还发现,早期接种 CoronaVac 优于延迟接种疗效更高的产品。解释SARS-CoV-2 在多米尼加共和国的传播动态是由大流行头两年中免疫力的大量积累所驱动的,但尽管如此,接种疫苗对恢复大流行前的人口流动水平至关重要,而且不会增加大量的发病率和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Lancet Regional Health – Americas, an open-access journal, contributes to The Lancet's global initiative by focusing on health-care quality and access in the Americas. It aims to advance clinical practice and health policy in the region, promoting better health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research advocating change or shedding light on clinical practice and health policy. It welcomes submissions on various regional health topics, including infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, child and adolescent health, maternal and reproductive health, emergency care, health policy, and health equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信