Challenges Meeting 21st Century Cures Act Patient Identity Interoperability and Information Blocking Rules.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
George A Gellert, Mark E Erwich, Sara Krivicky Herdman
{"title":"Challenges Meeting 21st Century Cures Act Patient Identity Interoperability and Information Blocking Rules.","authors":"George A Gellert, Mark E Erwich, Sara Krivicky Herdman","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Gather insights into healthcare organization (HCO) preparedness for new 21st Century Cures Act information blocking disincentives and challenges in achieving greater accuracy /interoperability of patient identity/data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Survey of 197 U.S. healthcare executives (54.7% response rate), included 46 health systems (23.4%), 141 hospitals (71.6%), and 10 payer organizations (5.1%), evaluated organizational gaps in patient identity data management/interoperability and preparation for information deblocking.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Healthcare organizations are unprepared to meet information deblocking requirements and manage increased data influx/exchange. Although 61% have invested in meeting requirements, only 36% have capabilities in place. Majorities reported inability to comply with information blocking rules (59%), communicate electronic patient activity notifications to other organizations (56%), or share/receive patient-level information with patients and other HCOs (57%). Across 12 critical functionalities, 57% lacked key capabilities; 97% reported inadequate patient data/identity management/interoperability as data volume expands, adversely affecting care quality/safety and outcomes; and 57% envision patient data-matching errors precipitating a healthcare crisis in 5-10 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many HCOs are unprepared to meet new Cures Act information blocking requirements and resultant increase of internal/external patient data volumes. Next generation master data management, enterprise master patient index, and referential matching technologies can improve HCO patient identity and data management, and information interoperability.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":"46 5","pages":"306-315"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000446","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Gather insights into healthcare organization (HCO) preparedness for new 21st Century Cures Act information blocking disincentives and challenges in achieving greater accuracy /interoperability of patient identity/data.

Methods: Survey of 197 U.S. healthcare executives (54.7% response rate), included 46 health systems (23.4%), 141 hospitals (71.6%), and 10 payer organizations (5.1%), evaluated organizational gaps in patient identity data management/interoperability and preparation for information deblocking.

Results: Healthcare organizations are unprepared to meet information deblocking requirements and manage increased data influx/exchange. Although 61% have invested in meeting requirements, only 36% have capabilities in place. Majorities reported inability to comply with information blocking rules (59%), communicate electronic patient activity notifications to other organizations (56%), or share/receive patient-level information with patients and other HCOs (57%). Across 12 critical functionalities, 57% lacked key capabilities; 97% reported inadequate patient data/identity management/interoperability as data volume expands, adversely affecting care quality/safety and outcomes; and 57% envision patient data-matching errors precipitating a healthcare crisis in 5-10 years.

Conclusions: Many HCOs are unprepared to meet new Cures Act information blocking requirements and resultant increase of internal/external patient data volumes. Next generation master data management, enterprise master patient index, and referential matching technologies can improve HCO patient identity and data management, and information interoperability.

满足《21 世纪治愈法案》患者身份互操作性和信息屏蔽规则的挑战。
目标深入了解医疗机构(HCO)对新的《21 世纪治愈法案》信息封锁的准备情况,以及在提高患者身份/数据的准确性/互操作性方面遇到的阻碍和挑战:对 197 名美国医疗机构高管(回复率为 54.7%)进行了调查,其中包括 46 家医疗系统(23.4%)、141 家医院(71.6%)和 10 家支付机构(5.1%),评估了机构在患者身份数据管理/互操作性方面的差距以及为信息封锁所做的准备:结果:医疗机构在满足信息解锁要求和管理日益增多的数据流入/交换方面准备不足。虽然 61% 的医疗机构已为满足要求进行了投资,但只有 36% 的医疗机构具备相应的能力。大多数医疗机构表示无法遵守信息封锁规则(59%),无法向其他机构传达电子患者活动通知(56%),也无法与患者和其他医疗保健机构共享/接收患者级别的信息(57%)。在 12 项关键功能中,57% 缺乏关键功能;97% 报告称,随着数据量的增加,患者数据/身份管理/互操作性不足,对医疗质量/安全和结果产生不利影响;57% 预计患者数据匹配错误将在 5-10 年内引发医疗危机:结论:许多医疗保健公司没有做好准备,无法满足新的《治愈法案》信息封锁要求以及随之增加的内部/外部患者数据量。下一代主数据管理、企业主病人索引和参照匹配技术可以改善 HCO 病人身份和数据管理以及信息互操作性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal for Healthcare Quality
Journal for Healthcare Quality HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®. The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as: Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信