George A Gellert, Mark E Erwich, Sara Krivicky Herdman
{"title":"Challenges Meeting 21st Century Cures Act Patient Identity Interoperability and Information Blocking Rules.","authors":"George A Gellert, Mark E Erwich, Sara Krivicky Herdman","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Gather insights into healthcare organization (HCO) preparedness for new 21st Century Cures Act information blocking disincentives and challenges in achieving greater accuracy /interoperability of patient identity/data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Survey of 197 U.S. healthcare executives (54.7% response rate), included 46 health systems (23.4%), 141 hospitals (71.6%), and 10 payer organizations (5.1%), evaluated organizational gaps in patient identity data management/interoperability and preparation for information deblocking.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Healthcare organizations are unprepared to meet information deblocking requirements and manage increased data influx/exchange. Although 61% have invested in meeting requirements, only 36% have capabilities in place. Majorities reported inability to comply with information blocking rules (59%), communicate electronic patient activity notifications to other organizations (56%), or share/receive patient-level information with patients and other HCOs (57%). Across 12 critical functionalities, 57% lacked key capabilities; 97% reported inadequate patient data/identity management/interoperability as data volume expands, adversely affecting care quality/safety and outcomes; and 57% envision patient data-matching errors precipitating a healthcare crisis in 5-10 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many HCOs are unprepared to meet new Cures Act information blocking requirements and resultant increase of internal/external patient data volumes. Next generation master data management, enterprise master patient index, and referential matching technologies can improve HCO patient identity and data management, and information interoperability.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":"46 5","pages":"306-315"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000446","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Gather insights into healthcare organization (HCO) preparedness for new 21st Century Cures Act information blocking disincentives and challenges in achieving greater accuracy /interoperability of patient identity/data.
Methods: Survey of 197 U.S. healthcare executives (54.7% response rate), included 46 health systems (23.4%), 141 hospitals (71.6%), and 10 payer organizations (5.1%), evaluated organizational gaps in patient identity data management/interoperability and preparation for information deblocking.
Results: Healthcare organizations are unprepared to meet information deblocking requirements and manage increased data influx/exchange. Although 61% have invested in meeting requirements, only 36% have capabilities in place. Majorities reported inability to comply with information blocking rules (59%), communicate electronic patient activity notifications to other organizations (56%), or share/receive patient-level information with patients and other HCOs (57%). Across 12 critical functionalities, 57% lacked key capabilities; 97% reported inadequate patient data/identity management/interoperability as data volume expands, adversely affecting care quality/safety and outcomes; and 57% envision patient data-matching errors precipitating a healthcare crisis in 5-10 years.
Conclusions: Many HCOs are unprepared to meet new Cures Act information blocking requirements and resultant increase of internal/external patient data volumes. Next generation master data management, enterprise master patient index, and referential matching technologies can improve HCO patient identity and data management, and information interoperability.
期刊介绍:
The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®.
The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as:
Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform