Differences in fluidity and viscosity of brand-name and generic injectable ointment.

IF 1.9 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Drug Discoveries and Therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-09-19 Epub Date: 2024-08-29 DOI:10.5582/ddt.2024.01051
Atsushi Ishimura, Chiaki Ogawa, Megumi Yatabe, Kentaro Tani, Motoki Inoue
{"title":"Differences in fluidity and viscosity of brand-name and generic injectable ointment.","authors":"Atsushi Ishimura, Chiaki Ogawa, Megumi Yatabe, Kentaro Tani, Motoki Inoue","doi":"10.5582/ddt.2024.01051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Generic medications contain the identical active ingredient in the same concentration as their branded counterparts and are administered in the same manner, aiming to deliver comparable efficacy, dosage, and clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, variations in additives and formulation processes, particularly noticeable in topical medications, can influence factors like ease of use and patient adherence. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to compare the rheological attributes of branded and generic injectable ointments, assessing disparities in formulation performance and their impact on patient care. Posterisan<sup>®</sup> Forte and Hemoporison<sup>®</sup> ointments were used as the branded and generic versions, respectively, and their viscosity, ductility, and viscoelastic properties were evaluated. Posterisan<sup>®</sup> Forte showcased enhanced spread ability, maintaining uniform flow characteristics across varying temperatures, whereas Hemoporison<sup>®</sup> displayed pronounced thixotropic properties and stiffness, suggesting potential benefits for applications necessitating reversible viscosity adjustments and heightened rigidity. Despite sharing identical additives, observable differences in physical characteristics highlight the necessity of understanding formulation traits, which could influence ointment behavior. Alterations in fluidity and viscosity may affect how patients perceive and apply the medication, potentially influencing treatment outcomes and the occurrence of adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":47494,"journal":{"name":"Drug Discoveries and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"265-268"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Discoveries and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5582/ddt.2024.01051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Generic medications contain the identical active ingredient in the same concentration as their branded counterparts and are administered in the same manner, aiming to deliver comparable efficacy, dosage, and clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, variations in additives and formulation processes, particularly noticeable in topical medications, can influence factors like ease of use and patient adherence. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to compare the rheological attributes of branded and generic injectable ointments, assessing disparities in formulation performance and their impact on patient care. Posterisan® Forte and Hemoporison® ointments were used as the branded and generic versions, respectively, and their viscosity, ductility, and viscoelastic properties were evaluated. Posterisan® Forte showcased enhanced spread ability, maintaining uniform flow characteristics across varying temperatures, whereas Hemoporison® displayed pronounced thixotropic properties and stiffness, suggesting potential benefits for applications necessitating reversible viscosity adjustments and heightened rigidity. Despite sharing identical additives, observable differences in physical characteristics highlight the necessity of understanding formulation traits, which could influence ointment behavior. Alterations in fluidity and viscosity may affect how patients perceive and apply the medication, potentially influencing treatment outcomes and the occurrence of adverse effects.

品牌和非专利注射软膏的流动性和粘度差异。
非专利药含有与品牌药相同浓度的活性成分,其给药方式也与品牌药相同,旨在提供相似的疗效、剂量和临床结果。然而,添加剂和配制工艺的不同,尤其是外用药物的不同,会影响药物的易用性和患者的依从性等因素。因此,在本研究中,我们旨在比较品牌和非专利注射软膏的流变属性,评估配方性能的差异及其对患者护理的影响。我们分别使用 Posterisan® Forte 软膏和 Hemoporison® 软膏作为品牌软膏和普通软膏,并对它们的粘度、延展性和粘弹性进行了评估。Posterisan® Forte 表现出更强的铺展能力,在不同温度下都能保持均匀的流动特性,而 Hemoporison® 则表现出明显的触变特性和硬度,这表明在需要可逆粘度调整和增强硬度的应用中具有潜在的优势。尽管添加剂相同,但物理特性上的明显差异凸显了了解配方特性的必要性,这些特性可能会影响软膏的性能。流动性和粘度的变化可能会影响患者对药物的感知和应用,从而可能影响治疗效果和不良反应的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug Discoveries and Therapeutics
Drug Discoveries and Therapeutics PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
51
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信