Treasury buybacks, the Federal Reserve’s portfolio, and changes in local supply

IF 3.6 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Michael F. Connolly , Ethan Struby
{"title":"Treasury buybacks, the Federal Reserve’s portfolio, and changes in local supply","authors":"Michael F. Connolly ,&nbsp;Ethan Struby","doi":"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We document spillover effects of the 2000–2002 Treasury Buyback program on Treasury returns and the composition of the Federal Reserve’s System Open Market Account (SOMA) portfolio. The reduction in bond supply due to the buybacks contributed an average of 95 basis points to the yields of bonds bought back and bonds of similar maturity over the course of the program. Each $10 billion of purchases corresponded with an average yield increase of 7.8 basis points. At a higher frequency, prices of purchased and near substitute bonds increased on settlement dates. Changes to the SOMA portfolio were smaller for securities exposed to the buybacks and tended to occur outside of auction weeks, consistent with the Federal Reserve attempting to avoid exacerbating Treasury supply shortages. We relate our findings to the theoretical literature on asset supply in preferred habitats models of the term structure. Our results suggest that the proposed reintroduction of the Treasury buyback program will have limited effects due to its size and proposed composition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Banking & Finance","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 107286"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Banking & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426624002000","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We document spillover effects of the 2000–2002 Treasury Buyback program on Treasury returns and the composition of the Federal Reserve’s System Open Market Account (SOMA) portfolio. The reduction in bond supply due to the buybacks contributed an average of 95 basis points to the yields of bonds bought back and bonds of similar maturity over the course of the program. Each $10 billion of purchases corresponded with an average yield increase of 7.8 basis points. At a higher frequency, prices of purchased and near substitute bonds increased on settlement dates. Changes to the SOMA portfolio were smaller for securities exposed to the buybacks and tended to occur outside of auction weeks, consistent with the Federal Reserve attempting to avoid exacerbating Treasury supply shortages. We relate our findings to the theoretical literature on asset supply in preferred habitats models of the term structure. Our results suggest that the proposed reintroduction of the Treasury buyback program will have limited effects due to its size and proposed composition.

国债回购、美联储的投资组合以及本地供应的变化
我们记录了 2000-2002 年国债回购计划对国债收益率和美联储系统公开市场账户(SOMA)投资组合构成的溢出效应。在计划实施期间,回购导致的债券供应减少平均使回购债券和类似期限债券的收益率提高了 95 个基点。每回购 100 亿美元,收益率平均提高 7.8 个基点。在更高频率上,购买的债券和接近替代债券的价格在结算日均有所上升。对于受回购影响的证券而言,SOMA 投资组合的变化较小,而且往往发生在拍卖周之外,这与美联储试图避免加剧国债供应短缺是一致的。我们将研究结果与期限结构首选生境模型中的资产供应理论文献联系起来。我们的结果表明,由于其规模和拟议的构成,重新引入国债回购计划的建议将产生有限的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.40%
发文量
262
期刊介绍: The Journal of Banking and Finance (JBF) publishes theoretical and empirical research papers spanning all the major research fields in finance and banking. The aim of the Journal of Banking and Finance is to provide an outlet for the increasing flow of scholarly research concerning financial institutions and the money and capital markets within which they function. The Journal''s emphasis is on theoretical developments and their implementation, empirical, applied, and policy-oriented research in banking and other domestic and international financial institutions and markets. The Journal''s purpose is to improve communications between, and within, the academic and other research communities and policymakers and operational decision makers at financial institutions - private and public, national and international, and their regulators. The Journal is one of the largest Finance journals, with approximately 1500 new submissions per year, mainly in the following areas: Asset Management; Asset Pricing; Banking (Efficiency, Regulation, Risk Management, Solvency); Behavioural Finance; Capital Structure; Corporate Finance; Corporate Governance; Derivative Pricing and Hedging; Distribution Forecasting with Financial Applications; Entrepreneurial Finance; Empirical Finance; Financial Economics; Financial Markets (Alternative, Bonds, Currency, Commodity, Derivatives, Equity, Energy, Real Estate); FinTech; Fund Management; General Equilibrium Models; High-Frequency Trading; Intermediation; International Finance; Hedge Funds; Investments; Liquidity; Market Efficiency; Market Microstructure; Mergers and Acquisitions; Networks; Performance Analysis; Political Risk; Portfolio Optimization; Regulation of Financial Markets and Institutions; Risk Management and Analysis; Systemic Risk; Term Structure Models; Venture Capital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信