Barriers to calling emergency services amongst people who use substances in the event of overdose: A scoping review

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Hannah Byles , Navid Sedaghat , Nathan Rider , William Rioux , Alexandra Loverock , Boogyung Seo , Avnit Dhanoa , Taylor Orr , Nicole Dunnewold , Lisa Tjosvold , S․Monty Ghosh
{"title":"Barriers to calling emergency services amongst people who use substances in the event of overdose: A scoping review","authors":"Hannah Byles ,&nbsp;Navid Sedaghat ,&nbsp;Nathan Rider ,&nbsp;William Rioux ,&nbsp;Alexandra Loverock ,&nbsp;Boogyung Seo ,&nbsp;Avnit Dhanoa ,&nbsp;Taylor Orr ,&nbsp;Nicole Dunnewold ,&nbsp;Lisa Tjosvold ,&nbsp;S․Monty Ghosh","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>North America is grappling with an ongoing drug overdose crisis. While harm reduction measures like take-home naloxone kits, and supervised consumption sites, have helped reduce mortality, other strategies to address this public health emergency are required. Good Samaritan Laws (GSLs) offer legal protection for individuals who report overdoses, yet people who use substances (PWUS) may still hesitate to seek help due to concerns about existing legislation. This scoping review explores barriers preventing PWUS from calling emergency services for overdoses, along with potential solutions and facilitators to address this challenge.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>PRISMA-ScR was used as a guide to conduct this study. Health sciences librarians searched Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, CINAHL, and SCOPUS to identify relevant articles. Six reviewers contributed to screening and extracting the articles through Covidence. Two reviewers performed thematic analysis using NVivo software to identify key barriers and facilitators.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>An initial search found 6275 articles for title and abstract screening, resulting in 48 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. The primary barrier to calling 911 pertained to concerns about police arrivng with other first responders, especially regarding their presence and involvement at the scene of overdose. This was followed by legal repercussions, including fear of arrest, incarceration, and fear of eviction, amongst others. Some studies noted the lack of knowledge or trust in GSLs as a deterrent to seeking medical assistance. Additional barriers included concerns about privacy and confidentiality, preference to manage an overdose alone/receive help from another peer, confidence in naloxone effectiveness, limited access to cell phones, peer pressure to not call for help, and identifying as Black, Indigenous, or a Person of Colour (BIPOC). Facilitators include increased GSL awareness among PWUS and law enforcement, expanded legal safeguards for 911 callers, reduced police intervention in overdose cases, and enhanced naloxone availability at key access points.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Despite the good intentions of GSLs, PWUS continue to experience significant barriers to calling emergency services in the event of an overdose. Understanding these barriers and key facilitators is necessary to inform future drug policy and advocacy efforts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 104559"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924002433/pdfft?md5=2f17bd106ec3dbc56909a8eb76aef1bd&pid=1-s2.0-S0955395924002433-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924002433","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

North America is grappling with an ongoing drug overdose crisis. While harm reduction measures like take-home naloxone kits, and supervised consumption sites, have helped reduce mortality, other strategies to address this public health emergency are required. Good Samaritan Laws (GSLs) offer legal protection for individuals who report overdoses, yet people who use substances (PWUS) may still hesitate to seek help due to concerns about existing legislation. This scoping review explores barriers preventing PWUS from calling emergency services for overdoses, along with potential solutions and facilitators to address this challenge.

Methods

PRISMA-ScR was used as a guide to conduct this study. Health sciences librarians searched Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, CINAHL, and SCOPUS to identify relevant articles. Six reviewers contributed to screening and extracting the articles through Covidence. Two reviewers performed thematic analysis using NVivo software to identify key barriers and facilitators.

Results

An initial search found 6275 articles for title and abstract screening, resulting in 48 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. The primary barrier to calling 911 pertained to concerns about police arrivng with other first responders, especially regarding their presence and involvement at the scene of overdose. This was followed by legal repercussions, including fear of arrest, incarceration, and fear of eviction, amongst others. Some studies noted the lack of knowledge or trust in GSLs as a deterrent to seeking medical assistance. Additional barriers included concerns about privacy and confidentiality, preference to manage an overdose alone/receive help from another peer, confidence in naloxone effectiveness, limited access to cell phones, peer pressure to not call for help, and identifying as Black, Indigenous, or a Person of Colour (BIPOC). Facilitators include increased GSL awareness among PWUS and law enforcement, expanded legal safeguards for 911 callers, reduced police intervention in overdose cases, and enhanced naloxone availability at key access points.

Conclusion

Despite the good intentions of GSLs, PWUS continue to experience significant barriers to calling emergency services in the event of an overdose. Understanding these barriers and key facilitators is necessary to inform future drug policy and advocacy efforts.

药物使用者在用药过量时呼叫急救服务的障碍:范围界定审查
背景北美正在努力应对持续的吸毒过量危机。虽然减少伤害的措施(如带回家的纳洛酮包和监督消费场所)有助于降低死亡率,但还需要其他策略来应对这一公共卫生紧急状况。好撒玛利亚人法(Good Samaritan Laws,GSLs)为报告用药过量的个人提供了法律保护,但药物滥用者(PWUS)仍可能会因担心现行法律而不愿寻求帮助。本范围界定综述探讨了阻碍吸毒者因用药过量而拨打急救电话的障碍,以及应对这一挑战的潜在解决方案和促进因素。健康科学图书馆员检索了 Medline、Embase、PsychINFO、CINAHL 和 SCOPUS,以确定相关文章。六位审稿人通过 Covidence 对文章进行了筛选和提取。两名审稿人使用 NVivo 软件进行了专题分析,以确定关键障碍和促进因素。结果初步检索发现了 6275 篇文章,并对标题和摘要进行了筛选,最终有 48 项研究符合纳入标准。拨打 911 的主要障碍是担心警察与其他急救人员一起到达现场,尤其是担心警察在吸毒过量现场的存在和参与。其次是法律方面的影响,包括担心被逮捕、监禁和担心被驱逐等。一些研究指出,缺乏对普通斯里兰卡人的了解或信任是阻碍寻求医疗援助的一个因素。其他障碍包括对隐私和保密性的担忧、倾向于独自处理用药过量问题/接受其他同伴的帮助、对纳洛酮有效性的信心、使用手机的机会有限、不求助的同伴压力以及黑人、土著人或有色人种(BIPOC)的身份认同。促进因素包括提高吸毒者和执法人员对 GSL 的认识、扩大对 911 求助者的法律保障、减少警方对用药过量案件的干预,以及加强关键接入点的纳洛酮供应。了解这些障碍和关键的促进因素对于未来的毒品政策和宣传工作非常必要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信