The empathy project: Staff confidence and training needs in psychosocial patient care

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
{"title":"The empathy project: Staff confidence and training needs in psychosocial patient care","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2024.101735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Radiation Therapists (RT) must balance highly technical procedures and psychosocial patient care during their daily work practices. While RTs are in a unique position to form rapport with patients and provide support and information, many RTs lack confidence in the psychosocial care of patients, and struggle to identify and address emotional cues. This study aimed to assess the confidence, competence, and training needs of RTs regarding psychosocial patient care.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All RTs at the Radiation Oncology Princess Alexandra Hospital Deparmtents were invited to participate in an electronic survey in May 2021, and May 2023 via email. The survey was distributed using SurveyMonkey and utilised a series of Likert-scale and open-ended questions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Staff reported high confidence in addressing technical treatment issues (98 % of respondents) and communicating with anxious (78 %) and distressed (78 %) patients. However, lower confidence was indicated with managing patient conflict (58 %) and communicating with patients who were depressed (53 %) or suffering mental health conditions (74 %). Staff were concerned about saying the wrong thing and experienced stress when they couldn't adequately communicate with patients requiring psychosocial support.</p><p>The most significant barriers to providing adequate psychosocial care included time, staff numbers, and workload. Staff requested training in emotional cues, communication, anxiety and depression, and understanding psychosocial and mental health conditions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>While staff perceptions and motivations of psychosocial care were overwhelmingly positive, further training is required to improve patient psychosocial care. Future steps include implementing psychosocial training resources in the departments, and reassessing staff confidence post training.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939865424004661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Radiation Therapists (RT) must balance highly technical procedures and psychosocial patient care during their daily work practices. While RTs are in a unique position to form rapport with patients and provide support and information, many RTs lack confidence in the psychosocial care of patients, and struggle to identify and address emotional cues. This study aimed to assess the confidence, competence, and training needs of RTs regarding psychosocial patient care.

Methods

All RTs at the Radiation Oncology Princess Alexandra Hospital Deparmtents were invited to participate in an electronic survey in May 2021, and May 2023 via email. The survey was distributed using SurveyMonkey and utilised a series of Likert-scale and open-ended questions.

Results

Staff reported high confidence in addressing technical treatment issues (98 % of respondents) and communicating with anxious (78 %) and distressed (78 %) patients. However, lower confidence was indicated with managing patient conflict (58 %) and communicating with patients who were depressed (53 %) or suffering mental health conditions (74 %). Staff were concerned about saying the wrong thing and experienced stress when they couldn't adequately communicate with patients requiring psychosocial support.

The most significant barriers to providing adequate psychosocial care included time, staff numbers, and workload. Staff requested training in emotional cues, communication, anxiety and depression, and understanding psychosocial and mental health conditions.

Conclusion

While staff perceptions and motivations of psychosocial care were overwhelmingly positive, further training is required to improve patient psychosocial care. Future steps include implementing psychosocial training resources in the departments, and reassessing staff confidence post training.

移情项目:员工在社会心理护理方面的信心和培训需求
导言放射治疗师(RT)必须在日常工作实践中平衡高度技术性的程序和对患者的社会心理护理。虽然放射治疗师在与患者建立融洽关系、提供支持和信息方面具有独特的优势,但许多放射治疗师对患者的社会心理护理缺乏信心,在识别和处理情感暗示方面也很吃力。本研究旨在评估 RTs 在患者社会心理护理方面的信心、能力和培训需求。方法邀请亚历山德拉公主医院放射肿瘤科的所有 RTs 在 2021 年 5 月和 2023 年 5 月通过电子邮件参与电子调查。调查使用 SurveyMonkey 发布,并使用了一系列李克特量表和开放式问题。结果工作人员表示,他们对解决技术治疗问题(98% 的受访者)以及与焦虑(78%)和痛苦(78%)的患者沟通很有信心。然而,在处理病人冲突(58%)和与抑郁(53%)或患有精神疾病的病人沟通(74%)方面,工作人员的信心较低。工作人员担心说错话,并在无法与需要心理支持的病人充分沟通时感到压力。员工要求在情绪暗示、沟通、焦虑和抑郁以及理解社会心理和精神健康状况方面接受培训。结论虽然员工对社会心理护理的看法和动机绝大多数都是积极的,但要改善患者的社会心理护理,还需要进一步的培训。未来的措施包括在科室中实施社会心理培训资源,并在培训后重新评估员工的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
231
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists. This journal is published four times a year and is circulated to approximately 11,000 medical radiation technologists, libraries and radiology departments throughout Canada, the United States and overseas. The Journal publishes articles on recent research, new technology and techniques, professional practices, technologists viewpoints as well as relevant book reviews.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信