Mind the Gap

{"title":"Mind the Gap","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.chstcc.2024.100089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Induction agents are administered to decrease the risk of discomfort, awareness, and psychological sequelae during procedural paralysis (eg, rapid sequence intubation). The expected duration of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents exceeds that of induction sedatives. The resulting sedation gap may increase the risk of awake paralysis.</p></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><p>The objective of this study was to elucidate the prevalence and duration of sedation gaps in critically ill patients undergoing bedside procedural paralysis.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of critically ill adults who received rocuronium for a bedside procedure. The primary outcome was the sedation gap, which was the cumulative time of inadequate sedation during presumed paralysis (ie, 60 min after rocuronium). Secondary outcomes included the sedation gap when a pharmacist was present at the bedside. Descriptive statistics were used for baseline characteristics and the primary outcome. Log-rank and Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> tests were used to analyze secondary outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eighty patients were included in the final analysis. The average age was 60 years and 57% of patients were male. The most common indication for procedural paralysis was rapid sequence intubation (99%). Most procedures were performed in the ED (55%), followed by the ICU (43.8%). Eighty-five percent of patients experienced a sedation gap of any duration. The median sedation gap was 19 min (interquartile range [IQR], 4-47.5 min). The probability of initiating adequate sedation was higher when a pharmacist was present at the bedside (hazard ratio, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.42-1.55], bootstrapping log-rank test). The median sedation gap with a pharmacist (11 min [IQR, 3-27.5 min]) was significantly lower than without a pharmacist (40 min [IQR, 17-55 min]; <em>P</em> = .0115, Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test).</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>In this critically ill cohort, a substantial prevalence and duration of inadequate sedation was experienced after receiving rocuronium for bedside procedures. Further study is needed to identify if sedation gaps correlate with an increased risk of psychological morbidities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93934,"journal":{"name":"CHEST critical care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949788424000431/pdfft?md5=d3ad7f3d4078c5c0f5f838adea87b630&pid=1-s2.0-S2949788424000431-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST critical care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949788424000431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Induction agents are administered to decrease the risk of discomfort, awareness, and psychological sequelae during procedural paralysis (eg, rapid sequence intubation). The expected duration of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents exceeds that of induction sedatives. The resulting sedation gap may increase the risk of awake paralysis.

Research Question

The objective of this study was to elucidate the prevalence and duration of sedation gaps in critically ill patients undergoing bedside procedural paralysis.

Study Design and Methods

This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of critically ill adults who received rocuronium for a bedside procedure. The primary outcome was the sedation gap, which was the cumulative time of inadequate sedation during presumed paralysis (ie, 60 min after rocuronium). Secondary outcomes included the sedation gap when a pharmacist was present at the bedside. Descriptive statistics were used for baseline characteristics and the primary outcome. Log-rank and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to analyze secondary outcomes.

Results

Eighty patients were included in the final analysis. The average age was 60 years and 57% of patients were male. The most common indication for procedural paralysis was rapid sequence intubation (99%). Most procedures were performed in the ED (55%), followed by the ICU (43.8%). Eighty-five percent of patients experienced a sedation gap of any duration. The median sedation gap was 19 min (interquartile range [IQR], 4-47.5 min). The probability of initiating adequate sedation was higher when a pharmacist was present at the bedside (hazard ratio, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.42-1.55], bootstrapping log-rank test). The median sedation gap with a pharmacist (11 min [IQR, 3-27.5 min]) was significantly lower than without a pharmacist (40 min [IQR, 17-55 min]; P = .0115, Mann-Whitney U test).

Interpretation

In this critically ill cohort, a substantial prevalence and duration of inadequate sedation was experienced after receiving rocuronium for bedside procedures. Further study is needed to identify if sedation gaps correlate with an increased risk of psychological morbidities.

注意差距
背景使用诱导剂是为了降低手术瘫痪(如快速顺序插管)过程中出现不适、意识障碍和心理后遗症的风险。非去极化神经肌肉阻滞剂的预期持续时间超过诱导镇静剂。研究设计与方法这是一项回顾性横断面研究,研究对象为接受罗库洛铵治疗的重症成人患者。主要结果是镇静间隙,即假定瘫痪期间(即罗库洛铵作用后 60 分钟)镇静不足的累计时间。次要结果包括药剂师在床旁时的镇静间隙。基线特征和主要结果采用描述性统计。对数秩检验和曼惠尼 U 检验用于分析次要结果。平均年龄为 60 岁,57% 的患者为男性。手术麻痹最常见的适应症是快速顺序插管(99%)。大多数手术在急诊室进行(55%),其次是重症监护室(43.8%)。85%的患者经历过任何时间段的镇静间隙。镇静间隙的中位数为 19 分钟(四分位距 [IQR],4-47.5 分钟)。有药剂师在床旁时,启动充分镇静的概率更高(危险比为 1.49 [95% CI, 1.42-1.55],引导对数秩检验)。有药剂师在场时,镇静间隙的中位数(11 分钟 [IQR, 3-27.5 分钟])明显低于无药剂师在场时(40 分钟 [IQR, 17-55 分钟];P = .0115, Mann-Whitney U 检验)。需要进一步研究以确定镇静不足是否与心理疾病风险增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CHEST critical care
CHEST critical care Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信