Discovery of novel thiazole derivatives containing pyrazole scaffold as PPAR-γ Agonists, α-Glucosidase, α-Amylase and COX-2 inhibitors; Design, synthesis and in silico study

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
{"title":"Discovery of novel thiazole derivatives containing pyrazole scaffold as PPAR-γ Agonists, α-Glucosidase, α-Amylase and COX-2 inhibitors; Design, synthesis and in silico study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bioorg.2024.107760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A novel series of thiazole derivatives with pyrazole scaffold <strong>16a-l</strong> as hybrid rosiglitazone/celecoxib analogs was designed, synthesized and tested for its PPAR-γ activation, α-glucosidase, α-amylase and COX-2 inhibitory activities. Regarding the anti-diabetic activity, all compounds were assessed <em>in vitro</em> against PPAR-γ activation, α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibition in addition to <em>in vivo</em> hypoglycemic activity (one day and 15 days studies). Compounds <strong>16b, 16c, 16e</strong> and <strong>16 k</strong> showed good PPAR-γ activation (activation % ≈ 72–79 %) compared to that of the reference drug rosiglitazone (74 %). In addition, the same derivatives <strong>16b, 16c, 16e</strong> and <strong>16 k</strong> showed the highest inhibitory activities against α-glucosidase (IC<sub>50</sub> = 0.158, 0.314, 0.305, 0.128 μM, respectively) and against α-amylase (IC<sub>50</sub> = 32.46, 23.21, 7.74, 35.85 μM, respectively) compared to the reference drug acarbose (IC<sub>50</sub> <strong>=</strong> 0.161 and 31.46 μM for α-glucosidase and α-amylase, respectively). The most active derivatives <strong>16b, 16c, 16e</strong> and <strong>16 k</strong> also revealed good <em>in vivo</em> hypoglycemic effect comparable to that of rosiglitazone. In addition, compounds <strong>16b</strong> and <strong>16c</strong> had the best COX-2 selectivity index (S.I. = 18.7, 31.7, respectively) compared to celecoxib (S.I. = 10.3). <em>In vivo</em> anti-inflammatory activity of the target derivatives <strong>16b, 16c, 16e</strong> and <strong>16 k</strong> supported the results of <em>in vitro</em> screening as the derivatives <strong>16b</strong> and <strong>16c</strong> (ED<sub>50</sub> = 8.2 and 24 mg/kg, respectively) were more potent than celecoxib (ED<sub>50</sub> = 30 mg/kg). <em>In silico</em> docking, ADME, toxicity, and molecular dynamic studies were carried out to explain the interactions of the most active anti-diabetic and anti-inflammatory compounds <strong>16b, 16c, 16e</strong> and <strong>16 k</strong> with the target enzymes in addition to their physiochemical parameters.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":257,"journal":{"name":"Bioorganic Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioorganic Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045206824006655","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A novel series of thiazole derivatives with pyrazole scaffold 16a-l as hybrid rosiglitazone/celecoxib analogs was designed, synthesized and tested for its PPAR-γ activation, α-glucosidase, α-amylase and COX-2 inhibitory activities. Regarding the anti-diabetic activity, all compounds were assessed in vitro against PPAR-γ activation, α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibition in addition to in vivo hypoglycemic activity (one day and 15 days studies). Compounds 16b, 16c, 16e and 16 k showed good PPAR-γ activation (activation % ≈ 72–79 %) compared to that of the reference drug rosiglitazone (74 %). In addition, the same derivatives 16b, 16c, 16e and 16 k showed the highest inhibitory activities against α-glucosidase (IC50 = 0.158, 0.314, 0.305, 0.128 μM, respectively) and against α-amylase (IC50 = 32.46, 23.21, 7.74, 35.85 μM, respectively) compared to the reference drug acarbose (IC50 = 0.161 and 31.46 μM for α-glucosidase and α-amylase, respectively). The most active derivatives 16b, 16c, 16e and 16 k also revealed good in vivo hypoglycemic effect comparable to that of rosiglitazone. In addition, compounds 16b and 16c had the best COX-2 selectivity index (S.I. = 18.7, 31.7, respectively) compared to celecoxib (S.I. = 10.3). In vivo anti-inflammatory activity of the target derivatives 16b, 16c, 16e and 16 k supported the results of in vitro screening as the derivatives 16b and 16c (ED50 = 8.2 and 24 mg/kg, respectively) were more potent than celecoxib (ED50 = 30 mg/kg). In silico docking, ADME, toxicity, and molecular dynamic studies were carried out to explain the interactions of the most active anti-diabetic and anti-inflammatory compounds 16b, 16c, 16e and 16 k with the target enzymes in addition to their physiochemical parameters.

Abstract Image

发现含有吡唑支架的新型噻唑衍生物,作为 PPAR-γ 激动剂、α-葡萄糖苷酶、α-淀粉酶和 COX-2 抑制剂;设计、合成和硅学研究
本研究设计、合成了一系列新型吡唑支架噻唑衍生物 16a-l,作为罗格列酮/塞来昔布混合类似物,并对其 PPAR-γ 激活、α-葡萄糖苷酶、α-淀粉酶和 COX-2 抑制活性进行了测试。关于抗糖尿病活性,除了体内降血糖活性(一天和 15 天研究)外,还对所有化合物的 PPAR-γ 激活、α-葡萄糖苷酶和α-淀粉酶抑制进行了体外评估。与参考药物罗格列酮(74%)相比,化合物 16b、16c、16e 和 16 k 显示出良好的 PPAR-γ 激活效果(激活率≈ 72-79%)。此外,相同的衍生物 16b、16c、16e 和 16 k 对α-葡萄糖苷酶(IC50 = 0.158、0.314、0.305、0.128 μM)和α-淀粉酶(IC50 = 32.46, 23.21, 7.74, 35.85 μM)相比,参考药物阿卡波糖(对α-葡萄糖苷酶和α-淀粉酶的 IC50 分别为 0.161 和 31.46 μM)的活性最高。活性最高的衍生物 16b、16c、16e 和 16 k 也显示出良好的体内降糖效果,与罗格列酮相当。此外,与塞来昔布(S.I. = 10.3)相比,化合物 16b 和 16c 具有最佳的 COX-2 选择性指数(S.I. = 18.7 和 31.7)。目标衍生物 16b、16c、16e 和 16 k 的体内抗炎活性支持体外筛选的结果,因为衍生物 16b 和 16c(ED50 分别为 8.2 和 24 毫克/千克)比塞来昔布(ED50 为 30 毫克/千克)更有效。为了解释活性最强的抗糖尿病和抗炎化合物 16b、16c、16e 和 16 k 与目标酶之间的相互作用,除了它们的理化参数之外,还进行了硅对接、ADME、毒性和分子动力学研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioorganic Chemistry
Bioorganic Chemistry 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
679
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Bioorganic Chemistry publishes research that addresses biological questions at the molecular level, using organic chemistry and principles of physical organic chemistry. The scope of the journal covers a range of topics at the organic chemistry-biology interface, including: enzyme catalysis, biotransformation and enzyme inhibition; nucleic acids chemistry; medicinal chemistry; natural product chemistry, natural product synthesis and natural product biosynthesis; antimicrobial agents; lipid and peptide chemistry; biophysical chemistry; biological probes; bio-orthogonal chemistry and biomimetic chemistry. For manuscripts dealing with synthetic bioactive compounds, the Journal requires that the molecular target of the compounds described must be known, and must be demonstrated experimentally in the manuscript. For studies involving natural products, if the molecular target is unknown, some data beyond simple cell-based toxicity studies to provide insight into the mechanism of action is required. Studies supported by molecular docking are welcome, but must be supported by experimental data. The Journal does not consider manuscripts that are purely theoretical or computational in nature. The Journal publishes regular articles, short communications and reviews. Reviews are normally invited by Editors or Editorial Board members. Authors of unsolicited reviews should first contact an Editor or Editorial Board member to determine whether the proposed article is within the scope of the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信