Geochemistry and U–Pb geochronology of detrital zircon grains in beach sediments from the northwestern gulf of Mexico, Tamaulipas, Mexico: Implication for provenance
Mayank Shukla , Sanjeet K. Verma , Mayla A. Ramos-Vázquez , John S. Armstrong-Altrin , Sumit Mishra , Elson P. Oliveira , Eduardo González-Partida
{"title":"Geochemistry and U–Pb geochronology of detrital zircon grains in beach sediments from the northwestern gulf of Mexico, Tamaulipas, Mexico: Implication for provenance","authors":"Mayank Shukla , Sanjeet K. Verma , Mayla A. Ramos-Vázquez , John S. Armstrong-Altrin , Sumit Mishra , Elson P. Oliveira , Eduardo González-Partida","doi":"10.1016/j.apgeochem.2024.106148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The mineralogy, bulk geochemical composition, chemistry and U–Pb ages of detrital zircons in sediments from the La Pesca (LP) and Tesoro Altamira (TA) beaches, NW Gulf of Mexico are analyzed. The aim of this study is to infer the weathering history and provenance of sediments, and to identify the potential source terranes that are contributing sediments to the LP and TA beach areas. The beach sediments are rich in quartz and aluminosilicates. The Chemical Index of Weathering (CIW') and trace elements such as Th, Sr, U, and Ba reveal high weathering intensity for the LP and TA beach sediments. Major-element based diagrams and trace elemental ratios based on Co, Cr, Sc, La, and Th contents in sediments indicate felsic provenance, which is further supported by a negative europium anomaly and rare earth element (REE) patterns. The Th/U ratios (>0.3) together with positive cerium and negative europium anomalies of zircons in the LP and TA beaches indicate igneous origin. The comparison of zircon U–Pb ages of this study with ages reported from the adjacent terranes revealed that the Proterozoic (Paleoproterozoic: 1607.07–1943.45 Ma and Mesoproterozoic: 1021.19–1586.52 Ma) zircons are derived from the Oaxaquia, Mesa Central, Sierra Madre Oriental Provinces of Mexico and Mazatzal–Yavapai Province of the USA. On the other hand, Mesozoic (Jurassic 146.49–199.43 Ma and Cretaceous 68.46–136.82 Ma) and Cenozoic (Eocene 33.97–51.46 Ma and Oligocene 23.39–33.86 Ma) zircons are contributed by the Mexican volcanic rocks, Mesa Central and Sierra Madre Oriental Provinces in Mexico, and Mogollon-Datil Volcanic field and Colorado Plateau in USA. The rivers and their tributaries draining from the source areas are considered as a carrier and agent of distributing sediments along the northwestern Gulf of Mexico coastal areas, which are subsequently mixed by littoral currents.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8064,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geochemistry","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 106148"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883292724002531","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The mineralogy, bulk geochemical composition, chemistry and U–Pb ages of detrital zircons in sediments from the La Pesca (LP) and Tesoro Altamira (TA) beaches, NW Gulf of Mexico are analyzed. The aim of this study is to infer the weathering history and provenance of sediments, and to identify the potential source terranes that are contributing sediments to the LP and TA beach areas. The beach sediments are rich in quartz and aluminosilicates. The Chemical Index of Weathering (CIW') and trace elements such as Th, Sr, U, and Ba reveal high weathering intensity for the LP and TA beach sediments. Major-element based diagrams and trace elemental ratios based on Co, Cr, Sc, La, and Th contents in sediments indicate felsic provenance, which is further supported by a negative europium anomaly and rare earth element (REE) patterns. The Th/U ratios (>0.3) together with positive cerium and negative europium anomalies of zircons in the LP and TA beaches indicate igneous origin. The comparison of zircon U–Pb ages of this study with ages reported from the adjacent terranes revealed that the Proterozoic (Paleoproterozoic: 1607.07–1943.45 Ma and Mesoproterozoic: 1021.19–1586.52 Ma) zircons are derived from the Oaxaquia, Mesa Central, Sierra Madre Oriental Provinces of Mexico and Mazatzal–Yavapai Province of the USA. On the other hand, Mesozoic (Jurassic 146.49–199.43 Ma and Cretaceous 68.46–136.82 Ma) and Cenozoic (Eocene 33.97–51.46 Ma and Oligocene 23.39–33.86 Ma) zircons are contributed by the Mexican volcanic rocks, Mesa Central and Sierra Madre Oriental Provinces in Mexico, and Mogollon-Datil Volcanic field and Colorado Plateau in USA. The rivers and their tributaries draining from the source areas are considered as a carrier and agent of distributing sediments along the northwestern Gulf of Mexico coastal areas, which are subsequently mixed by littoral currents.
期刊介绍:
Applied Geochemistry is an international journal devoted to publication of original research papers, rapid research communications and selected review papers in geochemistry and urban geochemistry which have some practical application to an aspect of human endeavour, such as the preservation of the environment, health, waste disposal and the search for resources. Papers on applications of inorganic, organic and isotope geochemistry and geochemical processes are therefore welcome provided they meet the main criterion. Spatial and temporal monitoring case studies are only of interest to our international readership if they present new ideas of broad application.
Topics covered include: (1) Environmental geochemistry (including natural and anthropogenic aspects, and protection and remediation strategies); (2) Hydrogeochemistry (surface and groundwater); (3) Medical (urban) geochemistry; (4) The search for energy resources (in particular unconventional oil and gas or emerging metal resources); (5) Energy exploitation (in particular geothermal energy and CCS); (6) Upgrading of energy and mineral resources where there is a direct geochemical application; and (7) Waste disposal, including nuclear waste disposal.