Preload responsiveness–guided fluid removal in mechanically ventilated patients with fluid overload: A comprehensive clinical–physiological study

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Ricardo Castro , Pablo Born , Eric Roessler , Christian Labra , Paul McNab , Sebastián Bravo , Dagoberto Soto , Eduardo Kattan , Glenn Hernández , Jan Bakker
{"title":"Preload responsiveness–guided fluid removal in mechanically ventilated patients with fluid overload: A comprehensive clinical–physiological study","authors":"Ricardo Castro ,&nbsp;Pablo Born ,&nbsp;Eric Roessler ,&nbsp;Christian Labra ,&nbsp;Paul McNab ,&nbsp;Sebastián Bravo ,&nbsp;Dagoberto Soto ,&nbsp;Eduardo Kattan ,&nbsp;Glenn Hernández ,&nbsp;Jan Bakker","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigated fluid removal strategies for critically ill patients with fluid overload on mechanical ventilation. Traditionally, a negative fluid balance (FB) is aimed for. However, this approach can have drawbacks. Here, we compared a new approach, namely removing fluids until patients become fluid responsive (FR) to the traditional empiric negative balance approach.</p><p>Twelve patients were placed in each group (<em>n</em> = 24). FR assessment was performed using passive leg raising (PLR). Both groups maintained stable blood pressure and heart function during fluid management. Notably, the FR group weaned from the ventilator significantly faster than negative FB group (both for a spontaneous breathing trial (14 h vs. 36 h, <em>p</em> = 0.031) and extubation (26 h vs. 57 h, <em>p</em> = 0.007); the difference in total ventilator time wasn't statistically significant (49 h vs. 62 h, <em>p</em> = 0.065). Additionally, FR group avoided metabolic problems like secondary alkalosis and potential hypokalemia seen in the negative FB group.</p><p>FR-guided fluid-removal in fluid overloaded mechanically ventilated patients was a feasible, safe, and maybe superior strategy in facilitating weaning and disconnection from mechanical ventilation than negative FB-driven fluid removal. FR is a safe endpoint for optimizing cardiac function and preventing adverse consequences during fluid removal.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical care","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 154901"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944124003885","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated fluid removal strategies for critically ill patients with fluid overload on mechanical ventilation. Traditionally, a negative fluid balance (FB) is aimed for. However, this approach can have drawbacks. Here, we compared a new approach, namely removing fluids until patients become fluid responsive (FR) to the traditional empiric negative balance approach.

Twelve patients were placed in each group (n = 24). FR assessment was performed using passive leg raising (PLR). Both groups maintained stable blood pressure and heart function during fluid management. Notably, the FR group weaned from the ventilator significantly faster than negative FB group (both for a spontaneous breathing trial (14 h vs. 36 h, p = 0.031) and extubation (26 h vs. 57 h, p = 0.007); the difference in total ventilator time wasn't statistically significant (49 h vs. 62 h, p = 0.065). Additionally, FR group avoided metabolic problems like secondary alkalosis and potential hypokalemia seen in the negative FB group.

FR-guided fluid-removal in fluid overloaded mechanically ventilated patients was a feasible, safe, and maybe superior strategy in facilitating weaning and disconnection from mechanical ventilation than negative FB-driven fluid removal. FR is a safe endpoint for optimizing cardiac function and preventing adverse consequences during fluid removal.

在体液超负荷的机械通气患者中以前负荷反应为指导进行液体清除:临床生理学综合研究
本研究调查了使用机械通气的体液超负荷重症患者的体液清除策略。传统上,体液负平衡(FB)是目标。然而,这种方法可能存在缺陷。在这里,我们比较了一种新方法,即在患者出现体液反应(FR)之前移除液体与传统的经验性负平衡方法。每组各 12 名患者(n = 24),采用被动抬腿(PLR)法进行体液反应评估。在输液过程中,两组患者的血压和心脏功能均保持稳定。值得注意的是,FR 组从呼吸机中断气的时间明显快于 FB 负性组(无论是自主呼吸试验(14 小时 vs. 36 小时,p = 0.031)还是拔管(26 小时 vs. 57 小时,p = 0.007);呼吸机总时间的差异无统计学意义(49 小时 vs. 62 小时,p = 0.065)。此外,FR 组避免了阴性 FB 组出现的继发性碱中毒和潜在的低钾血症等代谢问题。在液体超负荷的机械通气患者中,FR 引导的液体移除是一种可行、安全的策略,在促进断奶和脱离机械通气方面可能优于阴性 FB 驱动的液体移除。在液体移除过程中,FR 是优化心脏功能和防止不良后果的安全终点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of critical care
Journal of critical care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.70%
发文量
237
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Critical Care, the official publication of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM), is a leading international, peer-reviewed journal providing original research, review articles, tutorials, and invited articles for physicians and allied health professionals involved in treating the critically ill. The Journal aims to improve patient care by furthering understanding of health systems research and its integration into clinical practice. The Journal will include articles which discuss: All aspects of health services research in critical care System based practice in anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine The interface between anesthesiology, critical care medicine and pain Integrating intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management and recovery Optimizing patient management, i.e., exploring the interface between evidence-based principles or clinical insight into management and care of complex patients The team approach in the OR and ICU System-based research Medical ethics Technology in medicine Seminars discussing current, state of the art, and sometimes controversial topics in anesthesiology, critical care medicine, and professional education Residency Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信