Traditional Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and BERT (Large Language Model) Approaches for Predicting Hospitalizations From Nurse Triage Notes: Comparative Evaluation of Resource Management.

JMIR AI Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.2196/52190
Dhavalkumar Patel, Prem Timsina, Larisa Gorenstein, Benjamin S Glicksberg, Ganesh Raut, Satya Narayan Cheetirala, Fabio Santana, Jules Tamegue, Arash Kia, Eyal Zimlichman, Matthew A Levin, Robert Freeman, Eyal Klang
{"title":"Traditional Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and BERT (Large Language Model) Approaches for Predicting Hospitalizations From Nurse Triage Notes: Comparative Evaluation of Resource Management.","authors":"Dhavalkumar Patel, Prem Timsina, Larisa Gorenstein, Benjamin S Glicksberg, Ganesh Raut, Satya Narayan Cheetirala, Fabio Santana, Jules Tamegue, Arash Kia, Eyal Zimlichman, Matthew A Levin, Robert Freeman, Eyal Klang","doi":"10.2196/52190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Predicting hospitalization from nurse triage notes has the potential to augment care. However, there needs to be careful considerations for which models to choose for this goal. Specifically, health systems will have varying degrees of computational infrastructure available and budget constraints.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To this end, we compared the performance of the deep learning, Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT)-based model, Bio-Clinical-BERT, with a bag-of-words (BOW) logistic regression (LR) model incorporating term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF). These choices represent different levels of computational requirements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from 1,391,988 patients who visited emergency departments in the Mount Sinai Health System spanning from 2017 to 2022. The models were trained on 4 hospitals' data and externally validated on a fifth hospital's data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Bio-Clinical-BERT model achieved higher areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.82, 0.84, and 0.85) compared to the BOW-LR-TF-IDF model (0.81, 0.83, and 0.84) across training sets of 10,000; 100,000; and ~1,000,000 patients, respectively. Notably, both models proved effective at using triage notes for prediction, despite the modest performance gap.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that simpler machine learning models such as BOW-LR-TF-IDF could serve adequately in resource-limited settings. Given the potential implications for patient care and hospital resource management, further exploration of alternative models and techniques is warranted to enhance predictive performance in this critical domain.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>RR2-10.1101/2023.08.07.23293699.</p>","PeriodicalId":73551,"journal":{"name":"JMIR AI","volume":"3 ","pages":"e52190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11387908/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/52190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Predicting hospitalization from nurse triage notes has the potential to augment care. However, there needs to be careful considerations for which models to choose for this goal. Specifically, health systems will have varying degrees of computational infrastructure available and budget constraints.

Objective: To this end, we compared the performance of the deep learning, Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT)-based model, Bio-Clinical-BERT, with a bag-of-words (BOW) logistic regression (LR) model incorporating term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF). These choices represent different levels of computational requirements.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from 1,391,988 patients who visited emergency departments in the Mount Sinai Health System spanning from 2017 to 2022. The models were trained on 4 hospitals' data and externally validated on a fifth hospital's data.

Results: The Bio-Clinical-BERT model achieved higher areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.82, 0.84, and 0.85) compared to the BOW-LR-TF-IDF model (0.81, 0.83, and 0.84) across training sets of 10,000; 100,000; and ~1,000,000 patients, respectively. Notably, both models proved effective at using triage notes for prediction, despite the modest performance gap.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that simpler machine learning models such as BOW-LR-TF-IDF could serve adequately in resource-limited settings. Given the potential implications for patient care and hospital resource management, further exploration of alternative models and techniques is warranted to enhance predictive performance in this critical domain.

International registered report identifier (irrid): RR2-10.1101/2023.08.07.23293699.

从护士分诊记录预测住院情况的传统机器学习、深度学习和 BERT(大型语言模型)方法:资源管理比较评估。
背景:从护士分诊记录中预测住院情况有可能增强护理效果。然而,要实现这一目标,需要慎重考虑选择何种模型。具体来说,医疗系统将面临不同程度的计算基础设施可用性和预算限制:为此,我们比较了基于深度学习、变换器双向编码器表征(BERT)的 Bio-Clinical-BERT 模型与包含词频-反向文档频率(TF-IDF)的词袋逻辑回归(BOW)模型的性能。这些选择代表了不同程度的计算要求:使用西奈山医疗系统急诊科就诊的 1,391,988 名患者的数据进行了回顾性分析,时间跨度为 2017 年至 2022 年。模型在 4 家医院的数据上进行了训练,并在第五家医院的数据上进行了外部验证:与 BOW-LR-TF-IDF 模型(0.81、0.83 和 0.84)相比,Bio-Clinical-BERT 模型在 10,000 人、100,000 人和约 1,000,000 人的训练集中分别获得了更高的接收者操作特征曲线下面积(0.82、0.84 和 0.85)。值得注意的是,尽管性能差距不大,但这两种模型在使用分诊记录进行预测方面都证明是有效的:我们的研究结果表明,BOW-LR-TF-IDF 等较简单的机器学习模型可以在资源有限的环境中充分发挥作用。考虑到对患者护理和医院资源管理的潜在影响,有必要进一步探索替代模型和技术,以提高这一关键领域的预测性能:RR2-10.1101/2023.08.07.23293699.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信