US-based Radiomics Analysis of Different Machine Learning Models for Differentiating Benign and Malignant BI-RADS 4A Breast Lesions.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Academic Radiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2024.08.024
Jieyi Ye, Yinting Chen, Jiawei Pan, Yide Qiu, Zhuoru Luo, Yue Xiong, Yanping He, Yingyu Chen, Fuqing Xie, Weijun Huang
{"title":"US-based Radiomics Analysis of Different Machine Learning Models for Differentiating Benign and Malignant BI-RADS 4A Breast Lesions.","authors":"Jieyi Ye, Yinting Chen, Jiawei Pan, Yide Qiu, Zhuoru Luo, Yue Xiong, Yanping He, Yingyu Chen, Fuqing Xie, Weijun Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.08.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>To investigate and authenticate the effectiveness of various radiomics models in distinguishing between benign and malignant BI-RADS 4A lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 936 patients with pathologically confirmed 4A lesions were included in the study (training cohort: n = 655; test cohort: n = 281). Radiomic features were derived from greyscale US images. Following dimensionality reduction and feature selection, radiomics models were developed using logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and multilayer perceptron (MLP) algorithms. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were employed to investigate clinical-radiological characteristics and determine variables for creating a clinical model. Five combined models integrating radiomic and clinical parameters were constructed by using each algorithm, and comparison with radiologists' performance was performed. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach was used to elucidate the radiomic model by ranking the significance of features based on their contribution to the evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1561 radiomic features were extracted. Thirty-six features were deemed significant by dimensionality reduction and selection. The radiomic models showed good performance with AUCs of 0.829-0.945 in training cohort; and 0.805-0.857 in test cohort. The combined model developed by using LR showed the best performance (AUC, training cohort: 0.909; test cohort: 0.905), which is superior to radiologists' performance. Decision curve analysis (DCA) of this combined model indicated better clinical efficacy than clinical and radiomic models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combined model integrating radiomic and clinical features demonstrated excellent performance in differentiating between benign and malignant 4A lesions. It may offer a non-invasive and efficient approach to aid in clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"67-78"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2024.08.024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and objectives: To investigate and authenticate the effectiveness of various radiomics models in distinguishing between benign and malignant BI-RADS 4A lesions.

Methods: A total of 936 patients with pathologically confirmed 4A lesions were included in the study (training cohort: n = 655; test cohort: n = 281). Radiomic features were derived from greyscale US images. Following dimensionality reduction and feature selection, radiomics models were developed using logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and multilayer perceptron (MLP) algorithms. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were employed to investigate clinical-radiological characteristics and determine variables for creating a clinical model. Five combined models integrating radiomic and clinical parameters were constructed by using each algorithm, and comparison with radiologists' performance was performed. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach was used to elucidate the radiomic model by ranking the significance of features based on their contribution to the evaluation.

Results: A total of 1561 radiomic features were extracted. Thirty-six features were deemed significant by dimensionality reduction and selection. The radiomic models showed good performance with AUCs of 0.829-0.945 in training cohort; and 0.805-0.857 in test cohort. The combined model developed by using LR showed the best performance (AUC, training cohort: 0.909; test cohort: 0.905), which is superior to radiologists' performance. Decision curve analysis (DCA) of this combined model indicated better clinical efficacy than clinical and radiomic models.

Conclusions: The combined model integrating radiomic and clinical features demonstrated excellent performance in differentiating between benign and malignant 4A lesions. It may offer a non-invasive and efficient approach to aid in clinical decision-making.

基于 US 的放射组学分析不同机器学习模型对良性和恶性 BI-RADS 4A 乳腺病变的区分。
理论依据和目标:研究和验证各种放射组学模型在区分良性和恶性 BI-RADS 4A 病变方面的有效性:研究共纳入936例经病理证实的4A病变患者(训练队列:n = 655;测试队列:n = 281)。放射学特征来自灰度 US 图像。在降维和特征选择之后,使用逻辑回归(LR)、支持向量机(SVM)、随机森林(RF)、极梯度提升(XGBoost)和多层感知器(MLP)算法开发了放射组学模型。采用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析来研究临床放射学特征,并确定用于创建临床模型的变量。使用每种算法构建了五个综合放射学和临床参数的模型,并与放射科医生的表现进行了比较。采用SHAPLEY Additive exPlanations(SHAP)方法,根据特征对评估的贡献大小对其重要性进行排序,从而阐明放射学模型:结果:共提取了 1561 个放射学特征。通过降维和选择,36 个特征被认为是重要特征。放射学模型表现良好,训练队列的AUC为0.829-0.945;测试队列的AUC为0.805-0.857。使用 LR 开发的组合模型表现最佳(AUC,训练队列:0.909;测试队列:0.905),优于放射科医生的表现。该组合模型的决策曲线分析(DCA)表明,其临床疗效优于临床模型和放射学模型:综合放射学和临床特征的组合模型在区分良性和恶性 4A 病变方面表现出色。它可以为临床决策提供一种无创、高效的辅助方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信