How to Evaluate the Efficacy of Manipulations in Spine Disorders-A Comprehensive Review of New and Traditional Outcome Measures.

IF 1.7 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Giacomo Farì, Carlo Mariconda, Laura Dell'Anna, Francesco Quarta, Danilo Donati, Cristiano Sconza, Vincenzo Ricci, Giustino Varrassi, Valeria Coco, Alessandro Manelli, Ennio Spadini, Maria Teresa Giglio, Andrea Bernetti
{"title":"How to Evaluate the Efficacy of Manipulations in Spine Disorders-A Comprehensive Review of New and Traditional Outcome Measures.","authors":"Giacomo Farì, Carlo Mariconda, Laura Dell'Anna, Francesco Quarta, Danilo Donati, Cristiano Sconza, Vincenzo Ricci, Giustino Varrassi, Valeria Coco, Alessandro Manelli, Ennio Spadini, Maria Teresa Giglio, Andrea Bernetti","doi":"10.3390/clinpract14040119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spine pain (SP) is the most common musculoskeletal disorder that causes transitional forms of motor disability. Considering its affordability and safety, manipulative therapy (MT) stands as one of the primary therapeutic approaches for SP and the related dysfunctional consequences. However, it is still difficult to assess and quantify the results of this treatment since there is a lack of objective evaluation tools in the available scientific literature. Thus, the purpose of this comprehensive review is to summarize the main outcomes used to evaluate the effectiveness of spine manipulations, focusing on their strengths and weaknesses. An extensive review of the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases was performed to identify the literature of the last ten years regarding MT and the related assessment tools. A total of 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. The analyzed literature indicates that a wide range of outcome measures have been used to assess the effectiveness of spine MT. Pain is the main aspect to be investigated but it remains difficult to elucidate since it is strongly linked to various dimensions such as self-perception and psychological aspects. Therefore, it seems necessary to include new tools for evaluating the effects of spine MT, with the aim of exploiting new technologies and taking into consideration the SP biomechanical and biopsychosocial aspects.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"14 4","pages":"1478-1495"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11352299/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14040119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spine pain (SP) is the most common musculoskeletal disorder that causes transitional forms of motor disability. Considering its affordability and safety, manipulative therapy (MT) stands as one of the primary therapeutic approaches for SP and the related dysfunctional consequences. However, it is still difficult to assess and quantify the results of this treatment since there is a lack of objective evaluation tools in the available scientific literature. Thus, the purpose of this comprehensive review is to summarize the main outcomes used to evaluate the effectiveness of spine manipulations, focusing on their strengths and weaknesses. An extensive review of the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases was performed to identify the literature of the last ten years regarding MT and the related assessment tools. A total of 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. The analyzed literature indicates that a wide range of outcome measures have been used to assess the effectiveness of spine MT. Pain is the main aspect to be investigated but it remains difficult to elucidate since it is strongly linked to various dimensions such as self-perception and psychological aspects. Therefore, it seems necessary to include new tools for evaluating the effects of spine MT, with the aim of exploiting new technologies and taking into consideration the SP biomechanical and biopsychosocial aspects.

如何评估脊柱疾病手法治疗的疗效--全面回顾新的和传统的疗效测量方法。
脊柱疼痛(SP)是最常见的肌肉骨骼疾病,会导致过渡形式的运动障碍。考虑到其经济性和安全性,手法治疗(MT)是治疗脊柱痛及其相关功能障碍后果的主要方法之一。然而,由于现有的科学文献中缺乏客观的评估工具,因此仍然很难对这种治疗方法的效果进行评估和量化。因此,本综合综述旨在总结用于评估脊柱手法治疗效果的主要结果,重点关注其优缺点。我们对 PubMed、Cochrane 和 Embase 数据库进行了广泛的检索,以确定过去十年中有关 MT 和相关评估工具的文献。共有 12 项研究符合纳入标准。分析的文献表明,有多种结果测量方法被用于评估脊柱MT的有效性。疼痛是需要研究的主要方面,但由于它与自我感觉和心理等多个方面密切相关,因此仍然难以阐明。因此,似乎有必要采用新的工具来评估脊柱矫形术的效果,目的是利用新技术并考虑到脊柱矫形术的生物力学和生物心理社会方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinics and Practice
Clinics and Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信