AIDA (Artificial Intelligence Dystocia Algorithm) in Prolonged Dystocic Labor: Focus on Asynclitism Degree.

IF 2.7 Q3 IMAGING SCIENCE & PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY
Antonio Malvasi, Lorenzo E Malgieri, Ettore Cicinelli, Antonella Vimercati, Reuven Achiron, Radmila Sparić, Antonio D'Amato, Giorgio Maria Baldini, Miriam Dellino, Giuseppe Trojano, Renata Beck, Tommaso Difonzo, Andrea Tinelli
{"title":"AIDA (Artificial Intelligence Dystocia Algorithm) in Prolonged Dystocic Labor: Focus on Asynclitism Degree.","authors":"Antonio Malvasi, Lorenzo E Malgieri, Ettore Cicinelli, Antonella Vimercati, Reuven Achiron, Radmila Sparić, Antonio D'Amato, Giorgio Maria Baldini, Miriam Dellino, Giuseppe Trojano, Renata Beck, Tommaso Difonzo, Andrea Tinelli","doi":"10.3390/jimaging10080194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Asynclitism, a misalignment of the fetal head with respect to the plane of passage through the birth canal, represents a significant obstetric challenge. High degrees of asynclitism are associated with labor dystocia, difficult operative delivery, and cesarean delivery. Despite its clinical relevance, the diagnosis of asynclitism and its influence on the outcome of labor remain matters of debate. This study analyzes the role of the degree of asynclitism (AD) in assessing labor progress and predicting labor outcome, focusing on its ability to predict intrapartum cesarean delivery (ICD) versus non-cesarean delivery. The study also aims to assess the performance of the AIDA (Artificial Intelligence Dystocia Algorithm) algorithm in integrating AD with other ultrasound parameters for predicting labor outcome. This retrospective study involved 135 full-term nulliparous patients with singleton fetuses in cephalic presentation undergoing neuraxial analgesia. Data were collected at three Italian hospitals between January 2014 and December 2020. In addition to routine digital vaginal examination, all patients underwent intrapartum ultrasound (IU) during protracted second stage of labor (greater than three hours). Four geometric parameters were measured using standard 3.5 MHz transabdominal ultrasound probes: head-to-symphysis distance (HSD), degree of asynclitism (AD), angle of progression (AoP), and midline angle (MLA). The AIDA algorithm, a machine learning-based decision support system, was used to classify patients into five classes (from 0 to 4) based on the values of the four geometric parameters and to predict labor outcome (ICD or non-ICD). Six machine learning algorithms were used: MLP (multi-layer perceptron), RF (random forest), SVM (support vector machine), XGBoost, LR (logistic regression), and DT (decision tree). Pearson's correlation was used to investigate the relationship between AD and the other parameters. A degree of asynclitism greater than 70 mm was found to be significantly associated with an increased rate of cesarean deliveries. Pearson's correlation analysis showed a weak to very weak correlation between AD and AoP (PC = 0.36, <i>p</i> < 0.001), AD and HSD (PC = 0.18, <i>p</i> < 0.05), and AD and MLA (PC = 0.14). The AIDA algorithm demonstrated high accuracy in predicting labor outcome, particularly for AIDA classes 0 and 4, with 100% agreement with physician-practiced labor outcome in two cases (RF and SVM algorithms) and slightly lower agreement with MLP. For AIDA class 3, the RF algorithm performed best, with an accuracy of 92%. AD, in combination with HSD, MLA, and AoP, plays a significant role in predicting labor dystocia and labor outcome. The AIDA algorithm, based on these four geometric parameters, has proven to be a promising decision support tool for predicting labor outcome and may help reduce the need for unnecessary cesarean deliveries, while improving maternal-fetal outcomes. Future studies with larger cohorts are needed to further validate these findings and refine the cut-off thresholds for AD and other parameters in the AIDA algorithm.</p>","PeriodicalId":37035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Imaging","volume":"10 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11355300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging10080194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMAGING SCIENCE & PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Asynclitism, a misalignment of the fetal head with respect to the plane of passage through the birth canal, represents a significant obstetric challenge. High degrees of asynclitism are associated with labor dystocia, difficult operative delivery, and cesarean delivery. Despite its clinical relevance, the diagnosis of asynclitism and its influence on the outcome of labor remain matters of debate. This study analyzes the role of the degree of asynclitism (AD) in assessing labor progress and predicting labor outcome, focusing on its ability to predict intrapartum cesarean delivery (ICD) versus non-cesarean delivery. The study also aims to assess the performance of the AIDA (Artificial Intelligence Dystocia Algorithm) algorithm in integrating AD with other ultrasound parameters for predicting labor outcome. This retrospective study involved 135 full-term nulliparous patients with singleton fetuses in cephalic presentation undergoing neuraxial analgesia. Data were collected at three Italian hospitals between January 2014 and December 2020. In addition to routine digital vaginal examination, all patients underwent intrapartum ultrasound (IU) during protracted second stage of labor (greater than three hours). Four geometric parameters were measured using standard 3.5 MHz transabdominal ultrasound probes: head-to-symphysis distance (HSD), degree of asynclitism (AD), angle of progression (AoP), and midline angle (MLA). The AIDA algorithm, a machine learning-based decision support system, was used to classify patients into five classes (from 0 to 4) based on the values of the four geometric parameters and to predict labor outcome (ICD or non-ICD). Six machine learning algorithms were used: MLP (multi-layer perceptron), RF (random forest), SVM (support vector machine), XGBoost, LR (logistic regression), and DT (decision tree). Pearson's correlation was used to investigate the relationship between AD and the other parameters. A degree of asynclitism greater than 70 mm was found to be significantly associated with an increased rate of cesarean deliveries. Pearson's correlation analysis showed a weak to very weak correlation between AD and AoP (PC = 0.36, p < 0.001), AD and HSD (PC = 0.18, p < 0.05), and AD and MLA (PC = 0.14). The AIDA algorithm demonstrated high accuracy in predicting labor outcome, particularly for AIDA classes 0 and 4, with 100% agreement with physician-practiced labor outcome in two cases (RF and SVM algorithms) and slightly lower agreement with MLP. For AIDA class 3, the RF algorithm performed best, with an accuracy of 92%. AD, in combination with HSD, MLA, and AoP, plays a significant role in predicting labor dystocia and labor outcome. The AIDA algorithm, based on these four geometric parameters, has proven to be a promising decision support tool for predicting labor outcome and may help reduce the need for unnecessary cesarean deliveries, while improving maternal-fetal outcomes. Future studies with larger cohorts are needed to further validate these findings and refine the cut-off thresholds for AD and other parameters in the AIDA algorithm.

AIDA (人工智能难产算法)在难产产程延长中的应用:关注非同步化程度。
胎头不齐(Asynclitism)是指胎儿头部与通过产道的平面错位,是产科的一大难题。高度异位与分娩难产、难产手术和剖宫产有关。尽管与临床相关,异位的诊断及其对分娩结果的影响仍存在争议。本研究分析了异位程度(AD)在评估产程进展和预测分娩结局中的作用,重点关注其预测产中剖宫产(ICD)与非剖宫产的能力。该研究还旨在评估 AIDA(人工智能难产算法)算法在将 AD 与其他超声参数相结合以预测分娩结果方面的性能。这项回顾性研究涉及135名接受神经轴镇痛的头位单胎足月无痛分娩患者。数据收集于 2014 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间的三家意大利医院。除常规数字阴道检查外,所有患者均在第二产程延长期间(超过三小时)接受了产程超声检查(IU)。使用标准的 3.5 MHz 经腹超声探头测量了四个几何参数:头到骨骺的距离 (HSD)、不对称度 (AD)、进展角 (AoP) 和中线角 (MLA)。AIDA 算法是一种基于机器学习的决策支持系统,用于根据四个几何参数的值将患者分为五个等级(从 0 到 4),并预测分娩结果(ICD 或非 ICD)。该系统使用了六种机器学习算法:MLP(多层感知器)、RF(随机森林)、SVM(支持向量机)、XGBoost、LR(逻辑回归)和 DT(决策树)。采用皮尔逊相关性来研究 AD 与其他参数之间的关系。结果发现,不对称程度大于 70 毫米与剖宫产率增加有显著相关性。皮尔逊相关分析表明,AD 与 AoP(PC = 0.36,p < 0.001)、AD 与 HSD(PC = 0.18,p < 0.05)、AD 与 MLA(PC = 0.14)之间存在弱到极弱的相关性。AIDA 算法在预测分娩结局方面表现出很高的准确性,尤其是对于 AIDA 0 级和 4 级,在两种情况下(RF 算法和 SVM 算法)与医生实践分娩结局的一致性达到 100%,而与 MLP 的一致性略低。对于 AIDA 分级 3,RF 算法表现最佳,准确率为 92%。AD与HSD、MLA和AoP相结合,在预测分娩难产和分娩结局方面发挥着重要作用。事实证明,基于这四个几何参数的AIDA算法是预测分娩结局的一种很有前途的决策支持工具,可帮助减少不必要的剖宫产,同时改善母胎结局。未来需要对更大的队列进行研究,以进一步验证这些发现,并完善AIDA算法中AD和其他参数的临界值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Imaging
Journal of Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
303
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信