Hye Jin Kim, Dong-Min Shin, Junho Cho, Kwanbum Lee, Jeea Lee, Hyung Seok Park
{"title":"Use of Advanced Energy Devices and Fiberoptic Retractors in Single-Incision Breast-Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer.","authors":"Hye Jin Kim, Dong-Min Shin, Junho Cho, Kwanbum Lee, Jeea Lee, Hyung Seok Park","doi":"10.3349/ymj.2023.0348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The use of advanced energy devices for mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection can reduce perioperative blood loss, seroma formation, and drainage duration/volume. Retraction using fiberoptic retractors can help visualize deep and narrow surgical fields. We aimed to compare the postoperative outcomes between single-incision breast-conserving surgery (SIBCS) and conventional breast-conserving surgery (CBCS) with axillary staging using advanced energy devices and conventional equipment, respectively.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 244 patients who underwent BCS with axillary surgery between March 2018 and September 2019 at Severance Hospital. The patients were grouped based on the device used to aid in axillary staging: CBCS group (n=117) used conventional electrocautery; and SIBCS group (n=127) used advanced energy devices and fiberoptic retractors. The two groups were compared for postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean patient age was 55.9 and 53.1 years in the CBCS and SIBCS groups, respectively. Incision size was significantly smaller in the SIBCS group than in the CBCS group (6.3±2.1 cm vs. 7.5±2.5 cm, <i>p</i>=0.044). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of operating time (126.0±40.0 min vs. 127.0±63.0 min, <i>p</i>=0.828), operative blood loss (11.0±31.0 mL vs. 7.0±18.0 mL, <i>p</i>=0.100), drainage duration (7.0±3.0 d vs. 8.0±4.0 d, <i>p</i>=0.288), and complications (1.70% vs. 2.36%, <i>p</i>=0.523).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using advanced energy devices for SIBCS with axillary staging reduced incision size and provided better cosmetic outcomes compared to those using the conventional method. Advanced energy devices may offer better surgical outcomes in patients who undergo BCS with axillary staging.</p>","PeriodicalId":23765,"journal":{"name":"Yonsei Medical Journal","volume":"65 9","pages":"511-518"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11359607/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yonsei Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2023.0348","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The use of advanced energy devices for mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection can reduce perioperative blood loss, seroma formation, and drainage duration/volume. Retraction using fiberoptic retractors can help visualize deep and narrow surgical fields. We aimed to compare the postoperative outcomes between single-incision breast-conserving surgery (SIBCS) and conventional breast-conserving surgery (CBCS) with axillary staging using advanced energy devices and conventional equipment, respectively.
Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 244 patients who underwent BCS with axillary surgery between March 2018 and September 2019 at Severance Hospital. The patients were grouped based on the device used to aid in axillary staging: CBCS group (n=117) used conventional electrocautery; and SIBCS group (n=127) used advanced energy devices and fiberoptic retractors. The two groups were compared for postoperative outcomes.
Results: The mean patient age was 55.9 and 53.1 years in the CBCS and SIBCS groups, respectively. Incision size was significantly smaller in the SIBCS group than in the CBCS group (6.3±2.1 cm vs. 7.5±2.5 cm, p=0.044). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of operating time (126.0±40.0 min vs. 127.0±63.0 min, p=0.828), operative blood loss (11.0±31.0 mL vs. 7.0±18.0 mL, p=0.100), drainage duration (7.0±3.0 d vs. 8.0±4.0 d, p=0.288), and complications (1.70% vs. 2.36%, p=0.523).
Conclusion: Using advanced energy devices for SIBCS with axillary staging reduced incision size and provided better cosmetic outcomes compared to those using the conventional method. Advanced energy devices may offer better surgical outcomes in patients who undergo BCS with axillary staging.
目的:在乳房切除术和腋窝淋巴结清扫术中使用先进的能量装置可减少围手术期失血、血清肿形成和引流时间/量。使用光纤牵引器进行牵引有助于观察深部和狭窄的手术区域。我们旨在比较单切口保乳手术(SIBCS)和传统保乳手术(CBCS)分别使用先进能量设备和传统设备进行腋窝分期的术后效果:我们回顾性审查了2018年3月至2019年9月期间在塞弗兰医院接受BCS与腋窝手术的244名患者的病历。根据用于辅助腋窝分期的设备对患者进行分组:CBCS组(人数=117)使用传统电烧;SIBCS组(人数=127)使用先进的能量设备和光纤牵引器。两组患者的术后效果进行了比较:CBCS组和SIBCS组患者的平均年龄分别为55.9岁和53.1岁。SIBCS 组切口尺寸明显小于 CBCS 组(6.3±2.1 厘米对 7.5±2.5 厘米,P=0.044)。两组在手术时间(126.0±40.0 min vs. 127.0±63.0 min,P=0.828)、手术失血量(11.0±31.0 mL vs. 7.0±18.0 mL,P=0.100)、引流时间(7.0±3.0 d vs. 8.0±4.0 d,P=0.288)和并发症(1.70% vs. 2.36%,P=0.523)方面无明显差异:结论:与传统方法相比,使用先进的能量设备进行腋窝分期SIBCS手术可减少切口面积,并提供更好的美容效果。先进的能量设备可为接受腋窝分期BCS手术的患者提供更好的手术效果。
期刊介绍:
The goal of the Yonsei Medical Journal (YMJ) is to publish high quality manuscripts dedicated to clinical or basic research. Any authors affiliated with an accredited biomedical institution may submit manuscripts of original articles, review articles, case reports, brief communications, and letters to the Editor.