Evaluating the Impact of Gender, Race, and Training Year on Internal Medicine Residents' Experiences Across the United States.

Q2 Social Sciences
The Permanente journal Pub Date : 2024-09-16 Epub Date: 2024-08-28 DOI:10.7812/TPP/24.085
Grace Kim, Shweta Lodha, Lulu Wein, Lily Fahs, Ariana Allen, Jay Rathinavelu, Poonam Sharma, Sharon Fekrat
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of Gender, Race, and Training Year on Internal Medicine Residents' Experiences Across the United States.","authors":"Grace Kim, Shweta Lodha, Lulu Wein, Lily Fahs, Ariana Allen, Jay Rathinavelu, Poonam Sharma, Sharon Fekrat","doi":"10.7812/TPP/24.085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prior studies have highlighted experiences of bias within resident training based on trainees' gender and race and high rates of burnout. However, few studies have addressed the intersection between bias and wellness for residents in internal medicine (IM) programs. This study explores how race, gender, and training year affect IM residents' bias experiences and well-being.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous survey with questions evaluating demographics and resident experiences of bias and perceptions of wellness and self-efficacy was distributed to 596 IM programs across the United States. Sixty-nine programs sent out the survey to their IM residents. Respondents to the survey included 176 residents. Descriptive analyses and χ<sup>2</sup> tests were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses demonstrated that gender and race impacted residents' experiences with bias and misidentification. Eighty-eight percent of women compared to 1% of men, and 89% of Black residents compared to 3% of White residents reported being misidentified as a nonphysician due to gender and race, respectively. Degrees to which residents felt they were thriving in residency, experiencing burnout, and utilizing their strengths varied significantly by gender. Residents' self-perceived burnout levels were associated with being misidentified as not being a physician due to race. Experiences with bias also increased significantly with training year.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study provides important insights into the impact of gender, race/ethnicity, and training year on IM residents' experiences with bias and self-perception.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings emphasize the need for structural changes within IM residency programs to reduce experiences of bias and to better cultivate the wellness of residents.</p>","PeriodicalId":23037,"journal":{"name":"The Permanente journal","volume":" ","pages":"107-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11404644/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Permanente journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/24.085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Prior studies have highlighted experiences of bias within resident training based on trainees' gender and race and high rates of burnout. However, few studies have addressed the intersection between bias and wellness for residents in internal medicine (IM) programs. This study explores how race, gender, and training year affect IM residents' bias experiences and well-being.

Methods: An anonymous survey with questions evaluating demographics and resident experiences of bias and perceptions of wellness and self-efficacy was distributed to 596 IM programs across the United States. Sixty-nine programs sent out the survey to their IM residents. Respondents to the survey included 176 residents. Descriptive analyses and χ2 tests were performed.

Results: Responses demonstrated that gender and race impacted residents' experiences with bias and misidentification. Eighty-eight percent of women compared to 1% of men, and 89% of Black residents compared to 3% of White residents reported being misidentified as a nonphysician due to gender and race, respectively. Degrees to which residents felt they were thriving in residency, experiencing burnout, and utilizing their strengths varied significantly by gender. Residents' self-perceived burnout levels were associated with being misidentified as not being a physician due to race. Experiences with bias also increased significantly with training year.

Discussion: This study provides important insights into the impact of gender, race/ethnicity, and training year on IM residents' experiences with bias and self-perception.

Conclusion: The findings emphasize the need for structural changes within IM residency programs to reduce experiences of bias and to better cultivate the wellness of residents.

评估性别、种族和培训年限对全美内科住院医生经历的影响。
导言:先前的研究强调了住院医师培训中基于学员性别和种族的偏见以及高倦怠率。然而,很少有研究涉及内科(IM)项目中住院医师的偏见与健康之间的交集。本研究探讨了种族、性别和培训年限如何影响内科住院医师的偏见体验和健康:我们向全美 596 个内科住院医师培训项目发放了一份匿名调查问卷,其中的问题包括人口统计学、住院医师的偏见经历以及对健康和自我效能的看法。69 个项目向其 IM 居民发送了调查问卷。调查对象包括 176 名住院医师。调查进行了描述性分析和χ2检验:调查结果显示,性别和种族影响了住院医师在偏见和误认方面的经历。88%的女性和 89%的黑人居民分别因性别和种族原因被误认为是非医生,而男性仅为 1%;黑人居民被误认为是非医生的比例为 89%,而白人居民仅为 3%。不同性别的住院医师认为自己在住院医师培训中茁壮成长、出现职业倦怠和发挥自身优势的程度有很大差异。住院医师自我感觉的职业倦怠程度与因种族原因被误认为不是医生有关。受偏见影响的经历也随着培训年限的增加而显著增加:讨论:本研究就性别、种族/族裔和培训年限对综管住院医师偏见经历和自我认知的影响提供了重要见解:结论:研究结果强调,有必要在综合医学住院医师培训项目中进行结构性改革,以减少偏见经历,更好地培养住院医师的健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Permanente journal
The Permanente journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信