Hemodynamic Collapse After Intubation in Critical Care Transport.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Kalle J Fjeld, Alyson M Esteves, Ryan J Ding, Alissa M Bates, Kayla A Fay, Matthew A Roginski
{"title":"Hemodynamic Collapse After Intubation in Critical Care Transport.","authors":"Kalle J Fjeld, Alyson M Esteves, Ryan J Ding, Alissa M Bates, Kayla A Fay, Matthew A Roginski","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2396949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to describe the incidence of and modifiable risk factors for post intubation hemodynamic collapse in prehospital and interfacility critical care transport.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single center retrospective chart review of adult patients (≥18 years) intubated by a critical care transport team between January 2017 and May 2023. The primary outcome was incidence of hemodynamic collapse (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg for greater than 30 min, new vasopressor requirement, vasopressor dose increase, fluid bolus of >15 mL/kg, systolic blood pressure <65 mmHg at least once, or cardiac arrest). Secondary outcomes included post intubation hypoxia, as well as association of hemodynamic collapse with potentially modifiable risk factors including pre intubation shock index, pre intubation heart rate, pre intubation systolic blood pressure, and induction agent.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred and thirty-three patients were included. Ninety-seven (29.1%) patients experienced hemodynamic collapse and 36 (10.8%) of patients experienced life threatening hemodynamic collapse. Pre intubation shock index >1 (OR 3.18, 95% CI 1.15-8.74) was associated with post intubation hemodynamic collapse. Choice of induction agent, fluid bolus prior to intubation, location of intubation, presence of traumatic injury, and age were not correlated with risk of hemodynamic collapse. The number of intubation attempts and methods of intubation were similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hemodynamic collapse and life-threatening hemodynamic collapse after intubation occurred frequently in this critical care transport cohort. Shock index greater than one was associated with significantly higher risk of hemodynamic collapse and life-threatening hemodynamic collapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2396949","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe the incidence of and modifiable risk factors for post intubation hemodynamic collapse in prehospital and interfacility critical care transport.

Methods: Single center retrospective chart review of adult patients (≥18 years) intubated by a critical care transport team between January 2017 and May 2023. The primary outcome was incidence of hemodynamic collapse (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg for greater than 30 min, new vasopressor requirement, vasopressor dose increase, fluid bolus of >15 mL/kg, systolic blood pressure <65 mmHg at least once, or cardiac arrest). Secondary outcomes included post intubation hypoxia, as well as association of hemodynamic collapse with potentially modifiable risk factors including pre intubation shock index, pre intubation heart rate, pre intubation systolic blood pressure, and induction agent.

Results: Three hundred and thirty-three patients were included. Ninety-seven (29.1%) patients experienced hemodynamic collapse and 36 (10.8%) of patients experienced life threatening hemodynamic collapse. Pre intubation shock index >1 (OR 3.18, 95% CI 1.15-8.74) was associated with post intubation hemodynamic collapse. Choice of induction agent, fluid bolus prior to intubation, location of intubation, presence of traumatic injury, and age were not correlated with risk of hemodynamic collapse. The number of intubation attempts and methods of intubation were similar between groups.

Conclusions: Hemodynamic collapse and life-threatening hemodynamic collapse after intubation occurred frequently in this critical care transport cohort. Shock index greater than one was associated with significantly higher risk of hemodynamic collapse and life-threatening hemodynamic collapse.

重症监护转运过程中插管后的血流动力学衰竭。
研究目的本研究旨在描述院前和医院间危重症转运中插管后血流动力学衰竭的发生率和可改变的风险因素:对2017年1月至2023年5月期间由重症监护转运团队插管的成年患者(≥18岁)进行单中心回顾性病历审查。主要结果是血流动力学衰竭的发生率(收缩压<90 mmHg超过30分钟、新的血管加压剂需求、血管加压剂剂量增加、液体栓剂>15 mL/kg、收缩压<65 mmHg至少一次或心脏骤停)。次要结果包括插管后缺氧,以及血液动力学衰竭与插管前休克指数、插管前心率、插管前收缩压和诱导剂等潜在可调节风险因素的关联:共纳入 333 名患者。97名患者(29.1%)出现了血流动力学衰竭,36名患者(10.8%)出现了危及生命的血流动力学衰竭。插管前休克指数大于 1(OR 3.18,95% CI 1.15-8.74)与插管后血流动力学衰竭有关。诱导剂的选择、插管前液栓、插管位置、是否有外伤以及年龄与血流动力学衰竭的风险无关。各组间的插管尝试次数和插管方法相似:结论:插管后血流动力学衰竭和危及生命的血流动力学衰竭经常发生在重症监护转运队列中。休克指数大于 1 的患者发生血流动力学衰竭和危及生命的血流动力学衰竭的风险明显更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信