Patellar bone defect grafting does not reduce anterior knee pain after bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Lucas Martorell-de Fortuny, Raul Torres-Claramunt, Juan Francisco Sánchez-Soler, Simone Perelli, P Hinarejos, Joan Carles Monllau
{"title":"Patellar bone defect grafting does not reduce anterior knee pain after bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.","authors":"Lucas Martorell-de Fortuny, Raul Torres-Claramunt, Juan Francisco Sánchez-Soler, Simone Perelli, P Hinarejos, Joan Carles Monllau","doi":"10.1002/ksa.12449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Donor site morbidity is the main drawback to using bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) as a graft in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The objective of the study was to determine whether refilling the patellar bone defect after BPTB harvesting with autograft bone decreased kneeling pain to a greater degree when compared with a group in which bone defect is left unaddressed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a randomised single-blinded controlled study. Forty patients were randomised into two groups; group 1: Patellar bone defect filled with autologous bone; group 2: Bone defect left undressed. Pain was measured by means of pressure algometry (PA). Functional outcomes were measured with the Kujala and Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Patella (VISA-P) score. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was done to measure bone buildup between groups at the 1-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No differences were observed in the different algometry measurements and the scores were assessed at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The ratio of void filled remained consistently higher (p = 0.003) in group 1 when compared to group 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although refilling the lower pole of the patella with autologous bone from the harvested BPTB autograft loads the bone defect, it does not reduce pain at the donor site 1 year after surgery.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic study level 1.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12449","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Donor site morbidity is the main drawback to using bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) as a graft in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The objective of the study was to determine whether refilling the patellar bone defect after BPTB harvesting with autograft bone decreased kneeling pain to a greater degree when compared with a group in which bone defect is left unaddressed.

Methods: This is a randomised single-blinded controlled study. Forty patients were randomised into two groups; group 1: Patellar bone defect filled with autologous bone; group 2: Bone defect left undressed. Pain was measured by means of pressure algometry (PA). Functional outcomes were measured with the Kujala and Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Patella (VISA-P) score. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was done to measure bone buildup between groups at the 1-year follow-up.

Results: No differences were observed in the different algometry measurements and the scores were assessed at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The ratio of void filled remained consistently higher (p = 0.003) in group 1 when compared to group 2.

Conclusions: Although refilling the lower pole of the patella with autologous bone from the harvested BPTB autograft loads the bone defect, it does not reduce pain at the donor site 1 year after surgery.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic study level 1.

髌骨缺损移植并不能减轻骨-髌腱-骨前交叉韧带重建术后的膝关节前部疼痛。
目的:在前交叉韧带(ACL)重建中使用骨-髌腱-骨(BPTB)作为移植物的主要缺点是供体部位发病率高。本研究的目的是确定,与未处理骨缺损的组别相比,在取骨-髌腱-骨后用自体移植骨重新填充髌骨缺损是否能在更大程度上减轻跪地疼痛:这是一项随机单盲对照研究。40 名患者被随机分为两组:第 1 组:用自体骨填充髌骨缺损;第 2 组:不处理骨缺损。疼痛通过压痛计(PA)测量。功能结果采用 Kujala 和维多利亚体育研究所的髌骨评估(VISA-P)评分进行测量。磁共振成像(MRI)用于测量1年随访时各组间的骨质堆积情况:结果:术后 3 个月、6 个月和 12 个月对不同的骨密度测量和评分进行了评估,未发现差异。与第二组相比,第一组的空隙填充率始终较高(p = 0.003):结论:虽然用采集的 BPTB 自体移植物中的自体骨填充髌骨下端可以加载骨缺损,但并不能减轻术后 1 年供体部位的疼痛:1级治疗研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信