A novel positive end-expiratory pressure titration using electrical impedance tomography in spontaneously breathing acute respiratory distress syndrome patients on mechanical ventilation: an observational study from the MaastrICCht cohort.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
S J H Heines, S A M de Jongh, F H C de Jongh, R P J Segers, K M H Gilissen, I C C van der Horst, B C T van Bussel, D C J J Bergmans
{"title":"A novel positive end-expiratory pressure titration using electrical impedance tomography in spontaneously breathing acute respiratory distress syndrome patients on mechanical ventilation: an observational study from the MaastrICCht cohort.","authors":"S J H Heines, S A M de Jongh, F H C de Jongh, R P J Segers, K M H Gilissen, I C C van der Horst, B C T van Bussel, D C J J Bergmans","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01212-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is no universally accepted method for positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration approach for patients on spontaneous mechanical ventilation (SMV). Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) guided PEEP-titration has shown promising results in controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV), current implemented algorithm for PEEP titration (based on regional compliance measurements) is not applicable in SMV. Regional peak flow (RPF, defined as the highest inspiratory flow rate based on EIT at a certain PEEP level) is a new method for quantifying regional lung mechanics designed for SMV. The objective is to study whether RPF by EIT is a feasible method for PEEP titration during SMV. Single EIT measurements were performed in COVID-19 ARDS patients on SMV. Clinical (i.e., tidal volume, airway occlusion pressure, end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub>) and mechanical (cyclic alveolar recruitment, recruitment, cumulative overdistension (OD), cumulative collapse (CL), pendelluft, and PEEP) outcomes were determined by EIT at several pre-defined PEEP thresholds (1-10% CL and the intersection of the OD and CL curves) and outcomes at all thresholds were compared to the outcomes at baseline PEEP. In total, 25 patients were included. No significant and clinically relevant differences were found between thresholds for tidal volume, end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub>, and P0.1 compared to baseline PEEP; cyclic alveolar recruitment rates changed by -3.9% to -37.9% across thresholds; recruitment rates ranged from - 49.4% to + 79.2%; cumulative overdistension changed from - 75.9% to + 373.4% across thresholds; cumulative collapse changed from 0% to -94.3%; PEEP levels from 10 up to 14 cmH<sub>2</sub>O were observed across thresholds compared to baseline PEEP of 10 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. A threshold of approximately 5% cumulative collapse yields the optimum compromise between all clinical and mechanical outcomes. EIT-guided PEEP titration by the RPF approach is feasible and is linked to improved overall lung mechanics) during SMV using a threshold of approximately 5% CL. However, the long-term clinical safety and effect of this approach remain to be determined.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01212-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is no universally accepted method for positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration approach for patients on spontaneous mechanical ventilation (SMV). Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) guided PEEP-titration has shown promising results in controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV), current implemented algorithm for PEEP titration (based on regional compliance measurements) is not applicable in SMV. Regional peak flow (RPF, defined as the highest inspiratory flow rate based on EIT at a certain PEEP level) is a new method for quantifying regional lung mechanics designed for SMV. The objective is to study whether RPF by EIT is a feasible method for PEEP titration during SMV. Single EIT measurements were performed in COVID-19 ARDS patients on SMV. Clinical (i.e., tidal volume, airway occlusion pressure, end-tidal CO2) and mechanical (cyclic alveolar recruitment, recruitment, cumulative overdistension (OD), cumulative collapse (CL), pendelluft, and PEEP) outcomes were determined by EIT at several pre-defined PEEP thresholds (1-10% CL and the intersection of the OD and CL curves) and outcomes at all thresholds were compared to the outcomes at baseline PEEP. In total, 25 patients were included. No significant and clinically relevant differences were found between thresholds for tidal volume, end-tidal CO2, and P0.1 compared to baseline PEEP; cyclic alveolar recruitment rates changed by -3.9% to -37.9% across thresholds; recruitment rates ranged from - 49.4% to + 79.2%; cumulative overdistension changed from - 75.9% to + 373.4% across thresholds; cumulative collapse changed from 0% to -94.3%; PEEP levels from 10 up to 14 cmH2O were observed across thresholds compared to baseline PEEP of 10 cmH2O. A threshold of approximately 5% cumulative collapse yields the optimum compromise between all clinical and mechanical outcomes. EIT-guided PEEP titration by the RPF approach is feasible and is linked to improved overall lung mechanics) during SMV using a threshold of approximately 5% CL. However, the long-term clinical safety and effect of this approach remain to be determined.

Abstract Image

在使用机械通气的自主呼吸急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者中使用电阻抗断层扫描进行新型呼气末正压滴定:一项来自 MaastrICCht 队列的观察性研究。
自发性机械通气(SMV)患者的呼气末正压(PEEP)滴定方法尚未得到普遍认可。电阻抗断层扫描(EIT)引导的呼气末正压(PEEP)滴定在控制性机械通气(CMV)中显示出良好的效果,但目前实施的呼气末正压滴定算法(基于区域顺应性测量)不适用于自发性机械通气。区域峰值流速(RPF,定义为在一定 PEEP 水平下基于 EIT 的最高吸气流速)是一种用于量化区域肺力学的新方法,专为 SMV 而设计。目的是研究通过 EIT 测量 RPF 是否是 SMV 期间 PEEP 滴定的可行方法。对接受 SMV 的 COVID-19 ARDS 患者进行了单次 EIT 测量。临床(即潮气量、气道闭塞压、潮气末 CO2)和机械(周期性肺泡募集、募集、累积过度张力 (OD)、累积塌陷 (CL)、垂尾和 PEEP)结果均在几个预先定义的 PEEP 阈值(1-10% CL 以及 OD 和 CL 曲线的交叉点)下通过 EIT 确定,并将所有阈值下的结果与基线 PEEP 下的结果进行比较。总共纳入了 25 名患者。与基线 PEEP 相比,潮气量、潮气末 CO2 和 P0.1 的阈值之间没有发现明显的临床相关性差异;不同阈值下的肺泡周期性募集率变化为 -3.9% 至 -37.9%;募集率范围为 -49.4% 到 +79.2%;各阈值的累积过度张力从 -75.9% 到 +373.4%;累积塌陷从 0% 到 -94.3%;与基线 PEEP 10 cmH2O 相比,各阈值的 PEEP 水平从 10 到 14 cmH2O 不等。累积塌陷度约为 5% 的阈值是所有临床和机械结果之间的最佳折衷。采用 RPF 方法在 EIT 指导下滴定 PEEP 是可行的,并且与 SMV 期间使用约 5% CL 的阈值改善整体肺力学有关)。然而,这种方法的长期临床安全性和效果仍有待确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信