The effect of pain neuroscience education on chronic postsurgical pain after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Dominique C Baas, Johanna C Van Aalderen-Wichers, Tjeerd H Van der Goot, Ronald J Verhagen
{"title":"The effect of pain neuroscience education on chronic postsurgical pain after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Dominique C Baas, Johanna C Van Aalderen-Wichers, Tjeerd H Van der Goot, Ronald J Verhagen","doi":"10.2340/17453674.2024.41346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong> Chronic postsurgical pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is frequent and may be reduced by pain neuroscience education (PNE), teaching people about pain from a neurobiological perspective. This study investigated primarily the effectiveness of 2 individual sessions of PNE versus usual care on pain levels 3 months postoperatively in patients undergoing TKA. Secondary outcomes were physical functioning, stiffness, health-related quality of life, pain catastrophizing, attention to pain, and levels of anxiety and depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A prospective single-center, parallel-group randomized controlled trial was undertaken including patients aged 18 years or older scheduled for primary TKA. 68 patients were randomly assigned to PNE or usual care. The primary outcome was the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score 3 months postoperatively. Outcomes were measured preoperatively, at 2 weeks (acute phase), and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> We found no statistically significant difference (0.4 points; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.7 to 2.4) in WOMAC pain scores 3 months after TKA between the PNE and control group. We found a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups for attention to pain at 3 months in favor of PNE (P = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> This RCT showed that PNE was not superior to usual care in terms of reducing pain at 3 months after TKA. Attention to pain, as a secondary outcome, was significantly lower in the PNE group compared with usual care. Other secondary outcome measures showed no significant differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":6916,"journal":{"name":"Acta Orthopaedica","volume":"95 ","pages":"485-491"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11350964/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Orthopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.41346","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose:  Chronic postsurgical pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is frequent and may be reduced by pain neuroscience education (PNE), teaching people about pain from a neurobiological perspective. This study investigated primarily the effectiveness of 2 individual sessions of PNE versus usual care on pain levels 3 months postoperatively in patients undergoing TKA. Secondary outcomes were physical functioning, stiffness, health-related quality of life, pain catastrophizing, attention to pain, and levels of anxiety and depression.

Methods:  A prospective single-center, parallel-group randomized controlled trial was undertaken including patients aged 18 years or older scheduled for primary TKA. 68 patients were randomly assigned to PNE or usual care. The primary outcome was the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score 3 months postoperatively. Outcomes were measured preoperatively, at 2 weeks (acute phase), and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively.

Results:  We found no statistically significant difference (0.4 points; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.7 to 2.4) in WOMAC pain scores 3 months after TKA between the PNE and control group. We found a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups for attention to pain at 3 months in favor of PNE (P = 0.02).

Conclusion:  This RCT showed that PNE was not superior to usual care in terms of reducing pain at 3 months after TKA. Attention to pain, as a secondary outcome, was significantly lower in the PNE group compared with usual care. Other secondary outcome measures showed no significant differences.

疼痛神经科学教育对全膝关节置换术后慢性术后疼痛的影响:随机对照试验。
背景和目的:全膝关节置换术(TKA)后的慢性术后疼痛很常见,疼痛神经科学教育(PNE)可以减轻这种疼痛,它从神经生物学的角度向人们传授有关疼痛的知识。本研究主要调查了接受全膝关节置换术的患者术后 3 个月内接受 2 次疼痛神经科学教育与常规护理对疼痛水平的影响。次要结果包括身体功能、僵硬度、健康相关生活质量、疼痛灾难化、对疼痛的关注以及焦虑和抑郁水平: 方法:进行了一项前瞻性的单中心平行组随机对照试验,包括年龄在 18 岁或 18 岁以上、计划接受初级 TKA 的患者。68 名患者被随机分配到 PNE 或常规护理中。主要结果是术后 3 个月的西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)疼痛评分。结果分别在术前、术后 2 周(急性期)、术后 3 个月和 12 个月进行测量: 结果:我们发现,PNE 组与对照组在 TKA 术后 3 个月的 WOMAC 疼痛评分上没有明显的统计学差异(0.4 分;95% 置信区间 [CI] -1.7 至 2.4)。我们发现,在3个月时,两组患者对疼痛的关注度差异有统计学意义(P = 0.02): 这项研究结果表明,在减少 TKA 术后 3 个月的疼痛方面,PNE 并不优于常规护理。作为次要结果,PNE组对疼痛的关注度明显低于常规护理组。其他次要结果显示无明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Orthopaedica
Acta Orthopaedica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
105
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Orthopaedica (previously Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica) presents original articles of basic research interest, as well as clinical studies in the field of orthopedics and related sub disciplines. Ever since the journal was founded in 1930, by a group of Scandinavian orthopedic surgeons, the journal has been published for an international audience. Acta Orthopaedica is owned by the Nordic Orthopaedic Federation and is the official publication of this federation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信