Antibiotic stewardship with multiplex PCR for pneumonia in intensive care patients: A retrospective study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1111/aas.14516
Sine Wichmann, Dorthe Ørsnes Christensen, Claus Antonio Juel Jensen, Jette Bangsborg, Mette Kolpen, Morten Heiberg Bestle
{"title":"Antibiotic stewardship with multiplex PCR for pneumonia in intensive care patients: A retrospective study.","authors":"Sine Wichmann, Dorthe Ørsnes Christensen, Claus Antonio Juel Jensen, Jette Bangsborg, Mette Kolpen, Morten Heiberg Bestle","doi":"10.1111/aas.14516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early initiation of targeted antibiotic therapy is important to achieve the best patient outcomes in intubated patients with pneumonia in the intensive care unit (ICU). This study aimed to investigate the applicability of multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in an ICU by comparing the test results to the results of conventional microbiological methods to assess the possible impact on antibiotic therapy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This retrospective study investigated adult patients with pneumonia on mechanical ventilation in the ICU. Tracheal aspirates were collected within 24h after intubation and the initiation of mechanical ventilation. Samples were initially tested by conventional microbiological methods and subsequently re-evaluated with rapid multiplex PCR on stored samples. Concordance between the two methods was assessed. An intensivist and a microbiologist retrospectively reviewed the patients' electronic health records for relevant clinical details to evaluate the potential impact of multiplex PCR results on antibiotic therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 76 patients were enrolled and 55 (72.4%) tested positive for 95 pathogens using multiplex PCR, while conventional microbiological methods identified 40 pathogens in 32 (42.2%) patients. Concordance between the two methods was observed in 42 (55.3%) patients. Multiplex PCR detected 39 additional pathogens in 31 (40.7%) patients. Retrospective analysis indicated potential antibiotic de-escalation in 35 (46.1%) patients and escalation in 4 (5.3%) patients. Multiplex PCR significantly reduced the turnaround time for test results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In ICU patients with suspected pneumonia, multiplex PCR identified a higher number of pathogens compared to CMM. A retrospective assessment indicates that the use of multiplex PCR could potentially have prompted the de-escalation of antibiotic therapy in nearly half of the patients. Therefore, multiplex PCR may serve as a supplement to CMM in guiding antibiotic stewardship.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":"1456-1462"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14516","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early initiation of targeted antibiotic therapy is important to achieve the best patient outcomes in intubated patients with pneumonia in the intensive care unit (ICU). This study aimed to investigate the applicability of multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in an ICU by comparing the test results to the results of conventional microbiological methods to assess the possible impact on antibiotic therapy.

Method: This retrospective study investigated adult patients with pneumonia on mechanical ventilation in the ICU. Tracheal aspirates were collected within 24h after intubation and the initiation of mechanical ventilation. Samples were initially tested by conventional microbiological methods and subsequently re-evaluated with rapid multiplex PCR on stored samples. Concordance between the two methods was assessed. An intensivist and a microbiologist retrospectively reviewed the patients' electronic health records for relevant clinical details to evaluate the potential impact of multiplex PCR results on antibiotic therapy.

Results: In this study, 76 patients were enrolled and 55 (72.4%) tested positive for 95 pathogens using multiplex PCR, while conventional microbiological methods identified 40 pathogens in 32 (42.2%) patients. Concordance between the two methods was observed in 42 (55.3%) patients. Multiplex PCR detected 39 additional pathogens in 31 (40.7%) patients. Retrospective analysis indicated potential antibiotic de-escalation in 35 (46.1%) patients and escalation in 4 (5.3%) patients. Multiplex PCR significantly reduced the turnaround time for test results.

Conclusion: In ICU patients with suspected pneumonia, multiplex PCR identified a higher number of pathogens compared to CMM. A retrospective assessment indicates that the use of multiplex PCR could potentially have prompted the de-escalation of antibiotic therapy in nearly half of the patients. Therefore, multiplex PCR may serve as a supplement to CMM in guiding antibiotic stewardship.

利用多重 PCR 对重症监护患者肺炎进行抗生素管理:回顾性研究。
背景:对于重症监护病房(ICU)中的插管肺炎患者来说,尽早开始有针对性的抗生素治疗对于获得最佳疗效非常重要。本研究旨在调查多重聚合酶链反应(PCR)在重症监护病房的适用性,将检测结果与传统微生物学方法的结果进行比较,以评估其对抗生素治疗可能产生的影响:这项回顾性研究调查了在重症监护室接受机械通气的成人肺炎患者。在插管和开始机械通气后的 24 小时内采集气管吸出物。首先用传统微生物学方法对样本进行检测,然后用快速多重 PCR 对保存的样本进行重新评估。对两种方法的一致性进行了评估。一名重症监护医生和一名微生物学家回顾性查看了患者的电子病历,了解相关临床细节,以评估多重 PCR 结果对抗生素治疗的潜在影响:本研究共收录了 76 名患者,其中 55 人(72.4%)使用多重 PCR 检测出 95 种病原体呈阳性,而 32 人(42.2%)使用传统微生物学方法检测出 40 种病原体。有 42 名患者(55.3%)的两种方法检测结果一致。多重 PCR 在 31 例(40.7%)患者中又检测出 39 种病原体。回顾性分析表明,35 例(46.1%)患者可能需要降低抗生素使用剂量,4 例(5.3%)患者需要增加抗生素使用剂量。多重 PCR 大幅缩短了检测结果的周转时间:结论:在 ICU 疑似肺炎患者中,多重 PCR 与 CMM 相比能识别出更多的病原体。回顾性评估表明,使用多重 PCR 有可能促使近一半患者放弃抗生素治疗。因此,在指导抗生素管理方面,多重 PCR 可作为 CMM 的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信