Unveiling the Impact and Diverse Contributions of Champions in Community Initiatives for Elderly Individuals with Chronic Conditions: An In-Depth Examination through a Scoping Review

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kristina M. Kokorelias, Annabel Hayes, Guillaume Lim Fat, Reham Abdelhalim, Hardeep Singh, Marianne Saragosa, Christine L. Sheppard
{"title":"Unveiling the Impact and Diverse Contributions of Champions in Community Initiatives for Elderly Individuals with Chronic Conditions: An In-Depth Examination through a Scoping Review","authors":"Kristina M. Kokorelias,&nbsp;Annabel Hayes,&nbsp;Guillaume Lim Fat,&nbsp;Reham Abdelhalim,&nbsp;Hardeep Singh,&nbsp;Marianne Saragosa,&nbsp;Christine L. Sheppard","doi":"10.1155/2024/5025234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>In response to the global rise in chronic diseases among aging populations, healthcare systems are transitioning from acute care models to community-based interventions tailored to the diverse needs of older adults. This study aimed to explore the role of champions in implementing community-based interventions for older adults with chronic conditions to address the gap in understanding the specific functions and impact of champions in these contexts. A scoping review methodology used a six-stage process aligned with the Arksey and O’Malley framework. After searching across 8 databases, a total of 10 studies met all inclusion criteria. The included studies were predominantly from the United States (<i>n</i> = 6/10, 60%) and the United Kingdom (<i>n</i> = 2/10, 20%). Most studies employed quantitative methodologies (<i>n</i> = 6/10, 60%), describing and evaluating healthcare champion programs or investigating the quality of care for older adults. Community interventions targeted various chronic conditions (e.g., dementia) and health outcomes (e.g., medication reconciliation). Champions, ranging from 17 to 106 individuals, played diverse roles as professional healthcare providers or lay volunteers. They facilitated intervention delivery, advocated for change, participated in evaluation, and fostered collaboration within multidisciplinary teams, contributing significantly to program implementation and health information dissemination. Recognizing champions’ diverse roles, researchers and practitioners can tailor interventions to leverage their strengths and maximize their impact. Additionally, the review highlights the importance of clear definitions and operationalization of champions to ensure consistency across studies and interventions. Practitioners can use this knowledge to identify, train effectively, and support champions within their communities, ultimately enhancing the sustainability and success of interventions for older adults with chronic conditions.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48195,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Care in the Community","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/5025234","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Care in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/5025234","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In response to the global rise in chronic diseases among aging populations, healthcare systems are transitioning from acute care models to community-based interventions tailored to the diverse needs of older adults. This study aimed to explore the role of champions in implementing community-based interventions for older adults with chronic conditions to address the gap in understanding the specific functions and impact of champions in these contexts. A scoping review methodology used a six-stage process aligned with the Arksey and O’Malley framework. After searching across 8 databases, a total of 10 studies met all inclusion criteria. The included studies were predominantly from the United States (n = 6/10, 60%) and the United Kingdom (n = 2/10, 20%). Most studies employed quantitative methodologies (n = 6/10, 60%), describing and evaluating healthcare champion programs or investigating the quality of care for older adults. Community interventions targeted various chronic conditions (e.g., dementia) and health outcomes (e.g., medication reconciliation). Champions, ranging from 17 to 106 individuals, played diverse roles as professional healthcare providers or lay volunteers. They facilitated intervention delivery, advocated for change, participated in evaluation, and fostered collaboration within multidisciplinary teams, contributing significantly to program implementation and health information dissemination. Recognizing champions’ diverse roles, researchers and practitioners can tailor interventions to leverage their strengths and maximize their impact. Additionally, the review highlights the importance of clear definitions and operationalization of champions to ensure consistency across studies and interventions. Practitioners can use this knowledge to identify, train effectively, and support champions within their communities, ultimately enhancing the sustainability and success of interventions for older adults with chronic conditions.

Abstract Image

揭示冠军在社区倡议中对慢性病老年人的影响和不同贡献:通过范围界定审查进行深入研究
为应对全球老龄人口中慢性疾病的增加,医疗保健系统正在从急症护理模式过渡到针对老年人不同需求的社区干预措施。本研究旨在探讨支持者在为患有慢性疾病的老年人实施社区干预措施中的作用,以弥补在了解支持者在这些情况下的具体功能和影响方面的不足。研究采用了与 Arksey 和 O'Malley 框架相一致的六阶段范围审查方法。在对 8 个数据库进行搜索后,共有 10 项研究符合所有纳入标准。纳入的研究主要来自美国(n = 6/10,60%)和英国(n = 2/10,20%)。大多数研究采用定量方法(n = 6/10,60%),描述和评估医疗保健冠军计划或调查老年人护理质量。社区干预措施针对各种慢性病(如痴呆症)和健康结果(如药物调节)。保健卫士人数从 17 人到 106 人不等,他们作为专业医疗服务提供者或非专业志愿者扮演着不同的角色。他们为干预措施的实施提供便利,倡导变革,参与评估,促进多学科团队的合作,为计划的实施和健康信息的传播做出了重要贡献。认识到倡导者的不同作用,研究人员和从业人员可以调整干预措施,充分利用他们的优势,最大限度地发挥他们的影响。此外,综述还强调了明确定义和操作冠军的重要性,以确保各项研究和干预措施的一致性。从业人员可以利用这些知识来识别、有效培训和支持社区中的拥护者,最终提高针对患有慢性病的老年人的干预措施的可持续性和成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: Health and Social Care in the community is an essential journal for anyone involved in nursing, social work, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, general practice, health psychology, health economy, primary health care and the promotion of health. It is an international peer-reviewed journal supporting interdisciplinary collaboration on policy and practice within health and social care in the community. The journal publishes: - Original research papers in all areas of health and social care - Topical health and social care review articles - Policy and practice evaluations - Book reviews - Special issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信