Wearable devices for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A population survey on the willingness to adhere

IF 1.6 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Saud Lingawi MEng, Jacob Hutton MSc, Mahsa Khalili PhD, Katie N. Dainty PhD, Brian Grunau MD, Babak Shadgan MD, PhD, Jim Christenson MD, Calvin Kuo PhD
{"title":"Wearable devices for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A population survey on the willingness to adhere","authors":"Saud Lingawi MEng,&nbsp;Jacob Hutton MSc,&nbsp;Mahsa Khalili PhD,&nbsp;Katie N. Dainty PhD,&nbsp;Brian Grunau MD,&nbsp;Babak Shadgan MD, PhD,&nbsp;Jim Christenson MD,&nbsp;Calvin Kuo PhD","doi":"10.1002/emp2.13268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>When an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) occurs, the first step in the chain of survival is detection. However, 75% of OHCAs are unwitnessed, representing the largest barrier to activating the chain of survival. Wearable devices have the potential to be “artificial bystanders,” detecting OHCA and alerting 9-1-1. We sought to understand factors impacting users’ willingness for continuous use of a wearable device through an online survey to inform future use of these systems for automated OHCA detection.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data were collected from October 2022 to June 2023 through voluntary response sampling. The survey investigated user convenience and perception of urgency to understand design preferences and willingness to adhere to continuous wearable use across different hypothetical risk levels. Associations between categorical variables and willingness were evaluated through nonparametric tests. Logistic models were fit to evaluate the association between continuous variables and willingness at different hypothetical risk levels.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The survey was completed by 359 participants. Participants preferred hand-based devices (wristbands: 87%, watches: 86%, rings: 62%) and prioritized comfort (94%), cost (83%), and size (72%). Participants were more willing to adhere at higher levels of hypothetical risk. At the baseline risk of 0.1%, older individuals with prior wearable use were most willing to adhere to continuous wearable use.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Individuals were willing to continuously wear wearable devices for OHCA detection, especially at increased hypothetical risk of OHCA. Optimizing willingness is not just a matter of adjusting for user preferences, but also increasing perception of urgency through awareness and education about OHCA.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/emp2.13268","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/emp2.13268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

When an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) occurs, the first step in the chain of survival is detection. However, 75% of OHCAs are unwitnessed, representing the largest barrier to activating the chain of survival. Wearable devices have the potential to be “artificial bystanders,” detecting OHCA and alerting 9-1-1. We sought to understand factors impacting users’ willingness for continuous use of a wearable device through an online survey to inform future use of these systems for automated OHCA detection.

Methods

Data were collected from October 2022 to June 2023 through voluntary response sampling. The survey investigated user convenience and perception of urgency to understand design preferences and willingness to adhere to continuous wearable use across different hypothetical risk levels. Associations between categorical variables and willingness were evaluated through nonparametric tests. Logistic models were fit to evaluate the association between continuous variables and willingness at different hypothetical risk levels.

Results

The survey was completed by 359 participants. Participants preferred hand-based devices (wristbands: 87%, watches: 86%, rings: 62%) and prioritized comfort (94%), cost (83%), and size (72%). Participants were more willing to adhere at higher levels of hypothetical risk. At the baseline risk of 0.1%, older individuals with prior wearable use were most willing to adhere to continuous wearable use.

Conclusion

Individuals were willing to continuously wear wearable devices for OHCA detection, especially at increased hypothetical risk of OHCA. Optimizing willingness is not just a matter of adjusting for user preferences, but also increasing perception of urgency through awareness and education about OHCA.

Abstract Image

用于院外心脏骤停的可穿戴设备:关于使用意愿的人口调查
目标 当发生院外心脏骤停(OHCA)时,生存链的第一步是发现。然而,75% 的院外心脏骤停是在无人目击的情况下发生的,这是启动生存链的最大障碍。可穿戴设备有可能成为 "人工旁观者",检测到 OHCA 并向 9-1-1 报警。我们试图通过在线调查了解影响用户持续使用可穿戴设备意愿的因素,为将来使用这些系统自动检测 OHCA 提供参考。 方法 从 2022 年 10 月到 2023 年 6 月,通过自愿响应抽样收集数据。调查对用户的便利性和紧迫感进行了调查,以了解用户的设计偏好以及在不同假设风险水平下坚持连续使用可穿戴设备的意愿。通过非参数检验评估了分类变量与意愿之间的关联。在不同的假设风险水平下,通过拟合逻辑模型来评估连续变量与意愿之间的关联。 结果 359 名参与者完成了调查。参与者首选手持设备(腕带:87%;手表:86%;戒指:62%),并优先考虑舒适度(94%)、成本(83%)和大小(72%)。在假设风险较高的情况下,参与者更愿意坚持使用。在基线风险为 0.1% 的情况下,曾经使用过可穿戴设备的老年人最愿意坚持连续使用可穿戴设备。 结论 受试者愿意持续佩戴可穿戴设备进行 OHCA 检测,尤其是在 OHCA 假设风险增加的情况下。优化意愿不仅仅是调整用户偏好的问题,还需要通过提高对 OHCA 的认识和教育来增强紧迫感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信