Advanced therapy with mesenchymal stromal cells for knee osteoarthritis: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

IF 5.9 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Caio Gomes Tabet , Rafael Leite Pacheco , Ana Luiza Cabrera Martimbianco , Rachel Riera , Arnaldo José Hernandez , Daniela Franco Bueno , Tiago Lazzaretti Fernandes
{"title":"Advanced therapy with mesenchymal stromal cells for knee osteoarthritis: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Caio Gomes Tabet ,&nbsp;Rafael Leite Pacheco ,&nbsp;Ana Luiza Cabrera Martimbianco ,&nbsp;Rachel Riera ,&nbsp;Arnaldo José Hernandez ,&nbsp;Daniela Franco Bueno ,&nbsp;Tiago Lazzaretti Fernandes","doi":"10.1016/j.jot.2024.07.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Advanced cell therapies emerged as promising candidates for treatment of knee articular diseases, but robust evidence regarding their clinical applicability is still lacking.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the efficacy and safety of advanced mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) therapy for knee osteoarthritis (OA) and chondral lesions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Systematic review of randomized controlled trials conducted in accordance with Cochrane Handbook and reported following PRISMA checklist. GRADE approach was used for assessing the evidence certainty.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>25 randomized controlled trials that enrolled 1048 participants were included. Meta-analyses data showed that, compared to viscosupplementation (VS), advanced MSC therapy resulted in a 1.91 lower pain VAS score (95 % CI ‐3.23 to −0.59; p &lt; 0.00001) for the treatment of knee OA after 12 months. Compared to placebo, the difference was 0.99 lower pain VAS points (95 % CI ‐1.94 to −0.03; p = 0.76). According to the GRADE approach, the evidence was very uncertain for both comparisons. By excluding studies with high risk of bias, there was a similar size of effect (VAS MD ‐1.54, 95 % CI ‐2.09 to −0.98; p = 0.70) with improved (moderate) certainty of evidence, suggesting that MSC therapy probably reduces pain slightly better than VS. Regarding serious adverse events, there was no difference from advanced MSC therapy to placebo or to VS, with very uncertain evidence.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Advanced MSC therapy resulted in lower pain compared to placebo or VS for the treatment of knee OA after 12 months, with no difference in adverse events. However, the evidence was considered uncertain.</p></div><div><h3>The Translational Potential of this Article</h3><p>Currently, there is a lack of studies with good methodological structure aiming to evaluate the real clinical impact of advanced cell therapy for knee OA. The present study was well structured and conducted, with Risk of Bias, GRADE certainty assessment and sensitivity analysis. It explores the translational aspect of the benefits and safety of MSC compared with placebo and gold-standard therapy to give practitioners and researchers support to expand this therapy in their practice.</p></div><div><h3>PROSPERO registration number</h3><p>CRD42020158173. Access at <span><span>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=158173</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Translation","volume":"48 ","pages":"Pages 176-189"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214031X2400086X/pdfft?md5=476887109501e205d05ab6ce9e40b89f&pid=1-s2.0-S2214031X2400086X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Translation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214031X2400086X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Advanced cell therapies emerged as promising candidates for treatment of knee articular diseases, but robust evidence regarding their clinical applicability is still lacking.

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of advanced mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) therapy for knee osteoarthritis (OA) and chondral lesions.

Methods

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials conducted in accordance with Cochrane Handbook and reported following PRISMA checklist. GRADE approach was used for assessing the evidence certainty.

Results

25 randomized controlled trials that enrolled 1048 participants were included. Meta-analyses data showed that, compared to viscosupplementation (VS), advanced MSC therapy resulted in a 1.91 lower pain VAS score (95 % CI ‐3.23 to −0.59; p < 0.00001) for the treatment of knee OA after 12 months. Compared to placebo, the difference was 0.99 lower pain VAS points (95 % CI ‐1.94 to −0.03; p = 0.76). According to the GRADE approach, the evidence was very uncertain for both comparisons. By excluding studies with high risk of bias, there was a similar size of effect (VAS MD ‐1.54, 95 % CI ‐2.09 to −0.98; p = 0.70) with improved (moderate) certainty of evidence, suggesting that MSC therapy probably reduces pain slightly better than VS. Regarding serious adverse events, there was no difference from advanced MSC therapy to placebo or to VS, with very uncertain evidence.

Conclusion

Advanced MSC therapy resulted in lower pain compared to placebo or VS for the treatment of knee OA after 12 months, with no difference in adverse events. However, the evidence was considered uncertain.

The Translational Potential of this Article

Currently, there is a lack of studies with good methodological structure aiming to evaluate the real clinical impact of advanced cell therapy for knee OA. The present study was well structured and conducted, with Risk of Bias, GRADE certainty assessment and sensitivity analysis. It explores the translational aspect of the benefits and safety of MSC compared with placebo and gold-standard therapy to give practitioners and researchers support to expand this therapy in their practice.

PROSPERO registration number

CRD42020158173. Access at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=158173.

Abstract Image

间充质基质细胞治疗膝骨关节炎的先进疗法:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景 先进的细胞疗法成为治疗膝关节疾病的有前途的候选疗法,但仍缺乏有关其临床适用性的有力证据。目的 评估先进间充质干细胞(MSC)疗法治疗膝关节骨关节炎(OA)和软骨损伤的有效性和安全性。方法 根据《Cochrane手册》对随机对照试验进行系统综述,并按照PRISMA清单进行报告。结果纳入了 25 项随机对照试验,共 1048 人参与。元分析数据显示,与粘液补充剂(VS)相比,高级间充质干细胞疗法治疗膝关节 OA 12 个月后,疼痛 VAS 评分降低了 1.91(95 % CI -3.23 至 -0.59;p <0.00001)。与安慰剂相比,疼痛VAS评分降低了0.99分(95 % CI -1.94至-0.03;p = 0.76)。根据 GRADE 方法,这两项比较的证据都很不确定。排除偏倚风险较高的研究后,效果大小相似(VAS MD -1.54, 95 % CI -2.09 to -0.98;p = 0.70),证据确定性有所提高(中度),表明间充质干细胞疗法减轻疼痛的效果可能略优于VS。在严重不良事件方面,高级间充质干细胞疗法与安慰剂或VS相比没有差异,证据非常不确定。结论在治疗膝关节OA 12个月后,高级间充质干细胞疗法与安慰剂或VS相比可降低疼痛,在不良事件方面没有差异。本文的转化潜力目前,还缺乏具有良好方法学结构的研究来评估高级细胞疗法对膝关节OA的真正临床影响。本研究结构严谨、方法得当,并进行了偏倚风险、GRADE确定性评估和敏感性分析。它从转化的角度探讨了间充质干细胞与安慰剂和黄金标准疗法相比的益处和安全性,为从业人员和研究人员在实践中推广这种疗法提供了支持。PROSPERO注册号为CRD42020158173。请访问 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=158173。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Translation
Journal of Orthopaedic Translation Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
13.60%
发文量
91
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Translation (JOT) is the official peer-reviewed, open access journal of the Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society (CSOS) and the International Chinese Musculoskeletal Research Society (ICMRS). It is published quarterly, in January, April, July and October, by Elsevier.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信