Effects of injector spacing and momentum flux ratio on combustion instability in a model chamber with gas-centered swirl coaxial injectors

IF 5 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE
{"title":"Effects of injector spacing and momentum flux ratio on combustion instability in a model chamber with gas-centered swirl coaxial injectors","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ast.2024.109503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the effects of injector spacing and momentum flux ratio on combustion instability in a model chamber with single and two injectors, both experimentally and numerically. For the experiments, injectors similar to those used in actual rocket engines were installed in a laboratory-constructed model chamber. Numerical simulations were conducted using ANSYS Fluent, employing a detailed combustion model to complement the experimental data. Flow conditions were categorized as fuel-lean and fuel-rich based on the fuel mass flow rate. The injector spacing varied from 15 to 45 mm, and the momentum flux ratio was adjusted from 6.4 to 139.8 by manipulating the fuel and oxidizer flow rates. Both experimental and numerical results consistently revealed distinct trends in combustion instability for lean and rich conditions, influenced by injector spacing and momentum flux ratio. Combustion stabilization was consistently more effective under fuel-rich conditions. Increasing the momentum flux ratio intensified combustion instability regardless of the fuel condition. For fuel-lean conditions, a rapid transition in combustion stability was observed, with the specific transition point varying depending on the injector spacing. Considering the trade-off between instability and injector number density, a spacing of 30 mm between injectors is recommended. Additionally, for both single and two injectors with various spacings under both lean and rich conditions, combustion stability was generally better when the momentum flux ratio was less than 48.8. These findings provide valuable insights into the control and management of combustion instability, aiding in the design of rocket engine combustors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50955,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1270963824006345","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of injector spacing and momentum flux ratio on combustion instability in a model chamber with single and two injectors, both experimentally and numerically. For the experiments, injectors similar to those used in actual rocket engines were installed in a laboratory-constructed model chamber. Numerical simulations were conducted using ANSYS Fluent, employing a detailed combustion model to complement the experimental data. Flow conditions were categorized as fuel-lean and fuel-rich based on the fuel mass flow rate. The injector spacing varied from 15 to 45 mm, and the momentum flux ratio was adjusted from 6.4 to 139.8 by manipulating the fuel and oxidizer flow rates. Both experimental and numerical results consistently revealed distinct trends in combustion instability for lean and rich conditions, influenced by injector spacing and momentum flux ratio. Combustion stabilization was consistently more effective under fuel-rich conditions. Increasing the momentum flux ratio intensified combustion instability regardless of the fuel condition. For fuel-lean conditions, a rapid transition in combustion stability was observed, with the specific transition point varying depending on the injector spacing. Considering the trade-off between instability and injector number density, a spacing of 30 mm between injectors is recommended. Additionally, for both single and two injectors with various spacings under both lean and rich conditions, combustion stability was generally better when the momentum flux ratio was less than 48.8. These findings provide valuable insights into the control and management of combustion instability, aiding in the design of rocket engine combustors.

喷射器间距和动量通量比对带有气体中心漩涡同轴喷射器的模型燃烧室燃烧不稳定性的影响
本研究通过实验和数值计算,研究了喷射器间距和动量通量比对单个和两个喷射器模型燃烧室燃烧不稳定性的影响。实验中,在实验室建造的模型室内安装了与实际火箭发动机类似的喷射器。使用 ANSYS Fluent 进行了数值模拟,采用了详细的燃烧模型来补充实验数据。根据燃料质量流量将流动条件分为燃料贫乏和燃料丰富两种。喷射器间距从 15 毫米到 45 毫米不等,通过调节燃料和氧化剂流量,动量通量比从 6.4 调整到 139.8。实验和数值结果一致显示,在喷油器间距和动量通量比的影响下,贫油和富油条件下的燃烧不稳定性趋势截然不同。在燃料丰富的条件下,燃烧稳定始终更为有效。无论燃料条件如何,提高动量通量比都会加剧燃烧不稳定性。在燃料贫乏的条件下,燃烧稳定性迅速发生转变,具体转变点因喷油器间距而异。考虑到不稳定性和喷油器数量密度之间的权衡,建议喷油器之间的间距为 30 毫米。此外,在贫油和富油条件下,对于不同间距的单喷油器和双喷油器,当动量通量比小于 48.8 时,燃烧稳定性通常更好。这些发现为控制和管理燃烧不稳定性提供了宝贵的见解,有助于火箭发动机燃烧器的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aerospace Science and Technology
Aerospace Science and Technology 工程技术-工程:宇航
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
28.60%
发文量
654
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Aerospace Science and Technology publishes articles of outstanding scientific quality. Each article is reviewed by two referees. The journal welcomes papers from a wide range of countries. This journal publishes original papers, review articles and short communications related to all fields of aerospace research, fundamental and applied, potential applications of which are clearly related to: • The design and the manufacture of aircraft, helicopters, missiles, launchers and satellites • The control of their environment • The study of various systems they are involved in, as supports or as targets. Authors are invited to submit papers on new advances in the following topics to aerospace applications: • Fluid dynamics • Energetics and propulsion • Materials and structures • Flight mechanics • Navigation, guidance and control • Acoustics • Optics • Electromagnetism and radar • Signal and image processing • Information processing • Data fusion • Decision aid • Human behaviour • Robotics and intelligent systems • Complex system engineering. Etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信