A Simulated Tracheostomy Tube Change Educational Intervention to Promote Competency Among Novice Healthcare Professionals: A Repeated Measures Study.

Tracheostomy (Warrenville, Ill.) Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-30
Jessica Peter, Chandler H Moser, Vidyadhari Karne, Stanola Stanley, Helen Wilson, Carol S Maragos, Jacqueline Stokes, Kathryn Mattare, Laurie Turner, Michael J Brenner, Vinciya Pandian
{"title":"A Simulated Tracheostomy Tube Change Educational Intervention to Promote Competency Among Novice Healthcare Professionals: A Repeated Measures Study.","authors":"Jessica Peter, Chandler H Moser, Vidyadhari Karne, Stanola Stanley, Helen Wilson, Carol S Maragos, Jacqueline Stokes, Kathryn Mattare, Laurie Turner, Michael J Brenner, Vinciya Pandian","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate an educational intervention to promote confidence, knowledge, and skills in tracheostomy tube change among nursing students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study, conducted at the at the Johns Hopkins Center for Immersive Learning and Digital Innovation, enrolled nursing students without prior experience in tracheostomy tube change. The intervention included a pre-recorded presentation, faculty demonstrations with a Tracheostomy Care Training Simulation Model, and participant practice demonstrating skills. Primary outcomes included confidence, knowledge, and competency with tracheostomy tube changes. Secondary outcomes included number of attempts required to achieve competency and time required per attempt. The study followed STROBE guidelines with repeated measure design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants in the study (n=50) had a mean age of 30 years, were predominantly female (83%) with a bachelor's degree (76%), most often in the third semester of nursing school (45%). Participants showed a mean improvement of 3.58 points out of five (SD: 0.56, P<0.001) across 11 pre- and post-test items. Every confidence assessment improved, with the largest increase in assessing tube placement. Knowledge assessments improved across all eight test items in the first test-retest interval, showing an improvement of 1.14 points out of five (SD: 0.89, P<0.001). Competency assessment improved in the first test-retest interval of 1.01 points out of five (SD: 0.65, P<0.001). On serial assessments, time to complete tracheostomy tube change decreased from 2.39 to 0.60 minutes. Faculty deemed 95% of participants competent after only one skill testing iteration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An educational intervention, combining digital presentations with interactive faculty-led simulations and practical skill assessments, successfully elevated nursing students' confidence, knowledge, and competency in tracheostomy tube changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":520079,"journal":{"name":"Tracheostomy (Warrenville, Ill.)","volume":"1 2","pages":"16-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11345849/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tracheostomy (Warrenville, Ill.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate an educational intervention to promote confidence, knowledge, and skills in tracheostomy tube change among nursing students.

Methods: The study, conducted at the at the Johns Hopkins Center for Immersive Learning and Digital Innovation, enrolled nursing students without prior experience in tracheostomy tube change. The intervention included a pre-recorded presentation, faculty demonstrations with a Tracheostomy Care Training Simulation Model, and participant practice demonstrating skills. Primary outcomes included confidence, knowledge, and competency with tracheostomy tube changes. Secondary outcomes included number of attempts required to achieve competency and time required per attempt. The study followed STROBE guidelines with repeated measure design.

Results: Participants in the study (n=50) had a mean age of 30 years, were predominantly female (83%) with a bachelor's degree (76%), most often in the third semester of nursing school (45%). Participants showed a mean improvement of 3.58 points out of five (SD: 0.56, P<0.001) across 11 pre- and post-test items. Every confidence assessment improved, with the largest increase in assessing tube placement. Knowledge assessments improved across all eight test items in the first test-retest interval, showing an improvement of 1.14 points out of five (SD: 0.89, P<0.001). Competency assessment improved in the first test-retest interval of 1.01 points out of five (SD: 0.65, P<0.001). On serial assessments, time to complete tracheostomy tube change decreased from 2.39 to 0.60 minutes. Faculty deemed 95% of participants competent after only one skill testing iteration.

Conclusion: An educational intervention, combining digital presentations with interactive faculty-led simulations and practical skill assessments, successfully elevated nursing students' confidence, knowledge, and competency in tracheostomy tube changes.

模拟气管造口术换管教育干预,提高新手医护人员的能力:重复测量研究
目的评估一项旨在提高护理专业学生更换气管造口管的信心、知识和技能的教育干预措施:这项研究在约翰-霍普金斯大学沉浸式学习和数字创新中心进行,招收了没有气管造口术换管经验的护理专业学生。干预措施包括预先录制的演示文稿、教师使用气管造口术护理培训模拟模型进行示范,以及参与者进行技能演示练习。主要结果包括更换气管造口管的信心、知识和能力。次要结果包括达到能力要求所需的尝试次数和每次尝试所需的时间。研究遵循 STROBE 指南,采用重复测量设计:研究参与者(n=50)的平均年龄为 30 岁,主要为女性(83%),拥有学士学位(76%),多数为护理学校第三学期的学生(45%)。参加者的平均成绩提高了 3.58 分(满分 5 分,标准差:0.56):将数字演示与教师指导的互动模拟和实际技能评估相结合的教育干预措施成功地提高了护理专业学生更换气管造口管的信心、知识和能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信