Expanded carrier screening for inherited genetic disease using exome and genome sequencing.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
N Belnap, K Ramsey, A Abraham, A Ryan, S Rangasamy, A Bonfitto, M Naymik, M Huentelman, S Strom, D Perry, A Subramaniam, W W Grody, S Szelinger, V Narayanan
{"title":"Expanded carrier screening for inherited genetic disease using exome and genome sequencing.","authors":"N Belnap, K Ramsey, A Abraham, A Ryan, S Rangasamy, A Bonfitto, M Naymik, M Huentelman, S Strom, D Perry, A Subramaniam, W W Grody, S Szelinger, V Narayanan","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.1964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The goal of this study was to assess the feasibility of using exome (ES) and genome sequencing (GS) in guiding preconception genetic screening (PCGS) for couples who are planning to conceive by creating a workflow for identifying risk alleles for autosomal recessive (AR) and X-linked (XL) disorders without the constraints of a predetermined, targeted gene panel. There were several limitations and challenges related to reporting and the technical aspects of ES and GS, which are listed in the discussion. We selected 150 couples from a cohort of families (trios) enrolled in a research protocol where the goal was to define the genetic etiology of disease in an affected child. Pre-existing, de-identified parental sequencing data were analyzed to define variants that would place the couple at risk of having a child affected by an AR or XL disorder. We identified 17 families who would be selected for counseling about risk alleles. We noted that only 3 of these at-risk couples would be identified if we limited ourselves to the current ACMG-recommended expanded carrier screening gene panel. ES and GS successfully identified couples who are at risk of having a child with a rare AR or XL disorder that would have been missed by the current recommended guidelines. Current limitations of this approach include ethical concerns, difficulties in reporting results including variant calling due to the rare nature of some of the variants, determining which disorders to report, as well as technical difficulties in detecting certain variants such as repeat expansions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1964","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The goal of this study was to assess the feasibility of using exome (ES) and genome sequencing (GS) in guiding preconception genetic screening (PCGS) for couples who are planning to conceive by creating a workflow for identifying risk alleles for autosomal recessive (AR) and X-linked (XL) disorders without the constraints of a predetermined, targeted gene panel. There were several limitations and challenges related to reporting and the technical aspects of ES and GS, which are listed in the discussion. We selected 150 couples from a cohort of families (trios) enrolled in a research protocol where the goal was to define the genetic etiology of disease in an affected child. Pre-existing, de-identified parental sequencing data were analyzed to define variants that would place the couple at risk of having a child affected by an AR or XL disorder. We identified 17 families who would be selected for counseling about risk alleles. We noted that only 3 of these at-risk couples would be identified if we limited ourselves to the current ACMG-recommended expanded carrier screening gene panel. ES and GS successfully identified couples who are at risk of having a child with a rare AR or XL disorder that would have been missed by the current recommended guidelines. Current limitations of this approach include ethical concerns, difficulties in reporting results including variant calling due to the rare nature of some of the variants, determining which disorders to report, as well as technical difficulties in detecting certain variants such as repeat expansions.

利用外显子组和基因组测序扩大遗传性基因疾病的携带者筛查。
本研究的目的是评估使用外显子组(ES)和基因组测序(GS)指导计划怀孕夫妇进行孕前基因筛查(PCGS)的可行性,方法是创建一个工作流程,在不受预先确定的目标基因面板限制的情况下,鉴定常染色体隐性(AR)和X连锁(XL)疾病的风险等位基因。在报告以及 ES 和 GS 的技术方面存在一些局限性和挑战,这些将在讨论中列出。我们从参与一项研究计划的家庭(三口之家)中挑选了 150 对夫妇,该计划的目标是确定患儿的遗传病因。我们对预先存在的、去标识的父母测序数据进行了分析,以确定哪些变异会使这对夫妇的孩子有患 AR 或 XL 疾病的风险。我们确定了 17 个将被选中进行风险等位基因咨询的家庭。我们注意到,如果仅限于目前 ACMG 推荐的扩大携带者筛查基因面板,那么这些高风险夫妇中只有 3 对能被识别出来。ES 和 GS 成功地发现了那些有可能生下患有罕见 AR 或 XL 疾病的孩子的夫妇,而如果按照目前推荐的指南,这些夫妇可能会被漏诊。目前这种方法的局限性包括:伦理问题、报告结果的困难(包括由于某些变异的罕见性而导致的变异调用)、确定报告哪些疾病以及检测某些变异(如重复扩展)的技术困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Journal of Genetic Counseling GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
26.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信