Reducing 30-day Acute Care Readmissions for Heart Failure Patients Through Implementation of a Discharge Bundle.

IF 0.8 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Professional Case Management Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-28 DOI:10.1097/NCM.0000000000000766
Jason Lindsey, Teresa Welch
{"title":"Reducing 30-day Acute Care Readmissions for Heart Failure Patients Through Implementation of a Discharge Bundle.","authors":"Jason Lindsey, Teresa Welch","doi":"10.1097/NCM.0000000000000766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Hospital readmissions have been a long-standing problem in the American health care system. Despite many efforts, programs, papers, and interventions identified and studied, 14% of all adult admissions result in a readmission. Readmissions are mostly considered preventable and are considered an indicator of care quality for a hospital. Due to unexpected readmissions, patients are at an increased risk for illness or injury, increased stress, financial strain, and diminished quality of life. Readmissions also negatively impact hospital systems related to decreased bed availability, stretched resources, and potential financial penalties and payment reductions. Patients with an admission related to heart failure are at an increased risk of readmission, with a national readmission rate of 23%.</p><p><strong>Primary practice setting: </strong>The quality improvement project was implemented on two telemetry units at an acute care hospital.</p><p><strong>Methodology and sample: </strong>A gap analysis identified procedural and organizational reasons for readmission in the heart failure population at an acute care hospital. Using evidence-based best practice guidelines established by the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and the Heart Failure Society of America, a four-pronged proactive discharge bundle was implemented using the plan-do-study-act framework for continuous improvement. All patients admitted to the telemetry units with a primary or secondary diagnosis of heart failure received the discharge planning bundle: (1) an early assessment by the case management department, (2) patient-centered specialty heart failure education, (3) predischarge medication delivery, and (4) predischarge physician follow-up appointment scheduling within 7 days of discharge. A total of 133 patients were evaluated for inclusion in the heart failure cohort. Of those, 52 patients received the evidence-based intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The evidence-based project was implemented over 7 weeks, September through October of 2023 on the medical telemetry units. Of the 52 patients receiving the evidence-based sample, two of the patients experienced a readmission due to heart failure (3.85%). Incidentally, it was found that patients without a readmission had an average of 2.3 completed interventions, while those with readmissions had an average of 1.5 interventions.</p><p><strong>Implications for case management practice: </strong>Case managers are an integral part of the care transition from the acute care setting back to the community. Often, it is the case manager leading this effort through various interventions. Findings from this quality improvement project suggest the use of the evidence-based, four-pronged approach to discharge planning for the heart failure patient population reduced the risk and rate of heart failure-related readmissions for the involved nursing units. These findings also surmise that there is a correlation between the number of interventions and the rate of readmission.</p>","PeriodicalId":45015,"journal":{"name":"Professional Case Management","volume":" ","pages":"81-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Professional Case Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCM.0000000000000766","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Hospital readmissions have been a long-standing problem in the American health care system. Despite many efforts, programs, papers, and interventions identified and studied, 14% of all adult admissions result in a readmission. Readmissions are mostly considered preventable and are considered an indicator of care quality for a hospital. Due to unexpected readmissions, patients are at an increased risk for illness or injury, increased stress, financial strain, and diminished quality of life. Readmissions also negatively impact hospital systems related to decreased bed availability, stretched resources, and potential financial penalties and payment reductions. Patients with an admission related to heart failure are at an increased risk of readmission, with a national readmission rate of 23%.

Primary practice setting: The quality improvement project was implemented on two telemetry units at an acute care hospital.

Methodology and sample: A gap analysis identified procedural and organizational reasons for readmission in the heart failure population at an acute care hospital. Using evidence-based best practice guidelines established by the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and the Heart Failure Society of America, a four-pronged proactive discharge bundle was implemented using the plan-do-study-act framework for continuous improvement. All patients admitted to the telemetry units with a primary or secondary diagnosis of heart failure received the discharge planning bundle: (1) an early assessment by the case management department, (2) patient-centered specialty heart failure education, (3) predischarge medication delivery, and (4) predischarge physician follow-up appointment scheduling within 7 days of discharge. A total of 133 patients were evaluated for inclusion in the heart failure cohort. Of those, 52 patients received the evidence-based intervention.

Results: The evidence-based project was implemented over 7 weeks, September through October of 2023 on the medical telemetry units. Of the 52 patients receiving the evidence-based sample, two of the patients experienced a readmission due to heart failure (3.85%). Incidentally, it was found that patients without a readmission had an average of 2.3 completed interventions, while those with readmissions had an average of 1.5 interventions.

Implications for case management practice: Case managers are an integral part of the care transition from the acute care setting back to the community. Often, it is the case manager leading this effort through various interventions. Findings from this quality improvement project suggest the use of the evidence-based, four-pronged approach to discharge planning for the heart failure patient population reduced the risk and rate of heart failure-related readmissions for the involved nursing units. These findings also surmise that there is a correlation between the number of interventions and the rate of readmission.

通过实施出院捆绑方案,减少心衰患者 30 天急诊再入院率。
目的:再入院一直是美国医疗系统的一个老大难问题。尽管做出了许多努力、制定了许多计划、发表了许多论文、确定并研究了许多干预措施,但仍有 14% 的成人入院患者再次入院。再入院大多被认为是可以预防的,也被认为是衡量医院医疗质量的一个指标。由于意外再入院,患者患病或受伤的风险增加,压力增大,经济紧张,生活质量下降。再入院也会对医院系统造成负面影响,包括床位减少、资源紧张以及潜在的经济处罚和付款减少。因心力衰竭入院的患者再入院的风险更高,全国再入院率为 23%:质量改进项目在一家急症医院的两个遥测病房实施:差距分析确定了一家急症医院心衰患者再入院的程序和组织原因。利用美国心脏协会、美国心脏病学会和美国心力衰竭协会制定的循证最佳实践指南,采用 "计划-实施-研究-行动 "的持续改进框架,实施了四管齐下的主动出院捆绑疗法。所有入住遥测病房并被诊断为一级或二级心力衰竭的患者都接受了出院计划捆绑:(1)由病例管理部门进行早期评估;(2)以患者为中心的心力衰竭专科教育;(3)出院前服药;(4)出院前医生在出院后 7 天内安排随访。经评估,共有 133 名患者被纳入心力衰竭队列。其中,52 名患者接受了循证干预:该循证项目于 2023 年 9 月至 10 月在医疗遥测病房实施,为期 7 周。在接受循证样本的 52 名患者中,有两名患者因心力衰竭再次入院(3.85%)。顺便提一下,研究发现,没有再次入院的患者平均完成了 2.3 次干预,而再次入院的患者平均完成了 1.5 次干预:病例管理人员是从急症护理环境返回社区的护理过渡过程中不可或缺的一部分。通常情况下,都是由病例管理人员通过各种干预措施来领导这项工作。该质量改进项目的研究结果表明,对心力衰竭患者群体采用循证、四管齐下的出院规划方法降低了相关护理单元与心力衰竭相关的再入院风险和比率。这些研究结果还推测,干预措施的数量与再入院率之间存在相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Professional Case Management
Professional Case Management HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
26.70%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Professional Case Management: The Leader in Evidence-Based Practice is a peer-reviewed, contemporary journal that crosses all case management settings. The Journal features best practices and industry benchmarks for the professional case manager and also features hands-on information for case managers new to the specialty. Articles focus on the coordination of services, management of payer issues, population- and disease-specific aspects of patient care, efficient use of resources, improving the quality of care/patient safety, data and outcomes analysis, and patient advocacy. The Journal provides practical, hands-on information for day-to-day activities, as well as cutting-edge research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信