Modeling multiple-criterion diagnoses by heterogeneous-instance logistic regression.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Statistics in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-30 Epub Date: 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1002/sim.10202
Chun-Hao Yang, Ming-Han Li, Shu-Fang Wen, Sheng-Mao Chang
{"title":"Modeling multiple-criterion diagnoses by heterogeneous-instance logistic regression.","authors":"Chun-Hao Yang, Ming-Han Li, Shu-Fang Wen, Sheng-Mao Chang","doi":"10.1002/sim.10202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a prodromal stage of Alzheimer's disease (AD) that causes a significant burden in caregiving and medical costs. Clinically, the diagnosis of MCI is determined by the impairment statuses of five cognitive domains. If one of these cognitive domains is impaired, the patient is diagnosed with MCI, and if two out of the five domains are impaired, the patient is diagnosed with AD. In medical records, most of the time, the diagnosis of MCI/AD is given, but not the statuses of the five domains. We may treat the domain statuses as missing variables. This diagnostic procedure relates MCI/AD status modeling to multiple-instance learning, where each domain resembles an instance. However, traditional multiple-instance learning assumes common predictors among instances, but in our case, each domain is associated with different predictors. In this article, we generalized the multiple-instance logistic regression to accommodate the heterogeneity in predictors among different instances. The proposed model is dubbed heterogeneous-instance logistic regression and is estimated via the expectation-maximization algorithm because of the presence of the missing variables. We also derived two variants of the proposed model for the MCI and AD diagnoses. The proposed model is validated in terms of its estimation accuracy, latent status prediction, and robustness via extensive simulation studies. Finally, we analyzed the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center-Uniform Data Set using the proposed model and demonstrated its potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":21879,"journal":{"name":"Statistics in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"4684-4701"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.10202","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a prodromal stage of Alzheimer's disease (AD) that causes a significant burden in caregiving and medical costs. Clinically, the diagnosis of MCI is determined by the impairment statuses of five cognitive domains. If one of these cognitive domains is impaired, the patient is diagnosed with MCI, and if two out of the five domains are impaired, the patient is diagnosed with AD. In medical records, most of the time, the diagnosis of MCI/AD is given, but not the statuses of the five domains. We may treat the domain statuses as missing variables. This diagnostic procedure relates MCI/AD status modeling to multiple-instance learning, where each domain resembles an instance. However, traditional multiple-instance learning assumes common predictors among instances, but in our case, each domain is associated with different predictors. In this article, we generalized the multiple-instance logistic regression to accommodate the heterogeneity in predictors among different instances. The proposed model is dubbed heterogeneous-instance logistic regression and is estimated via the expectation-maximization algorithm because of the presence of the missing variables. We also derived two variants of the proposed model for the MCI and AD diagnoses. The proposed model is validated in terms of its estimation accuracy, latent status prediction, and robustness via extensive simulation studies. Finally, we analyzed the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center-Uniform Data Set using the proposed model and demonstrated its potential.

通过异质事例逻辑回归对多重标准诊断建模。
轻度认知功能障碍(MCI)是阿尔茨海默病(AD)的前驱阶段,给护理工作和医疗费用带来沉重负担。临床上,MCI 的诊断是根据五个认知领域的损伤状况来确定的。如果其中一个认知领域受损,患者就会被诊断为 MCI;如果五个认知领域中有两个受损,患者就会被诊断为 AD。在医疗记录中,大多数情况下都会给出 MCI/AD 的诊断,但不会给出五个领域的状态。我们可以将领域状态视为缺失变量。这种诊断程序将 MCI/AD 状态建模与多实例学习联系起来,其中每个领域都类似于一个实例。不过,传统的多实例学习假设实例之间有共同的预测因子,但在我们的案例中,每个域都与不同的预测因子相关联。在本文中,我们对多实例逻辑回归进行了概括,以适应不同实例间预测因子的异质性。由于存在缺失变量,我们提出的模型被称为异质性实例逻辑回归,并通过期望最大化算法进行估计。我们还针对 MCI 和 AD 诊断推导出了所提模型的两个变体。通过大量的模拟研究,我们从估计准确性、潜伏状态预测和稳健性等方面对所提出的模型进行了验证。最后,我们利用所提出的模型对国家阿尔茨海默氏症协调中心统一数据集进行了分析,并证明了该模型的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Statistics in Medicine
Statistics in Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
334
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal aims to influence practice in medicine and its associated sciences through the publication of papers on statistical and other quantitative methods. Papers will explain new methods and demonstrate their application, preferably through a substantive, real, motivating example or a comprehensive evaluation based on an illustrative example. Alternatively, papers will report on case-studies where creative use or technical generalizations of established methodology is directed towards a substantive application. Reviews of, and tutorials on, general topics relevant to the application of statistics to medicine will also be published. The main criteria for publication are appropriateness of the statistical methods to a particular medical problem and clarity of exposition. Papers with primarily mathematical content will be excluded. The journal aims to enhance communication between statisticians, clinicians and medical researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信